Preview

Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention

Advanced search

Prognostic significance of atherosclerosis of one or two vascular systems in patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk

https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2021-2669

Abstract

Aim. To study the prognostic significance of atherosclerosis of one and several vascular systems in patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk (CVR).

Material and methods. The study included 171 patients with high (26,9%) and very high (73,1%) CVR. All patients underwent duplex ultrasound of the carotid and lower limb arteries. The composite endpoint (CE) was cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and coronary revascularization.

Results. The follow-up period lasted 31,1 (17,8; 47,9) months. CE events occurred in 29 (16,9%) patients: cardiovascular death — 3 (1,75%) patients; nonfatal myocardial infarction — 7 (4,09%) patients; nonfatal stroke — 6 (3,51%) patients; coronary revascularization — 13 (7,60%) patients. Cumulative survival of patients with high and very high CVR with atherosclerotic plaques in the same vascular system did not significantly differ from that in patients with intact peripheral arteries (p=0,977). The event-free survival of patients with combined lesions of the carotid and lower limb arteries was significantly lower in comparison with patients with one vascular system involvement (p=0,011). The combined lesion of the carotid and lower limb arteries was associated with an increase in the relative risk (RR) of adverse cardiovascular events (RR, 3,15 (95% CI, 1,02-9,74; p=0,046), adjusted for sex, age, and peripheral arterial disease symptoms.

Conclusion. In patients with high and very high CVR, atherosclerotic lesion of two vascular systems of peripheral arteries is associated with an increase in the RR of adverse cardiovascular events, adjusted for sex, age, and peripheral arterial disease symptoms. The presence of atherosclerotic plaques in one vascular bed was not associated with an increase in the risk of CE events.

About the Authors

V. V. Genkel
South Ural State Medical University
Russian Federation

Chelyabinsk



A. S. Kuznetsova
South Ural State Medical University
Russian Federation

Chelyabinsk



E. V. Lebedev
South Ural State Medical University
Russian Federation

Chelyabinsk



I. I. Shaposhnik
South Ural State Medical University
Russian Federation

Chelyabinsk



References

1. Lazzeroni D, Coruzzi P. Risk stratification in secondary cardiovascular prevention. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2018;66(4):471-6. doi:10.23736/S0026-4725.18.04648-0.

2. Boitsov SA, Pogosova NV, Bubnova MG, et al. Cardiovascular prevention 2017 National guidelines. Russ J Cardiol. 2018;23(6):7-122. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2018-6-7-122.

3. Annemans L, Packard CJ, Briggs A, Ray KK. ‘Highest risk-hig-hest benefit’ strategy: a pragmatic, cost-effective approach to targeting use of PCSK9 inhibitor therapies. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(27):2546-50. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx710.

4. Kontsevaya AV, Mukaneeva DK, Myrzamatova AO, et al. Economic damage of risk factors associated with morbidity and mortality from major chronic non-communicable diseases in Russia in 2016. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2020;19(1):48-55. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2020-1-2396.

5. Kukharchuk VV, Ezhov MV, Sergienko IV, et al. Diagnostics and correction of lipid metabolism disorders in order to prevent and treat atherosclerosis. Russian recommendations. VII revision. Atherosclerosis and dyslipidemia. 2020;1(38):7-40. (In Russ.) doi:10.34687/2219-8202.JAD.2020.01.0002.

6. Blankstein R, Chandrashekhar Y. Extensive Coronary Artery Calcifications: No Longer Primary Prevention! JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:183-185. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.12.007.

7. Bonaca MP. Polyvascular disease and risk: When two is not better than one. Vasc Med. 2018;23(6):531-3. doi:10.1177/1358863X18796936.

8. Gutierrez JA, Mulder H, Jones WS, et al. Polyvascular Disease and Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Peripheral Artery Disease: A Secondary Analysis of the EUCLID Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(7):e185239. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5239.

