Features of cardiovascular remodeling, the level of neurohumoral factors depending on the degree of chronic heart failure and kidney dysfunction
https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2019-3-35-40
Abstract
Aim. To study the relationship between the level of the N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) and aldosterone in serum, cardiovascular remodeling parameters with the degree of chronic heart failure (CHF) and kidney dysfunction (KD).
Material and methods. Fifty two patients with coronary artery disease with CHF of I (19 patients), II (21) and III (12) functional classes (FC) were examined. All patients underwent echocardiography with assessment of systolic function and structural-geometric parameters of the left ventricle (LV), blood flow study at the level of the common carotid artery (CCA) with the determination of the thickness of the intim-media complex, velocity parameters of blood flow, resistance (RI) and pulsation (PI) indexes, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by CKD-ЕРI method, the level of NTproBNP and aldosterone in serum. The patients were divided depending on the eGFR elvel: 30< eGFR ≤60 ml/min/1,73 m2 — 14 patients, eGFR >60 ml/min/1,73 m2 — 38 patients.
Results. Patients with II FC CHF had the medium-high NTproBNP and aldosterone values. Subjects with FC III CHF had high levels of NTproBNP and aldosterone. A correlation relationship was found between the NTproBNP, aldosterone and ejection fraction (EF) levels (r=-0,70 and r=-0,72, respectively), between the NTproBNP, aldosterone and enddiastolic LV velocity (r=0,78 and r=0,70, respectively). There was a significant thickening of the carotid intima-media complex and a decrease in the blood flow velocity and an increase in vascular resistance with increasing CHF. We also noted a significant difference in the maximum end-diastolic velocity in patients with eGFR ≤60 ml/min/1,73 m2 compared with this indicator in patients with eGFR >60 ml/min/1,73 m2.
Conclusion. In patients with CHF, a significant increase in NTproBNP and aldosterone levels is associated with FC of CHF, LV systolic dysfunction and KD. The interrelation of cardiovascular remodeling indicators with the degree of CHF and KD was revealed.
Keywords
About the Authors
U. K. KamilovaUzbekistan
Tashkent
Z. D. Rasulova
Uzbekistan
Tashkent
G. A. Zakirova
Uzbekistan
Tashkent
B. B. Toshev
Uzbekistan
Tashkent
References
1. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2016. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(27):2129-200. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128.
2. Levy M, Wang V. The Framingham Heart Study and the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease: a historical perspective (fee required). Lancet. 2014;383(9921):999-1008. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61752-3.
3. Moiseev VS, Mukhina NA, Smirnov AV, et al. National recommendations. Cardiovascular risk and chronic kidney disease: cardiac nephroprotection strategies. Russ J Cardiol. 2014;(8):7-37. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2014-8-7-37.
4. Dienemann T, Fujii N, Orlandi P, et al. International Network of Chronic Kidney Disease cohort studies (iNET-CKD): a global network of chronic kidney disease cohorts. BMC Nephrol. 2016;17(1):121. doi:10.1186/s12882-016-0335-2.
5. Obrezan AG, Kulikov NV. Neurohumoral imbalance in chronic heart failure: classic and modern positions. Russ J Cardiol. 2017;(9):83-92. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2017-9-83-92.
6. Reznik EV, Gavrilov YuV, Nikitin IG. Algorithm for the management of patients with acute heart failure. Archive of internal medicine. 2018;8(4):247-59. (In Russ.) doi:10.20514/2226-6704-2018-8-4-247-259.
7. Kramer F, Sabbah HN, Januzzi JJ, Zannad F. Redefining the role of biomarkers in heart failure trials: expert consensus document. Heart Fail Rev. 2017;22(3):263-77. doi:10.1007/s10741-017-9608-5
8. Veldhuisen DJ, Linssen GC, Jaarsma T, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide and prognosis in heart failure patients with preserved and reduced ejection fraction. JACC. 2013;61:1498-506. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.044.
9. Burnasheva GA, Napalkov DA. Natriuretic peptides: use in modern cardiology. Bulletin of RAMS. 2015;70(5):568-72. (In Russ.) doi:10.15690/vramn.v70.i5.1443.
10. Vasyuk YA, Shkolnik EL. Strengths and limitations of modern echocardiography in cardiovascular disease diagnostics. Russ J Cardiol. 2013;(4):28-32. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2013-4-28-32.
11. Drapkina OM, Zyatenkova EV. Evaluation of cardiovascular remodeling and epicardial fat thickness in patients with chronic heart failure and metabolic syndrome. Therapeutic archive. 2016;2:64-70. (In Russ.) doi:10.17116/terarkh201688264-70.
12. Burchfield JS, Xie M, Hill JA. Pathological ventricular remodeling: mechanisms: part 1 of 2. Circulation. 2013;128(4):388-400. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001878.
13. Sarnak MJ, Bloom R, Muntner P, et al. KDOQI US commentary on the 2013 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Lipid Management in CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;65(3):354-66. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.10.005.
14. Mezhonov EM, Vyalkina YuA, Shalaev SV. The prevalence of renal dysfunction and its effect on the prognosis in patients with acute heart failure. Heart failure. 2017;18(2):87-93. (In Russ.) doi:10.18087/rhfj.2017.2.2306.
15. Diez J. Chronic heart failure as a state of reduced effectiveness of the natriuretic peptide system: implications for therapy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19(2):167-76. doi:10.1002/ejhf.656.
Review
For citations:
Kamilova U.K., Rasulova Z.D., Zakirova G.A., Toshev B.B. Features of cardiovascular remodeling, the level of neurohumoral factors depending on the degree of chronic heart failure and kidney dysfunction. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2019;18(3):35-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2019-3-35-40