Adherence to therapy, lifestyle modification and medical support of cardiovascular patients
https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2020-2665
Abstract
Aim. To study the quantitative parameters of adherence to lifestyle modification, medical support, and therapy in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD).
Material and methods. This cross-sectional study included 683 respondents: 168 patients with hypertension (HTN); 196 patients with stable angina; 141 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); 178 patients with heart failure (HF). We used N. A. Nikolaev questionnaire for adherence assessment. For all adherence parameters, the level ≤75% was regarded as insufficient. The study was carried out in accordance with Good Clinical Practice and Declaration ofHelsinki. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committees of all participating clinical centers. All patients signed written informed consent.
Results. Approximately 1/3 of respondents agreed to receive therapy. The adherence level was >75%. Patients with angina and AF were more likely to receive therapy. It turned out that that approximately 2/3 of patients were not ready for medical support. Patients with angina were less ready for medical support, while those with HTN and HF hadhigher values of adherence. Adherence to lifestyle modification was owest among analyzed parameters. Only 18,5% of hypertensive patients, 25,5% of patients with angina, 26,2% of AF patients and 23,1% of patients with HF were ready to change the lifestyle.
Conclusion. The study revealed a significant number (~2/3) of CVD patients with insufficient adherence, which specifies the need to assess the effectiveness of therapy and course of the disease in conditions of low adherence and to develop individualized therapeutic strategies.
Keywords
About the Authors
S. S. BunovaRussian Federation
Department of family medicine, Professor
Belgorod
N. I. Zhernakova
Russian Federation
Department of family medicine, head of the Department
Belgorod
Yu. P. Skirdenko
Russian Federation
Department of faculty therapy and gastroenterology, assistant
Omsk
N. A. Nikolaev
Russian Federation
Department of faculty therapy and gastroenterology, professor
Omsk
References
1. World Health Organization. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data, Geneva, WHO 2003. 211 р. Available at https://www.who.int/chp/knowledge/publications/adherence_report/en/.
2. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(38):2893-2962. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210.
3. Ponikowski P, Voors A, Anker S, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(27):2129-2200. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128.
4. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021-3104. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339.
5. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(3):407-477. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.
6. Nikolaev NA, Martynov AI, Drapkina OM, et al. The first Russian consensus on the quantitative assessment of the adherence to treatment. Therapy. 2018;5(23):11-32. (In Russ.) doi:10.18565/therapy.2018.5.11-32.
7. Lukina YuV, Kutishenko NP, Martsevich SYu, Drapkina OM. Questionnaires and scores for assessing medication adherence — advantages and disadvantages of the diagnostic method in research and actual clinical practice. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2020;19(3):2562. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2020-2562.
8. Morisky DE, Green LW, Levine DM. Concurrent and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of medication adherence. Med Care. 1986;24(1):67-74. doi:10.1097/00005650-198601000-00007.
9. Morisky DE, Ang A, Krousel-Wood M, Ward HJ. Predictive validity of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008;10(5):348-54. doi:10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.07572.x.
10. Moon SJ, Lee WY, Hwang JS. Accuracy of a screening tool for medication adherence: A systematic review and metaanalysis of the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0187139. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187139.
11. Nikolayev NA, Skirdenko YuP. Russian generic questionnaire for evaluation of compliance to drug therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;27(1):74-8. (In Russ.)
12. Drapkina OM, Livzan MA, Martynov AI, et al. The first Russian expert consensus on the quantitative evaluation of the treatment adherence: pivotal issues, algorithms and recommendations. Medical news of the North Caucasus. 2018;13(1-2):259-71. (In Russ.) doi:10.14300/mnnc.2018.13039.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Bunova S.S., Zhernakova N.I., Skirdenko Yu.P., Nikolaev N.A. Adherence to therapy, lifestyle modification and medical support of cardiovascular patients. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2020;19(6):2665. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2020-2665