Preview

Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention

Advanced search

Clinical effectiveness of bilateral recanalization of chronic coronary artery occlusion

https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2012-6-33-37

Abstract

Aim. To assess the short- and long-term angiographic and clinical effectiveness of endovascular bilateral recanalization of chronic coronary artery occlusion (CCAO), compared to conservative therapeutic strategy.
Material and methods. The study included 56 patients with coronary heart disease and CCAO. Angina Functional Class (FC) was assessed clinically and in electrocardiography tests. Local and global myocardial contractility was assessed using echocardiography. Group I (n=36) included CCAO patients who underwent an attempt of bilateral percutaneous coronary angioplasty; Group II (n=20) included CCAO patients who were treated conservatively. Clinical effectiveness of the treatment was assessed at 12 months.
Results. At baseline, 16 and 20 Group I patients had FC III and II, respectively. Out of 36 attempts of bilateral recanalization, 27 were successful, based on the angiography results. All these 27 cases were also clinically successful in the short term, and 20 in the long term. Global myocardial contractility increased from 54±3% to 56,9±4% (p=0,03). In Group II, 10 and 10 patients had baseline FC III and II, respectively. The long-term stabilisation of clinical status was observed in 15 patients, with the mean levels of left ventricular ejection fraction of 53,9±2,4% (p=0,9). Observed complications of coronary angioplasty did not result in clinically significant ischemic and haemorrhagic events, while the clinical improvement was substantially more pronounced, compared to Group II.
Conclusion. Bilateral CCAO recanalization is a technically demanding procedure, requiring an extensive surgical expertise and experience, and linked to a higher risk of complications. However, it could be used when the antegrade access is impossible; the anaesthesiological risk of coronary artery bypass graft surgery is high; and the patient refuses the cardiac surgery intervention.

About the Authors

I. S. Ruzanov
Saratov Research Institute of Cardiology, Saratov
Russian Federation


I. V. Shitikov
Saratov Research Institute of Cardiology, Saratov
Russian Federation


I. V. Titkov
Saratov Research Institute of Cardiology, Saratov
Russian Federation


E. A. Glukhov
Saratov Research Institute of Cardiology, Saratov
Russian Federation


A. K. Sanbaev
Saratov Research Institute of Cardiology, Saratov
Russian Federation


M. S. Zhuravel
Saratov Research Institute of Cardiology, Saratov
Russian Federation


A. O. Oleynik
Saratov Research Institute of Cardiology, Saratov
Russian Federation


References

1. Saito S. Progress in Angioplasty for Chronic Total Occlusions. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions. 2010; 76: 541-2.

2. Weisz G, Moses JW. Contemporary Principles of Coronary chronic Total Occlusion Recanalization. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2010; 75: S21-7.

3. Saito S. Different Strategies of Retrograde Approach in Coronary Angioplasty for Chronic Total Occlusion. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 2008; 71: 8-19.

4. Favero L, Penzo C, Nikas D, et al. Cardiac and Extracardiac Complications During CTO Interventions: When to Stop a CTO Procedure. Interventional Cardiology 2010; 2(3): 355-67.

5. Bell MR, Berger PB, Menke KK, Holmes DR Jr. Balloon angioplasty of chronic total coronary artery occlusions: what does it cost in radiation exposure, time, and materials? Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992; 25: 10-5.

6. Saito S, Tanaka S, Hiroe Y, et al. Angioplasty for Chronic Total Occlusion by Using Tapered-Tip Guidewires. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 2003; 59: 305-11.

7. Joyal D, Afilalo J, Rinfret S. Effectiveness of Recanalization of Chronic Total Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am Heart J 2010; 160(1): 179-87.

8. Suero JA, Marso SP, Jones PG, et al.: Procedural outcomes and longterm survival among patiens undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of a chronic total occlusion in native coronary arteries: a 20-year experience. JACC 2001; 38: 409-14.

9. Current best practice in interventional cardiology/ edited by B. Meier 2010. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. P 231.

10. Schofer J, Rau T, Schluter M, Mathey DG. Restenosis after stenting of matched occluded and on-occluded coronary arteries Should there be a difference? Eur Heart J 1999; 20: 1175-81.

11. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Severe Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 961-72.

12. Cheitlin MD, Alpert JS, Armstrong WF, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the clinical application of echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Clinical Application of Echocardiography). Developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography. Circulation 1997; 95: 1686-744.

13. Elezi S, Schuhlen H, Kastrati A, et al. Six months angiographic followup after stenting of chronic total coronary occlusions. JACC 1997; 29 (Suppl.A): 16A.


Review

For citations:


Ruzanov I.S., Shitikov I.V., Titkov I.V., Glukhov E.A., Sanbaev A.K., Zhuravel M.S., Oleynik A.O. Clinical effectiveness of bilateral recanalization of chronic coronary artery occlusion. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2012;11(6):33-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2012-6-33-37

Views: 1287


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1728-8800 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0125 (Online)