Reversal of vascular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients through blockade of angiotensin II receptors

Aim. May blockade of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1) with an angiotensin receptor blocker reverse vascular pathology independent of blood pressure (BP) lowering. Material and methods. Stage I hypertensive, nondiabetic patients (61% male; age 38 to 67 years) were randomized after a 4-week washout period to olmesartan medoxomil 20 to 40 mg or atenolol 50 to 100 mg plus additional agents (hydrochlorothiazide, amlodipine, or hydralazine) as needed for a goal BP <140/90 mm Hg. At baseline and after 1 year of treatment, subcutaneous gluteal resistance arteries were examined on a pressurized myograph to evaluate remodeling. Biopsies were available from 22 atenolol recipients, 27 olmesartan medoxomil recipients, and 11 normal volunteer controls. Results. BP was reduced to a comparable degree by olmesartan medoxomil (from 149±11/92±8 mm Hg to 120±9/77±6 mm Hg; p<0,05 [mean ± standard deviation]) and atenolol (from 147±10/90±6 mm Hg to 125±12/78±7 mm Hg; p<0,05 [mean ± standard deviation]) from baseline for each arm (p=0,08 for the 40-week treatment mean between arms). After one year’s treatment, the wall-to-lumen ratio in arteries from patients treated with olmesartan medoxomil was significantly reduced (from 14,9% to 11,1%; p<0,01), whereas no significant change was observed in arteries from atenolol-treated patients (from 16,0% to 15,5%; p=NS); the wall- to-lumen ratio in controls was 11,0%. Conclusion. Blockade of AT1 receptors showed a superior corrective effect on the altered structure of resistance arteries in essential hypertension that was independent of the magnitude of BP reduction, and resulted in values similar to those in normotensive controls.

1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 Report. JAMA 2003; 289: 2560-72.

2. Folkow B. Physiological aspects of primary hypertension. Physiol Rev 1982; 62: 347-504.

3. Heagerty AM, Aalkjaer C, Bund SJ, et al. Small artery structure in hypertension. Dual processes of remodeling and growth. Hypertension 1993; 21: 391-7.

4. Intengan HD, Thibault G, Li JS, Schiffrin EL. Resistance artery mechanics, structure, and extracellular components in spontaneously hypertensive rats: effects of angiotensin receptor antagonism and converting enzyme inhibition. Circulation 1999; 100: 2267-75.

5. Lewis EJ. The role of angiotensin II receptor blockers in preventing the progression of renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Am J Hypertens 2002; 15: 123S-8.

6. Schiffrin EL, Park JB, Intengan HD, Touyz RM. Correction of arterial structure and endothelial dysfunction in human essential hypertension by the angiotensin receptor antagonist losartan. Circulation 2000; 101: 1653-9.

7. Schiffrin EL. Vascular and cardiac benefits of angiotensin receptor blockers. Am J Med 2002; 113: 409-18.

8. Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, et al. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 861-9.

9. Dahlof B, Pennert K, Hansson L. Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients. A metaanalysis of 109 treatment studies. Am J Hypertens 1992; 5: 95-110.

10. Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension Study (LIFE): a randomized trial against atenolol. Lancet 2002; 359: 995-1003.

11. Mulvany MJ. Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on vascular remodeling of resistance vessels in hypertensive patients. Metabolism 1998;47(12 Suppl 1): S20-3.

12. Rizzoni D, Porteri E, Piccoli A, et al. Effects of losartan and enalapril on small artery structure in hypertensive rats. Hypertension 1998; 32: 305-10.

13. Schiffrin EL, Park JB, Pu Q. Effect of crossing over hypertensive patients from a beta-blocker to an angiotensin receptor antagonist on resistance artery structure and on endothelial function. J Hypertens 2002; 20: 71-8.

14. Skov K, Eiskjaer H, Hansen HE, et al. Treatment of young subjects at high familial risk of future hypertension with an angiotensinreceptor blocker. Hypertension 2007; 50: 89-95.

15. Thybo NK, Stephens N, Cooper A, et al. Effect of antihypertensive treatment on small arteries of patients with previously untreated essential hypertension. Hypertension 1995; 25: 474- 81.

16. Schiffrin EL, Deng LY, Larochelle P. Effects of a beta-blocker or a converting enzyme inhibitor on resistance arteries in essential hypertension. Hypertension 1994; 23:83-91.

