Lipid-lowering therapy in patients with coronary artery disease in primary care practices: what has changed over 7 years?

Aim. To analyze changes in the pattern of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in outpatients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) over the 7-year period.

Material and methods. This pharmacoepidemiological, retrospective, cross-sectional, two-stage study was conducted on the basis of primary care facility of Moscow. We analyzed 1,834 and 805 medical records of patients with SCAD at the first (2011) and second (2018) stages, respectively. Data on demography, medical history, lipid profile, and administrated LLT were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics V16.0 and MS Excel. Differences were considered significant at p<0,05.

Results. Overall LLT prescription rate in outpatients with SCAD increased from 48,5 up to 86,4% (p<0,05) over the 7-year period. Statin monotherapy continued to prevail in the structure of LLT: its prescription rate increased from 48,2 up to 82,3% (p<0,05) in total sample. Use of statin/ezetimibe combination was registered only in 2018 (2,4% in LLT structure). Atorvastatin was the most frequently recommended medication at both study stages (51,5 vs 66,3%; p<0,05); prescription rate of simvastatin decreased from 44,5 to 3,9% (p<0,05), rosuvastatin — increased from 1,7 to 29,5% (p<0,05). Over the study period, the proportion of patients receiving high-intensity LLT increased (2,0 vs 41,8%; p<0,05). We also revealed a significant increase of patients who reached target levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (11,1 vs 23,3%; p<0,05) and total cholesterol (17,0 vs 33,0%; p<0,05).

Conclusion. The results demonstrated significant improvements in the LLT pattern over the 7-year period in outpatients with SCAD. Number of patients receiving statins doubled, and the cases of prescribing lowintensity LLT have become very rare. However, control of blood lipids in the target group remained inadequate.

1. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(3):407-77. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.

2. Fihn SD, Blankenship JC, Alexander KP, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS focused update of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149(3):e5-23. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.11.002.

3. Clinical recommendations “Stable coronary heart disease”. Ministry of Health of Russia; 2016. (In Russ.)

4. Murphy A, Palafox B, O’Donnell O, et al. Inequalities in the use of secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease by socioeconomic status: evidence from the PURE observational study. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(3):e292-e301. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30031-7.

5. Sorbets E, Fox KM, Elbez Y, et al. Long-term outcomes of chronic coronary syndrome worldwide: insights from the international CLARIFY registry. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(3):347-56. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz660.

6. Tolpygina SN, Marcevich SYu. Study FORECAST IHD. New data on remote monitoring. Profilakticheskaja medicina. 2016;19(1):30-6. (In Russ.) doi:10.17116/profmed201619130-36.

7. Fitilev SB, Shkrebneva II, Vozzhaev AV, et al. Lipid-lowering therapy in patients after myocardial infarction (pharmacoepidemiological study). Klin farmakol Ter. 2017;26(1):88-92. (In Russ.)

8. Cannon CP, Steinberg BA, Murphy SA, et al. Meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcomes trials comparing intensive versus moderate statin therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(3):438-45. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.070.

9. Fulcher J, O’Connell R, Voysey M, et al. Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: meta-analysis of individual data from 174,000 participants in 27 randomised trials. Lancet. 2015;385(9976):1397-405. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61368-4.

10. Karlson BW, Palmer MK, Nicholls SJ, et al. To what extent do high-intensity statins reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in each of the four statin benefit groups identified by the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines? A VOYAGER metaanalysis. Atherosclerosis. 2015;241(2):450-4. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.05.029.

11. Kumar A, Shariff M, Doshi R. Impact of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin on coronary atherosclerotic plaque volume — a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized control trials. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019:2047487319868035. doi:10.1177/2047487319868035.

12. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ ACPM/ ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(24):3168-209. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.002.

13. Diagnosis and treatment of stable angina pectoris. Russian recommendations by RSC. Supplement 4 of Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2008;7(6):1-40. (In Russ.)

14. Reiner Ž, De Backer G, Fras Z, et al. Lipid lowering drug therapy in patients with coronary heart disease from 24 European countries--Findings from the EUROASPIRE IV survey. Atherosclerosis. 2016;246:243-50. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.01.018.

15. De Backer G, Jankowski P, Kotseva K, et al. Management of dyslipidaemia in patients with coronary heart disease: Results from the ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE V survey in 27 countries. Atherosclerosis. 2019;285:135-46. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.03.014.

16. Martsevich SYu, Zharkova ED, Kutishenko NP, et al. An Attempt to Accord the Quality of Therapy of Stable Coronary Heart Disease Patients with Current Clinical Guidelines (ALIGN study): Design and the First Results. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2020;16(1):75-81. (In Russ.) doi:10.20996/1819-6446-2020-02-08.

17. Law MR, Wald NJ, Rudnicka AR. Quantifying effect of statins on low density lipoprotein cholesterol, ischaemic heart disease, and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003;326(7404):1423. doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1423

18. Rodriguez F, Maron DJ, Knowles JW, et al. Association Between Intensity of Statin Therapy and Mortality in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(1):47-54. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2016.4052.

19. Šimić I, Reiner Ž. Adverse effects of statins — myths and reality. Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21(9):1220-6. doi:10.2174/1381612820666141013134447.

20. Qian C, Wei B, Ding J, et al. Meta-analysis comparing the effects of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin on regression of coronary atherosclerotic plaques. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116(10):1521-6. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.08.010.

21. Lukina YV, Dmitrieva NA, Kutishenko NP, et al. The relationship and interinfluence of aspects of therapy safety and compliance in patients with cardiovascular diseases (by the data from outpatient registry “PROFILE”). Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2018;17(5):72-8. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2018-5-72-78.

22. Fofanova TV, Ageev FT, Smirnova MD, et al. Adherence to Therapy in the Outpatient Setting: the Ability to Identify and Assess the Effectiveness of Therapy. Kardiologiia. 2017;57(7):35-42. (In Russ.) doi:10.18087/cardio.2017.7.10004.