Preview

Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention

Advanced search

Fixed trandolapril and verapamil SR combination effectiveness in arterial hypertension patients

Abstract

Aim. To study the effectiveness, rates of target blood pressure (BP) level achievement, and safety of a fixed-dose trandolapril and verapamil SR combination (Tarka) in patients with Stage I-II arterial hypertension (AH).

Material and methods. The study initially included 100 AH patients; 7 dropped out, and 4 were excluded due to inclu- sion criteria violation. The study protocol was completed  by 89 participants (36% men, 64% women), aged 27-74 years (mean age 56,6±10,8 years), with mean AH duration of 9,1±8 years. After 3-14-day wash-out period, clinical mean systolic BP (SBP clin.) level was 158,1±9,3/95,1±8,0 mm Hg, and heart rate (HR) level – 75,2±7,4 bpm. BP level corresponded to Stage I AH in 40,5% of the patients, and to Stage II AH – in 59,5%. Eighty five per cent of the participants received antihypertensive medications, 17% had Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-2), 20% were smokers.

Results. In all patients, Tarka therapy (2/180 mg/d) was associated with adequate BP reduction. Antihypertensive effect reached its maximum at Week 4 of the treatment. Twelve-week therapy resulted in significant decrease in BP clin., (∆=-28,9±11,0/-18,4±8,1;  p<0,001) and HR (∆=-6,0±6,6;  p<0,0001). Target SBP, DBP or SBP+DBP levels were achieved in 82%, 96%, and 80%, respectively. In DM-2 patients, target BP level was achieved in 71%. According to 24-hour BP monitoring data, after 12 weeks of treatment, BP was normalized in 68 participants: in 88% – for SBP, in 99% – for DBP, and in 88% – for both SBP and DBP. In all patients, the treatment was well tolerated;  adverse effects (AE) were registered in 9 individuals only.

Conclusion. Good antihypertensive  effectiveness of fixed trandolapril and verapamil combination facilitated target BP level achievement in 80% of the patients, with low AE rates. Therefore, the medication could be recommended at initial treatment stage.

About the Authors

L. G. Ratova
Russian Cardiology Scientific and Clinical Complex, Federal Agency on High Medical Technologies
Russian Federation


I. E. Chazova
Russian Cardiology Scientific and Clinical Complex, Federal Agency on High Medical Technologies
Russian Federation


M. B. Antsiferov
Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation


Yu. B. Belousov
Russian State Medical University
Russian Federation


V. S. Moiseev
People’s Friendship University
Russian Federation


M. V. Shestakova
Endocrinology Research Center. Moscow
Russian Federation


References

1. Kannel WB, Schwartz MJ, McNamara PM. Blood pressure and risk of coronary heart disease: the Framingham study. Dis Chest 1969; 56(1): 43-52.

2. Stamler J, Neaton JD, Wentworth DN. Blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) and risk of fatal coronary heart disease. Hypertension 1989; 13(5 Suppl.): I2.

3. Miura K, Daviglus ML, Dyer AR, et al. Relationship of blood pressure to 25-year mortality due to coronary heart disease, car- diovascular diseases, and all causes in young adult men: the Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161(12): 1501-8.

4. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, et al. Prospective studies collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one mil- lion adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360(9349): 1903-13.

5. Coldberg AI, Dunlay MC, Sweet CS. Safety and tolerability of losartan potassium, an angiotensin II receptor antagonists, com- pared with hydrochlorthiazide, atenolol, felodipine ER, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibirors for the treatment of systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75: 793-5.

6. Tatti P, Pahor M, Buington R, et al. Outcome results of the Fosinipril versus Amlodipine Cardiovascular events randomized trial (FACET) in patients with hypertension and NDDM. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 579-603.

7. Elliott HL, Meredith PA. Clinical implications of the trough-peak ratio. Blood press Monit 1996; 6(Suppl. 1): 47-51.

8. Holzgreve H. Safety profile of the combination of verapamil and trandolapril. J Hypertens 1997; 15(Suppl 2): 51-3.

9. Staessen JA, Bieniaszewski L, O’Brien ET, et al. An epidemio- logical approach to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: the Belgian population study. Blood Press Monit 1996; 1: 13-26.

10. Johnston D, Lesoway R, Humen D, Kostuk W. Clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of propranolol in combination with verapamil, nifedipine and diltiazem in exertional angina pectoris: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, cross-over study. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55: 680-7.

11. Stamler J, Stamler R, Neaton JD. Blood pressure, systolic and diastolic, and cardiovascular risks. US population data. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153(5): 598-615.

12. Ратова Л.Г., Дмитриев В.В., Толпыгина С.Н., Чазова И.Е.Суточное мониторирование артериального давления в клинической практике. Конс 2001; Приложение Артер гиперт: 3-14.

13. Fernandez R, Puig JG, Rodriguez-Perez JC, et al. Effect of two antihypertensive combinations on metabolic control in type-2 diabetic hypertensive patients with albuminuria: a randomised, double-blind study. J Hum Hypertens 2001; 15: 849-56.

14. Bakris G, Molitch M, Hewkin A, et al. Differences in Glucose Tolerance Between Fixed-Dose Antihypertensive Drug Combinations in People With Metabolic Syndrome. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 2592-7.


Review

For citations:


Ratova L.G., Chazova I.E., Antsiferov M.B., Belousov Yu.B., Moiseev V.S., Shestakova M.V. Fixed trandolapril and verapamil SR combination effectiveness in arterial hypertension patients. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2008;7(2):11-15. (In Russ.)

Views: 5253


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1728-8800 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0125 (Online)