17. Savoia C, Touyz RM, Endemann DH, et al. Angiotensin receptor blocker added to previous antihypertensive agents on arteries of diabetic hypertensive patients. Hypertension 2006; 48: 271-7.

18. Schiffrin EL, Deng LY. Structure and function of resistance arteries of hypertensive patients treated with a beta-blocker or a calcium channel antagonist. J Hypertens 1996; 14: 1247-55.

19. Schiffrin EL, Hayoz D. How to assess vascular remodeling in small and medium-sized muscular arteries in humans. J Hypertens 1997; 15: 571- 84.

20. Schiffrin EL. Remodeling of resistance arteries in essential hypertension and effects of antihypertensive treatment. Am J Hypertens 2004; 17: 1192-200.

21. Melenovsky V, Borlaug BA, Fetics B, et al. Estimation of central pressure augmentation using automated radial artery tonometry. J Hypertens 2007; 25: 1403-9.

22. O’Rourke MF, Adji A. An updated clinical primer on large artery mechanics: implications of pulse waveform analysis and arterial tonometry. Curr Opin Cardiol 2005; 20: 275- 81.

23. Smith RD, Yokoyama H, Averill DB, et al. The protective effects of angiotensin II blockade with olmesartan medoxomil on resistance vessel remodeling (the VIOS Study): rationale and baseline characteristics. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2006; 6: 335-42.

24. Giles TD. Blood pressure goals for hypertension guidelines: what is wrong with ”optimal”? J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2006; 8: 835-9.

25. Julius S, Nesbitt SD, Egan BM, et al. Feasibility of treating prehypertension with an angiotensin-receptor blocker. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1685-97.

26. Mancia G, Grassi G. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure control in antihypertensive drug trials. J Hypertens 2002; 20: 1461-4.

27. Mathiassen ON, Buus NH, Larsen ML, et al. Small artery structure adapts to vasodilatation rather than to blood pressure during antihypertensive treatment. J Hypertens 2007; 25: 1027-34.

28. Heagerty AM. Predicting hypertension complications from small artery structure. J Hypertens 2007; 25: 939-40.

29. Schiffrin EL, Pu Q, Park JB. Effect of amlodipine compared to atenolol on small arteries of previously untreated essential hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens 2002; 15: 105-10.

30. Thybo NK, Korsgaard N, Eriksen S, et al. Dose-dependent effects of perindopril on blood pressure and small-artery structure. Hypertension 1994; 23: 659-66.

31. Izzard AS, Rizzoni D, Gabiti-Rosei E, Heagerty AM. Small artery structure and hypertension: adaptive changes and target organ damage. J Hypertens 2005; 23: 247-50.

32. Mathiassen ON, Buus NH, Sihm I, et al. Small artery structure is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events in essential hypertension. J Hypertens 2007; 25: 1021-6.

33. Rizzoni D, Porteri E, Boari GE, et al. Prognostic significance of small-artery structure in hypertension. Circulation 2003; 108: 2230-5.

34. Yokoyama H, Averill DB, Brosnihan KB, et al Role of blood pressure reduction in prevention of cardiac and vascular hypertrophy. Am J Hypertens 2005; 18: 922-9.

35. Rizzoni D, Porteri E, De Ciuceis C, et al. Effect of treatment with candesartan or enalapril on subcutaneous small artery structure in hypertensive patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Hypertension 2005; 45: 659-65.

36. Sihm I, Schroeder AP, Aalkjaer C, et al. Effect of antihypertensive treatment on cardiac and subcutaneous artery structure: a comparison between calcium channel blocker and thiazidebased regimens. Am J Hypertens 1998; 11: 263-71.

37. Rizzoni D, Palombo C, Porteri E, et al. Relationships between coronary flow vasodilator capacity and small artery remodeling in hypertensive patients. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 625-31.

38. De Ciuceis C, Porteri E, Rizzoni D, et al. Structural alterations of subcutaneous small-resistance arteries may predict major cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2007; 20: 846-52.

39. Turnbull F, Neal B, Pfeffer M, et al. Blood pressuredependent and independent effects of agents that inhibit the renin-angiotensin system. J Hypertens 2007; 25: 951-8.