Atorvastatin: evidence base 15 years later
https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2011-3-103-112
Abstract
HMG-CoA inhibitors have been widely used in primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerosis for more than 30 years. The evidence base for statins includes dozens of randomized clinical trials (RCT), involving hundreds of thousands patients. According to the results of the latest meta-analyses, reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-CH) level by 1 mmol/l in statin-treated patients could decrease cardiovascular risk by 0,8 %. Atorvastatin (Liprimar®) is a modern synthetic statin, which has been thoroughly studied in several RCTs over the last 15 years. These trials demonstrated its effectiveness and tolerability in patients with chronic coronary heart disease, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and arterial hypertension. In the studies comparing atorvastatin (10-80 mg/d) to other statins, baseline LDL-CH levels were reduced by 53 % in atorvastatintreated patients. Atorvastatin therapy was also well tolerated. Compared to placebo, atorvastatin therapy in the dose of 10 and 80 mg/d was associated with the incidence of hepatic transaminase elevation of 0,1 % and 0,6 %, respectively. This evidence base (in particular, the results of the trials on 80 mg/d atorvastatin therapy in ACS patients) has been a cornerstone of modern clinical guidelines, recommending target LDL-CH levels of 2 mmol/l. Currently, atorvastatin is the most widely prescribed statin in the majority of both developed and developing countries. Increasing initial dose and prescribing high-dose atorvastatin therapy (40-80 mg/d) could facilitate an improvement in treatment quality and a reduction in high levels of cardiovascular mortality inRussia.
About the Authors
A. V. Susekov
A.L. Myasnikov Research Institute of Clinical Cardiology, Russian Cardiology Scientific and Research Complex
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
N. V. Khokhlova
A.L. Myasnikov Research Institute of Clinical Cardiology, Russian Cardiology Scientific and Research Complex
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001; 285(19): 2486-97.
2. Комитет экспертов Всероссийского научного общества кардиологов (ВНОК), Российские рекомендации по диагностике и коррекции нарушений липидного обмена с целью профилактики и лечения атеросклероза (IV пересмотр), 2009/
3. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN, et al. Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Circulation 2004; 110: 227-39.
4. Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of cardiology and Other Societies on cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (Constituted by reprtesentatives of nine societies and by invited experts). European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2007; 14 Suppl 2: S1-113.
5. Genest J, McPherson R, Frohlich J, et al. CCS 2009 Canadian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult. Can J Cardiol 2009; 25(10): 567-79.
6. Jones P, Kafonek S, Laurora I, Hunninghake D, for the CURVES Investigators. Comparative dose efficacy study of atorvastatin versus simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin and fluvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia (the CURVES Study). Am J Cardiology 1998; 81(5): 582-7.
7. Pedro-Botet J, Schaefer EJ, Bakker-Arkema RG, et al. Apolipoprotein E genotype affects plasma lipid response to atorvastatin in a gender specific manner. Atherosclerosis 2001; 158: 183-93.
8. Nicholls SJ, Tuzcu M, Sipahi I, et al Statins. High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, and Regression of Coronary Atherosclerosis. JAMA; 2007: 297(5).
9. Barter PJ, Nicholls S, Rye K, et al. Antiinflammatory Properties of HDL. Circulation Res 2004; 95: 764.
10. Pitt B, Waters D, Brown WV, et al. Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy compared with angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease. Atorvastatin versus Revascularization Treatment Investigators. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 70-6.
11. Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Effects of atorvastatin on early recurrent ischemic events in acute coronary syndromes: the MIRACL study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001; 285: 1711-8.
12. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomized trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet 1994; 344: 1383-9.
13. McCormick LS, Black DM, Waters D, et al. Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of a trial comparing aggressive lipid lowering with Atorvastatin Versus Revascularization Treatments (AVERT). Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 1130-3.
14. Smilde TJ, Wissen S, Wollershei H, et al. Effect of aggressive versus conventional lipid lowering on atherosclerosis progression in familial hypercholesterolaemia (ASAP): a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet 2001; 357: 577-81.
15. Sever PS. Different Time Course for Prevention of Coronary and Stroke Events by Atorvastatin in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA) Am J Cardiol 2005; 96: 39F-44.
16. Colhoun HM, Betteridge DJ, Durrington PN, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364: 685-96.
17. The diabetes atorvastatin lipid intervention (dali) study group, the effect of aggressive versus standard lipid lowering by atorvastatin on diabetic dyslipidemia the dali study: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic dyslipidemia. Diabetes care 2001; 24: 1335-41.
18. Okazaki S, Yokoyama T, Miyauchi K, et al. Early Statin Treatment in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Demonstration of the Beneficial Effect on Atherosclerotic Lesions by Serial Volumetric Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis During Half a Year After Coronary Event: The ESTABLISH Study. Circulation 2004; 110: 1061-8.
19. Athyros VG, Mikhailidis DP, Papageorgiou AA, et al. Effect of atorvastatin on high density lipoprotein cholesterol and its relationship with coronary events: a subgroup analysis of the GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary heart- disease Evaluation (GREACE) Study Curr Med Res Opin 2004; 20(5): 627-37.
20. Pedersen TR. High-Dose Atorvastatin vs Usual-Dose Simvastatin for Secondary Prevention after Myocardial Infarction. The IDEAL Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA 2005; 294: 2437-45.
21. Amarenco P, Bogousslavsky J, Callahan A, et al. High-Dose Atorvastatin after Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack. The Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL). N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 549-59.
