ESCADRA: a randomised study. Part I: lipid-lowering effectiveness, safety and tolerability of ezetimibe, initial doses of original statins, and the combination of ezetimibe with initial doses of statins in patients with coronary heart disease and hyperlipidemia

Aim. To study the lipid-lowering effectiveness, as well as the effects on inflammatory markers and vascular wall function, of ezetimibe as monotherapy and in combination with initial doses of original statins (simvastatin, atorvastatin, and rosuvastatin). Material and methods. The study included 60 male and female patients with coronary heart disease and hyperlipidemia. Mean age of the participants was 61,4 years; mean baseline level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-CH) was 4,1 mmol/l. The participants were randomised into four groups: ezetimibe monotherapy (10 mg/d) for 24 weeks, or statin monotherapy (simvastatin, atorvastatin, or rosuvastatin; 10 mg/d) for 12 weeks with following assessment of LDL-CH levels. If target levels were not achieved on statin monotherapy, a combination of ezetimibe and statins was administered for the next 12 weeks. The effects of monotherapy and combined therapy on lipid profile, C-reactive protein, pro-inflammatory cytokines, vascular elasticity and stiffness, as well as treatment tolerability, were assessed. Results. After 3 months of the treatment, LDL-CH levels in statin monotherapy groups decreased to 2,66-2,98 mmol/l. The decrease in LDL-CH concentration in ezetimibe group (-16,4 %) was significant. After 3 months, the percentage of the patients with achieved target LDL-CH levels was 17 % for ezetimibe, 42 % for simvastatin, 31 % for atorvastatin, and 58 % for rosuvastatin. After 6 months, the patients receiving combined therapy demonstrated LDL-CH reduction by 39,5-50,6 %. From Month 3 to Month 6, the additional lipid-lowering effect of ezetimibe, as a part of combined therapy, varied from 13 % to 25,9 %. Conclusion: Adding ezetimibe (10 mg/d) to any statins reduces LDL-CH levels by extra 20-30 %. Combined therapy was required in over 50 % of the patients. Therefore, the response to statin monotherapy is not universal and in one-third of the patients could be regarded as poor. In these individuals, the “double inhibition” approach (combining statins with ezetimibe 10 mg/d) could control LDL-CH levels more effectively.

1. Шальнова С.А., Деев А.Д. Характеристика пациентов высокого риска. Результаты эпидемиологической части научно-образовательной программы ОСКАР. Кардиоваск тер и профил 2006; 5(5): 58-63.

2. Диагностика и коррекция нарушений липидного обмена с целью профилактики и лечения атеросклероза. Российские рекомендации (ІV пересмотр). Кардиоваск тер и профил, 2009; 8(6). Приложение 3.

3. Kotseva K, Wood D, De Backer G, et al. EUROASPIRE III: a survey on the lifestyle, risk factors and use of cardioprotective drug therapies in coronary patients from 22 European countries. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009 Apr;16(2):121-37.

4. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults.Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001; 285(19): 2486-97.

5. Waters DD, Broton C, Chiang CW, et al. Lipid treatment assessment project 2: a multintionl survey to evaluate the proportion of patients achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals. Circulation 2009;120 (1):28-34.

6. Bays HE, Moore PB, Drehobl MA, et al. Effectiveness and tolerability of ezetimibe in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: pooled analysis of two phase II studies Clin Ther 2001. 23. 9, 1209-30.

7. Сусеков А.В., Зубарева М.Ю., Деев А.Д., и др. Основные результаты Московского Исследования по Статинам (Moscow Statin Survey, MSS). Сердце 2006; 5 (6):324-8.

8. Davidson MN, McGarry T, Bettis R et al. Ezetimibe coadministered with simvastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia JACC 2002. 40. 2125-34.

9. Jones P., Kafonek S., Laurora I.. Comparative dose efficacy study of atorvastatin versus simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin and fluvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolaemia (the CURVES Study) Am. J Cardiol 1998. 81 (5) 582-7.

10. Jones P, Davidson M, Stein E et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR Trial) Am J Cardiol 2003, 93, 152- 60.

11. Stender S, Schuster H, Barter P. et al. Comparison of rosuvastatin with atorvastatin, simvastatin and pravastatin in achieving cholesterol goals and improving plasma lipids in hypercholesterolaemic patients with or without the metabolic syndrome in the MERCURY I trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2005 7(4): 430-8

12. Andrews TC, Ballantyne CV, Hsia JA et al. Achieving and maintaining National Cholesterol Education Program low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals with five statins Am J Med 2001. 111 (3) 185-91.

13. Insull W, Kafonek S, Goldner D. Comparison of efficacy and safety of atorvastatin (10mg) with simvastatin (10mg) at six weeks. ASSET Investigators. Am J Cardiol. 2001, 87(5):554-9.

14. Olsson AG, Istad H, Luurila O et al. Effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin compared over 52 weeks of treatment in patients with hypercholesterolaemia Am Heart J 2002. 144. 1044-51.

15. Olsson AG, Pears J, McKellar J, et al. Effect of rosuvastatin on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with hypercholesterolaemia Am J Cardiol. 2001, 88 (5) p. 504-8.

16. Stein E, Lane M, Laskarzewski P et al. Comparison of Statins in Hypertriglycerideamia Am J Cardiol 1998, 81 (4A) 66B-9.

17. Grouse JR 3rd, Frohlich J, Ose L, et al. Effects of high doses of simvastatin and atorvastatin on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I. Am J Cardiol 1999, 83 (10)1476-77, A7.

18. Wierzbicki AS, Lumb PJ, Chick G, Crook MA. Comparison of therapy with simvastatin 80 mg and atorvastatin 80 mg in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia. Int J Clin Pract 1999. 53, 609-11.

19. Thompson GR, O’Neill F, Seed M. Why some patients respond poorly to statins and how this might be remedied. Eur Heart J 2002, 23(3):200-6.

20. van Himbergen, Matthan NR, Resteghini N et al. Comparison of the effects of maximal dose atorvastatin and rosuvastatin therapy on cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers. J Lipid Research 2009;50(4):730-9.Epub ahead a print.

21. Ballantyne CM, Houri J, Notarbartolo A, et al. Effect of ezetimibe coadministered with atorvastatin in 628 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial Circulation 2003, 107, 2409-15.

22. Sager P.T., Melani L., Lipka L. et al. Effect of coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein Am J Cardiol, 2003, 92, 1414-18.

23. Teoh H, Mendelsohn AA, Goodman SG, et al. Guidelines Based Undertaking for Improvement in Dyslipidemia Related Events (GUIDE) Investigators. Usefulness of statin-ezetimibe combination to reduce the care gap in dyslipidemia management in patients with a high risk of atherosclerotic disease. Am J Cardiol. 2009, 104(6):798-804.

24. Сусеков А.В., Зубарева М.Ю., Кухарчук В.В. Результаты наблюдательной программы по эзетролу “Исследование двух столиц”. Фарматека 2006; 8:59-64.

25. Farnier M, Averna M, Missault L. Lipid-altering efficacy of ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg compared with rosuvastatin 10 mg in high-risk hypercholesterolaemic patients inadequately controlled with prior statin monotherapy — The IN-CROSS study. Int J Clin Pract. 2009, 63(4):547-59.

26. Canon CP, Giugliano RP, Blazing MA et al.et al.Rationale and design of IMPROVE-IT (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial): comparison of ezetimibe/ simvastatin versus simvastatin monotherapy and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart 2008;156:826-32.

27. Califf R, Lokhnygina Y, Cannon CP, et al. An update on the IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (IMPROVE-IT) design.Am J Cardiol 2010; in press.