9. Zhang Q, Wang A, Zhang S, et al. Asymptomatic polyvascular disease and the risks of cardiovascular events and allcause death. Atherosclerosis. 2017;262:1-7 doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.201704.015.

10. Barbarash OL, Kashtalap VV. A patient with aoronary artery disease and multifocal atherosclerosis. how to optimize the prognosis? Medical advice. 2018;(16):32-8. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21518/2079-701X-2018-16-32-38.

11. Aboyans V, Ricco JB, Bartelink MEL, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS): Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries Endorsed by: the European Stroke Organization (ESO)The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur Heart J. 2018;39(9):763-816. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx095.

12. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 2020;41 (1): 111-88. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455.

13. Sprynger M, Rigo F, Moonen M, et al.; EACVI Scientific Documents Committee. Focus on echovascular imaging assessment of arterial disease: complement to the ESC guidelines (PARTIM 1) in collaboration with the Working Group on Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19(11):1195-221. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jey103.

14. Rossello X, Bueno H, Pocock SJ, et al. Predictors of allcause mortality and ischemic events within and beyond 1 year after an acute coronary syndrome: results from the EPICOR registry. Clin Cardiol. 2019;42:111-9. doi:10.1002/clc.23116.

15. Rossello X, Dorresteijn JA, Janssen A, et al. Risk prediction tools in cardiovascular disease prevention: A report from the ESC Prevention of CVD Programme led by the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) in collaboration with the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association (ACCA) and the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP). Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019;26(14):1534-44. doi:10.1177/2047487319846715.

16. Calais F, Eriksson Ostman M, Hedberg P, et al. Incremental prognostic value of coronary and systemic atherosclerosis after myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2018;261:6-11. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.02.035.

17. 17 Eriksson Ostman M, Calais F, Rosenblad A, et al. Prognostic impact of subclinical or manifest extracoronary artery diseases after acute myocardial infarction. Atherosclerosis. 2017;263:53-9. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.05.027.

18. Miao B, Hernandez AV, Alberts MJ, et al. Incidence and Predictors of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Established Atherosclerotic Disease or Multiple Risk Factors. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(2):e014402. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014402.

19. Ershova AI, Boytsov SA, Drapkina OM, Balakhonova TV. Ultrasound markers of premanifest atherosclerosis of carotid and femoral arteries in assessment of cardiovascular risk. Russ J Cardiol. 2018;23(8):92-8. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2018-8-92-98.

20. Ershova AI, Balakhonova TV, Ivanova AA, et al. The problem of cardiovascular risk stratification depending on the severity of carotid and femoral artery atherosclerosis. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2020;19(2):2441. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2020-2441.

21. Genkel VV, Kuznetsova AS, Sumerkina VS, et al. The prognostic value of various carotid ultrasound parameters in patients at high and very high cardiovascular risk. Int J Cardiol. 2019;292:225-9. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.06.038.

22. Ihle-Hansen H, Vigen T, Ihle-Hansen H, et al. Prevalence of Carotid Plaque in a 63- to 65-Year-Old Norwegian Cohort From the General Population: The ACE (Akershus Cardiac Examination) 1950 Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(10):e008562. doi:10.1161/JAHA.118.008562.

23. Genkel VV, Salashenko AO, Shamaeva TN, et al. Atherosclerosis of peripheral arteries in patients with coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Therapeutic archive. 2019;91(10):54-62. (In Russ.) doi:10.26442/00403660.2019.10.000106.

24. Zhao Y, Evans MA, Allison MA, et al. Multisite atherosclerosis in subjects with metabolic syndrome and diabetes and relation to cardiovascular events: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2019;282:202-9. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.12.005.

25. Verma S, Mazer CD, Bhatt DL. The perils of polyvascular disease in type 2 diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(12):914-6. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30311-5.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Genkel V.V., Kuznetsova A.S., Lebedev E.V., Shaposhnik I.I. Prognostic significance of atherosclerosis of one or two vascular systems in patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2021;20(2):2669. https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2021-2669

Views: 1277


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1728-8800 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0125 (Online)