22. Cannon CP, Braunwald E, Carolyn H, et al. Intensive versus Moderate Lipid Lowering with Statins after Acute Coronary Syndromes. Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 22. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1495-504.
23. Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, et al. REVERSAL Investigators. Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipidlowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 3; 291(9): 1071-80.
24. LaRosa JC, Grundy SM, Waters DD, et al; Treating to New Targets (TNT) Investigators. Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2005; 352(14): 1425-35.
25. Nawrocki JW, Weiss SR, Davidson MH, et al. Reduction of LDL cholesterol by 25 % to 60 % in patients with primary hypercholesteroleamia by atorvastatin, a new HMG-Ko-A reductase inhibitor. Arteriosclerosis Thromb Vascular Biology 1995; 15: 678-82.
26. Pedersen TR, Faergeman O, Kastelein JJP, et al. High dose atorvastatin vs usual dose simvastatin for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction. JAMA 2005; 294(19): 2437-45.
27. Jones PH, Davidson MH, Stein EA, et al; STELLAR Study Group. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR* Trial). Am J Cardiol 2003; 92(2): 152-60.
28. Insull W, Kafonek S, Goldner D. Comparison of efficacy and safety of atorvastatin (10mg) with simvastatin (10mg) at six weeks. ASSET Investigators. Am J Card 2001; 87(5): 554-9.
29. Nawrocki JW, Weiss SR, Davidson MH, et al. Reduction of LDL cholesterol by 25 % to 60 % in patients with primary hypercholesteroleamia by atorvastatin, a new HMG-Ko-A reductase inhibitor. Arteriosclerosis Thromb Vascular Biology 1995; 15: 678-82.
30. Andrews TC, Ballantyne CV, Hsia JA, et al. Achieving and maintaining National Cholesterol Education Program lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol goals with five statins. Am J Med; 111(3); 185-91.
31. Karalis DG, Ross AM, Vacari RM. Comparison of efficacy and safety of atorvastatin and simvastatin in patients with dyslipidemia with and without coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89(6): 667-71.
32. Jones PH, McKenney JM, Karalis DG. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin initiated at different starting doses in patients with dyslipidemia. Evide Based Cardiovasc Med 2005; 9(2): 98-101.
33. Schrott H, Fereshetian AG, Knopp RH, et al. A Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled, Dose- Ranging Study of Atorvastatin. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 1998; 3(2): 119-24.
34. Haller MJ, Stein JM, Shuster JJ, et al. Pediatric Atorvastatin in Diabetes Trial (PADIT): A Pilot Study to Determine the Effect of Atorvastatin on Arterial Stiffness and Endothelial Function in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. J Pediatric Endocrinol Metabol 2009; 22: 65-8.
35. Law MR, Wald NJ, Thompson SG. By how much and how quickly does reduction in serum cholesterol concentration lower risk of ischaemic heart disease? BMJ 1994; 308: 367-72.
36. McTaggart F, Bucket L, Davidson R, et al. Preclinical and clinical pharmacology of rosuvastatin, a new 3-hydroxy-3-methyIglutaryl co-A reductase inhibitor Am J Cardiology 2001; 87 (Suppl): 28B-32.
37. Ward WH, Holdgate GA, Rowsell S, et al. Molecular mechanism for inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA (HMGCoA) reductase by rosuvastatin. Biochem Soc Trans 2003; 31: 528-31.
38. Briel M, Ferreira-Gonzalez I, You JJ, et al. Association between change in high density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. BMJ 2009; 338: b92. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b92.
39. Insull W, Kafonek S, Goldner D, et al. Use of A Treatment Algorithm to Achieve NCEP ATP III Goals With Atorvastatin, Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 554-9.
40. Forrest MJ, Bloomfield D, Briscoe RJ. Torcetrapib-induced blood pressure elevation is independent of CETP inhibition and is accompanied by increased circulating levels of aldosterone. Br J Pharmacol 2008; 154: 1465-73.
41. Newman C, Tsai J, Szarek M, et al. Comparative Safety of Atorvasatin 80 mg versus 10 mg derived from analysis of 49 completed trials in 14236 patients. Am J Cardiology 2006; 97: 61-7.
42. Silva M, Matthews ML, Jarvis C, et al. Meta-Analysis of DrugInduced Adverse Events Associated with Intensive-Dose Statin Therapy. Clin Ther 2007; 29: 253-60.
43. Newman CB, Palmer G, Silbershatz H, et al. Safety of atorvastatin derived from analysis of 44 completed trials in 9,416 patients. Am J Card 2003; 92: 670-6.
44. Сусеков А.В., Кухарчук В.В. Безопасность и переносимость монотерапии статинами и их комбинированной терапии с эзетролом: фокус на миопатии.
45. Kanamitsu M, Ebisuzaki W, Woollen J, et al. NCEP-DEO AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2). Bul Atmos Met Soc 2002; 1631-43.
46. Wood D, De Backer G, Faergeman O, et al. EAS/EAC/ESH Task Force I-IV. Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 1434-503.
47. Waters D. Safety of high-dose atorvasatin therapy. Am J Cardiol 2005; 96: 69F-75.
48. Hunninghake D. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Managed Care Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Treated in Aggressive Lipid Lowering Programs Using Atorvastatin Versus Usual Care: The Aggressive Lipid-Lowering Initiation Abates New Cardiac Events (ALLIANCE) Study. www.acc04online.org.
Review
For citations:
Susekov A.V., Khokhlova N.V. Atorvastatin: evidence base 15 years later. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2011;10(3):103-112. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2011-3-103-112
Views:
1721
Email this article 
