Young ambulatory patients with cardiovascular diseases: age and gender characteristics, comorbidity, medication and outcomes (according to RECVASA register)
https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2019-6-99-106
Abstract
Aim. To assess age and gender characteristics and determine comorbidity, medication, and outcomes in young ambulatory patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) within the framework of an ambulatory prospective registry.
Material and methods. The study included 3690 patients with hypertension (HTN), coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AF), and combinations thereof, which applied to 3 Ryazan hospitals. Younger CVD patients (criterion 1 — the age of 18-49 years, criterion 2 — the age of men 18-54 years old and women 18-64 years old) were compared with older representatives. The presence of CVD and comorbidities, medication, and outcomes over 6 year follow-up were analyzed.
Results. The age groups of 18-49 years old and >50 years old included 347 (9,4%) and 3343 (90,6%) patients, respectively (men — 144 (41,5%) and 902 (27,0%), p<0,0001). According to criterion 2, 1369 (37,1%) people were assigned to the group of young CVD patients (men <55 years old — 254 (18,6%) and women <65 years old — 1115 (81,4%)). The older group included 2321 people (men — 792 (34,1%) and women — 1529 (65,9%)). In younger CVD patients (by criteria 1 and 2), the proportion of people with CAD, HF, AF, history of myocardial infarction (MI) and/or stroke, diabetes, respiratory and digestive diseases were significantly lower (p<0,001); there was also a lower proportion of people with cardiovascular multimorbidity. According to criterion 1, the proportion of younger people with >2 CVDs was 41%; according to criterion 2 — 62% (p<0,0001). Among patients <50 years of age, AF and stroke occurred in less than 5% of cases; MI was observed only in men. When using criteria 1 and 2 in patients with early CVD development compared with older patients, there was a larger proportion of obesity cases — 19,3% and 20,2% vs 13,8% and 10,8%, respectively (p=0,002 and p=0,019) and according to criterion 2, anemia cases — 10,2% and 7,1%, respectively (p=0,004). In younger patients, there were higher proportion of adequate medication — 70,9% and 68,8% vs 58,5% and 64,6% (p<0,001), lower mortality — 9,8% and 10,4% vs 30,8% and 39,7% (p<0,001). However, reinfarction incidence in men <50 years old was higher — 22,7% vs 12,4% (p=0,04).
Conclusion. In younger CVD patients compared with older patients, in accordance with criteria 1, there was a large proportion of men; in accordance with criteria 1 and 2 — lower incidence of CVD and noncardiac diseases, with the exception of obesity and anemia cases (only by criterion 2). Criterion 1 is more applicable for HTN, CAD, and CHF, while criterion 2 — for AF, stroke, and myocardial infarction. Younger CVD patients according to both criteria were characterized by a higher proportion of adequate medication, as well as lower mortality, the incidence of non-fatal stroke and CVD hospitalization. Men with MI history at the age of <50 years have higher reinfarction risk. CVD patients at the age of <50 years old are the target group for the prevention of cardiovascular multimorbidity and its progression.
About the Authors
E. Yu. AndreenkoRussian Federation
Moscow.
M. M. Lukyanov
Russian Federation
Moscow.
S. S. Yakushin
Russian Federation
Ryazan.
A. N. Vorobyev
Russian Federation
Ryazan.
E. V. Kudryashov
Russian Federation
Moscow.
I. S. Yavelov
Russian Federation
Moscow.
V. G. Klyashtorny
Russian Federation
Moscow.
K. G. Pereverzeva
Russian Federation
Ryazan.
S. A. Boytsov
Russian Federation
Moscow.
O. M. Drapkina
Russian Federation
Moscow.
References
1. Statistical materials “The incidence rate of adult population of Russia.” Ministry of health. http://mednet.ru/ru/statistika/zabolevaemost-naseleniya.html. (25 September 2019). (In Russ.)
2. Ageeva LI, Aleksandrova GA, Zajchenko NM, et al. Healthcare in Russia 2017. Federal State Statistics Service; 2017. (In Russ.)
3. Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, et al. 2016 European Guidelineson Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2315-81. doi:101093/eurheartj/ehw106.
4. Developed by the committee of experts of the Russian Society of Cardiology (RSC), Russian Society of Preventive Cardiology (RSPC) RS of N-CD. Cardiovascular prevention 2017. Russ J Cardiol. 2018;23(6):7-122. (In Russ.).
5. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021-104. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339.
6. Andersson C, Vasan RS. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in young individuals. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018;15:230-40. doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2017.154
7. Boytsov SA, Martsevich SY, Kutishenko NP, et al. Registers in cardiology: their principles, rules, and real-word potential. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2013; 12(1 ):4-9. (In Russ.)
