The results of implementation of specialized stroke units and educational programs aimed at the secondary prevention of stroke in Tyumen district
https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2019-1-107-112
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the main results of work of specialized stroke units and departments and implementation of educational campaigns on secondary stroke prevention in Tyumen district in 2011-2017.
Material and methods. Work efficacy of specialized stroke units and departments in Tyumen district was evaluated according to standard measures (length of hospital stay, compliance with patient routing rules, timely diagnostic measures, frequency and efficacy of thrombolysis). The results of work of schools for stroke patients and their caregivers were evaluated using questionnaires distributed after the end of each educational program.
Results. We demonstrated an improvement of main efficacy measures of stroke units and departments, with most of them reaching target values for Russian Federation. There was a high attendance of educational programs on secondary stroke prevention (8254 persons during the study period). A total of 2200 distributed questionnaires demonstrated a high level of satisfaction with the results of educational programs and the quality of education organization.
Conclusion. Implementation of specialized stroke units in Tyumen district enabled an increase of the number of patients receiving systemic thrombolytic therapy, a decrease of mortality and an improvement of functional outcomes. Educational programs for stroke patients and their relatives increased the level of stroke awareness in the target population.
About the Authors
D. I. LebedevaRussian Federation
Tyumen
N. S. Brynza
Russian Federation
Tyumen
A. M. Nyamtsu
Russian Federation
Tyumen
Yu. S. Reshetnikova
Russian Federation
Tyumen
N. N. Kniazheva
Russian Federation
Tyumen
E. S. Akarachkova
Russian Federation
Moscow
A. S. Orlova
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Roth GA, Johnson C, Abajobir A, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases for 10 causes, 1990 to 2015. JACC. 2017;70(1):1-25. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.052.
2. Feigin VL, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, et al. GBD 2015 Neurological Disorders Collaborator Group. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders during 1990- 2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Neurol. 2015;16(11):877-97. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30299-5.
3. Stakhovskaia LV, Klochikhina OA, Bogatyreva MD, Kovalenko VV. Epidemiology of stroke in the Russian Federation: results of territory’s population registry (2009- 2010). Zhurnal nevrologii i psihiatrii im. C. C. Korsakova. 2013;113(5-1):4-10. (In Russ.)
4. Feigin VL, Krishnamurthi RV, Parmar P, et al; GBD 2013 Writing Group; GBD 2013 Stroke Panel Experts Group. Update on the global burden of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in 1990-2013: the GBD 2013 study. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45(3):161-76. doi:10.1159/000441085.
5. Suslina ZA, Varakin JuJa. Clinical guidance on early diagnostics, treatment and prevention of cerebrovascular diseases. M.: MEDpress-inform 2015; 438 p. (In Russ.)
6. Schwamm LH, Pancioli A, Acker JE 3rd, et al. American Stroke Association’s Task Force on the Development of Stroke Systems. Recommendations for the establishment of stroke systems of care: recommendations from the American Stroke Association’s Task Force on the Development of Stroke Systems. Stroke. 2005;36(3):690-703. doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000154252.62394.1e.
7. Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(9):Cd000197. doi:10.1002/14651858. CD000197.pub3.
8. Wardlaw JM, Murray V, Berge E, del Zoppo GJ. Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(7):Cd000213. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000213.pub3.
9. Badhiwala JH, Nassiri F, Alhazzani W, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2015;314(17):1832-43. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.13767.
10. Pollock A, Baer G, Campbell P, et al. Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(4):Cd001920. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001920.pub3.
11. Langhorne P, de Villiers L, Pandian JD. Applicability of stroke-unit care to low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(4):341-8. doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70024-8.
12. Zhai S, Gardiner F, Neeman T, et al. The cost-effectiveness of a stroke unit in providing enhanced patient outcomes in an Australian teaching hospital. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26(10):2362-8. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.05.025.
13. Baklushina EK, Bursikova DV, Nuzhenkova MV, et al. Health awareness of patients undergoing stroke and its condition and performance in the second phase rehabilitation. Kurortnaja medicina. 2016;2:98-101. (In Russ.)
14. Parfenov VA, Verbickaja SV. Secondary prevention of ischemic stroke: international recommendations and clinical practice. Nevrologicheskij zhurnal. 2014;2:4-10. (In Russ.) doi:10.18821/1560-9545-2014-19-2-4-10.
Review
For citations:
Lebedeva D.I., Brynza N.S., Nyamtsu A.M., Reshetnikova Yu.S., Kniazheva N.N., Akarachkova E.S., Orlova A.S. The results of implementation of specialized stroke units and educational programs aimed at the secondary prevention of stroke in Tyumen district. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2019;18(1):107-112. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2019-1-107-112