Stable angina pectoris: population trends, diagnostics, secondary prevention, and antianginal therapy
Abstract
Aim. To assess compliance with international clinical guidelines on coronary heart disease (CHD) secondary prevention, as well as on stable angina pectoris diagnostics and treatment, in Russian clinical practice settings. Material and methods . Among 5000 randomly selected out-patients visiting Moscow City Cardiology Dispanser (MCCD) in 2001, 1840 patients with stable angina diagnosis were identified. Out-patient medical documents were studied, and information on CHD risk factor (RF) registration, clinical diagnosis, clinical and laboratory tests, therapy (agents and their doses), associated diseases and their treatment, was analyzed. Results. Moscow doctors, in spite of existing international and national clinical guidelines, do not use objective diagnostic tests and rely on subjective complaints, while assessing disease severity and determining management tactics, in every second patient (49.2%). The doctors inadequately address RF in stable angina patients, fail to modify RF effectively, and do not attain RF target levels. The principal problems of pharmacotherapy are inadequately low use of statins in CHD secondary prevention (1.8% at out-patient clinics; 6.4% Ц at MCCD), as well as use of minimal effective doses for most antianginal agents. Coronarography, coronary angioplasty, and bypass surgery rates are substantially lower than those in Eastern European countries. Conclusion. The recommendations of national and international guidelines on CHD secondary prevention, stable angina diagnostics and treatment, are still fulfilled inadequately.
About the Authors
R. G. OganovRussian Federation
V. K. Lepakhin
Russian Federation
S. B. Fitilev
Russian Federation
A. M. Levin
Russian Federation
I. I. Shkrebneva
Russian Federation
Yu. Yu. Titarova
Russian Federation
M. K. Doronkina
Russian Federation
References
1. Лепахин В.К., Фитилев С.Б., Левин А.М. и др. Вторичная профилактика ИБС у пациентов перенесших инфаркт миокарда в Москве. Кардиоваск тер профил 2005; 4(3) ч I: .
2. Оганов Р.Г., Лепахин В.К., Фитилев С.Б. и др. Особенности диагностики и терапии стабильной стенокардии в Российской Федерации (международное исследование ATP – Angina Treatment Pattern). Кардиология 2003; 5: 9-15.
3. Eastaugh JL, Calvert MJ, Freemantle N., Highlighting the need for better patient care in stable angina: results of the international Angina Treatment Patterns (ATP) Survey in 7074 patients. Family Pract 2005; 22: 43-50.
4. Ruzillo W, Ponikowski P, Wilkins A. Clinical characteristics and methods of treatment of patients with stable coronary heart disease in the primary care settings -the results of the Polish, multicentre Angina Treatment Pattern (ATP) study. Int J Clin Pract 2004; 58(12): 1127-33.
5. Klein W. Treatment Patterns in Stable Angina: objectives and reality. Eur Heart J 2001; 3(Suppl O): O8-11.
6. Daly C, Clemens F. The clinical characteristics and investigations planned in patients with stable angina presenting to cardiologists in Europe from the Euro Heart Survey of Stable Angina. Eur Heart J 2005, publish-Ahead-of-Print published 2005, March 18.
7. Daly C, Clemens F. The initial management of stable angina in Europe, from the Euro Heart Survey. A description of pharmacological management and revascularization strategies initiated within the first month of presentation to a cardiologist in the Euro Heart Survey of Stable Angina. Eur Heart J 2005, publish-Ahead-of-Print published 2005, February 16.
8. EUROASPIRE II Study Group. Lifestyle and risk factor management and use of drug therapies in coronary patients from 15 countries. Principal results from EUROASPIRE II Euro Heart Survey Programme. Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 554-72.
9. EUROASPIRE I and II Study Group. Critical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I and II in nine countries. Lancet 2001; 357: 995-1001.
10. Pepine C, Abrams J, Marks R, et al. Characteristics of a Contemporary Population with Angina Pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1994; 74: 226-31.
11. Wood D, De Backer G, Faergeman O, et al. Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice: recommendations of the Second Task Force of the European and other Societies on coronary prevention. Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 1434-503.
12. Py r l K, De Backer G, Graham I, et al. Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice: recommendations of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology, European Atherosclerosis Society and European Society of Hypertension. Eur Heart J 1994; 15: 1300-31.
13. AHA Medical/Scientific Statement. Consensus Panel statement. Preventing Heart Attack and Death in Patients With Coronary Disease. Circulation 1995; 92: 2-4.
14. De Backer G, Ambrosioni E, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular prevention in clinical practice: recommendations of the Third Joint Task Force of the European and other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 1601-10.
15. Committee on Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management jf patients with cronic stable angina – summary article^ a report of the American College Of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. JACC 2003; 41: 159-68.
16. Management of stable angina pectoris. Recommendations of the Task Force of the European Society of Caddiology. Eur Heart J 1997; 18: 394-413.
Review
For citations:
Oganov R.G., Lepakhin V.K., Fitilev S.B., Levin A.M., Shkrebneva I.I., Titarova Yu.Yu., Doronkina M.K. Stable angina pectoris: population trends, diagnostics, secondary prevention, and antianginal therapy. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2006;5(1):49-54. (In Russ.)