8. Boytsov SA, Jakushin SS, Martsevich SYu, et al. Outpatient register of cardiovascular diseases in the Ryazan region (RECVASA): principal tasks, experience of development and first results. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2013;9(1):4-14. (In Russ.)
9. Zhernakova YV, Zheleznova EA, Chazova IE, et al. The prevalence of abdominal obesity and the association with socioeconomic status in Regions of the Russian Federation, the results of the epidemiological study — ESSE-RF. Ter Arkh. 2018;10:14-22. (In Russ.)
10. Matsis K, Holley A, Al-Sinan A, et al. Differing Clinical Characteristics Between Young and Older Patients Presenting with Myocardial Infarction. Hear Lung Circ. 2017;26(6):566-71. doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2016.09.007.
11. Wong CM, Hawkins NM, Jhund PS, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of young and very young adults with heart failure: The CHARM programme (Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity). JACC. 2013;62:1845-54. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.072.
12. Karasoy D, Bo Jensen T, Hansen ML et al. Obesity is a risk factor for atrial fibrillation among fertile young women: a nationwide cohort study. Europace. 2013;15(6):781-6. doi:10.1093/europace/eus422.
13. Turpie AG, Bauer KA, Eriksson BI, et al. Overweight and obesity as determinants of cardiovascular risk: The Framingham experience. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(16):1867-72. doi:10.1001/archinte.162.16.1867.
14. Fomin IV. СЬ|ГОПЮ heart failure in Russian federation: what do we know and what to do. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2016;(8):7-13. (In Russ.)
15. Maggioni AP, Anker SD, Dahlstrom U, et al. Are hospitalized or ambulatory patients with heart failure treated in accordance with European Society of Cardiology guidelines? Evidence from 12 440 patients of the ESC Heart Failure Long-Term Registry. Eur J Heart Failure. 2013;15:1173-84. doi:101093/eurjhf/hft134.
16. Komajda M, Kerneis M, Tavazzi L, et al. The chronic ischaemic cardiovascular disease ESC Pilot Registry: results of the six-month follow-up. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018;25:377-87. doi:10.1177/2047487317751955.
17. De Backer G, Jankowski P, Kotseva K, et al. Management of dyslipidaemia in patients with coronary heart disease: Results from the ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE V survey in 27 countries. Atherosclerosis. 2019;285:135-46. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.03.014.
18. Okshina EY, Loukianov MM, Martsevich SY, et al. Patients with History of Myocardial Infarction and Acute Cerebrovascular Accident in Clinical Practice: Demographic, Clinical Characteristics, Drug Treatment and Outcomes (Data of Outpatient and Hospital Registry REGION). Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2019;15(5):656-62. (In Russ.)
19. Loukianov MM, Martsevich SY, Drapkina OM, et al. The Therapy with Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Outpatient and Hospital Settings (Data from RECVASA Registries). Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2019; 15(4):538-45. (In Russ.)
20. Steinberg BA, Gao H, Shrader P, et al. International trends in clinical characteristics and oral anticoagulation treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation: Results from the GARFIELD-AF, ORBIT-AF I, and ORBIT-AF II registries. Am Heart J. 2017;194:132-40. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2017.08.011.
21. Fournier JA, Sanchez A, Quero J, et al. A. Myocardial Infarction in Men Aged 40 Years or Less: A Prospective Clinical-Angiographic Study. Clin Cardiol. 1996;19:631-6. doi:10.1002/clc.4960190809.
22. Moccetti T, Malacrida R, Pasotti E, et al. Epidemiologic variables and outcome of 1972 young patients with acute myocardial infarction: data from the GISSI-2 database. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(8):865-9. doi:10.1001/archinte.157.8.865.
23. Cole JH, Miller JI, Sperling LS, Weintraub WS. Long-term follow-up of coronary artery disease presenting in young adults. JACC. 2003;41(4):521-8. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02862-0.
24. Malmberg K, Bavenholm P, Hamsten, et al. Clinical and biochemical factors associated with prognosis after myocardial infarction at a young age. JACC. 1994;24(3):592-9. doi:0735-1097(94)90002-7.
Review
For citations:
Andreenko E.Yu., Lukyanov M.M., Yakushin S.S., Vorobyev A.N., Kudryashov E.V., Yavelov I.S., Klyashtorny V.G., Pereverzeva K.G., Boytsov S.A., Drapkina O.M. Young ambulatory patients with cardiovascular diseases: age and gender characteristics, comorbidity, medication and outcomes (according to RECVASA register). Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2019;18(6):99-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2019-6-99-106