Preview

Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention

Advanced search

Role of stimulating growth factor 2 and galectin-3 in predicting the ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy

https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2021-2676

Abstract

Aim. To assess the role of stimulating growth factor 2 (ST-2) and galectin-3 in predicting the ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35%.

Material and methods. The study included 40 patients (men, 36 (90,0%); median age, 64,5 [57,5; 68,5] years) with CAD, NYHA class IIIII heart failure, LVEF <35%, indications for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (primary prevention of sudden cardiac death). Prior to ICD implantation, patients were measured for serum ST-2 and galectin-3 levels. For 18 months, patients were assessed for arrhythmic events recorded in the ICD memory.

Results. The 1st group consisted of 10 (25,0%) patients who had VTA episodes, arrested by antitachycardia pacing or shock during 18-month follow-up. The 2nd group consisted of 30 (75,0%) patients without VTA episodes. It was found that ST-2 concentration >22,48 ng/ml (p=0,02) and galectin-3 >10,95 ng/ml (p=0,009) corresponded to appropriate ICD discharge. Multivariate ROC analysis demonstrated that the only independent predictor of VTA was ST-2 elevation (odds ratio, 1,11; 95% CI, 1,01-1,21; p=0,023).

Conclusion. An increase in the concentration of both ST-2 >22,48 ng/ml and galectin-3 >10,95 ng/ml had a high predictive value in assessing the VTA risk in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. In multivariate analysis, an increase in ST-2 >22,48 ng/ml was an independent predictor of VTA.

About the Authors

T. A. Atabekov
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center
Russian Federation

Tomsk.



R. E. Batalov
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center
Russian Federation

Tomsk.



S. I. Sazonova
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center
Russian Federation

Tomsk.



A. M. Gusakova
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center
Russian Federation

Tomsk.



S. N. Krivolapov
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center
Russian Federation

Tomsk.



M. S. Khlynin
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center
Russian Federation

Tomsk.



S. V. Popov
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center
Russian Federation

Tomsk.



References

1. Oganov RG, Gerasimenko NF, Pogosova GV, et al. Cardiovascular prevention: development strategies. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2011;10(3):5-7. (In Russ.)

2. Ardashev AV, Arutyunov EG, Jelyakov EG, et al. The mechanisms and causes of sudden cardiac death. Risk factors and stratification in clinical practice. Basic definitions and terms. Clinical practice. 2014;4:3-12. (In Russ.)

3. Merchant FM, Jones P, Wehrenberg S, et al. Incidence of defibrillator shocks after elective generator exchange following uneventful first battery life. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(6):1-7. doi:10.1161/JAHA.114.001289.

4. Mueller T, Dieplinger B. Soluble ST2 and galectin-3: what we know and do not know analytically. EJIFCC. 2016;27(3):224-37.

5. Dieplinger B, Mueller T. Soluble ST2 in heart failure. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;443:57-70. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2014.09.021.

6. Sabatine M, Morrow D, Higgins L, et al. Complementary roles for biomarkers of biomechanical strain ST2 and N-terminal prohormone B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2008;117(15):1936-44. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.728022.

7. Hughes MF, Appelbaurn S, Havulinna AS, et al. ST2 may not be useful predictor for incident cardiovascular events, heart failure and mortality. Heart. 2014;100(21):1715-21. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305968.

8. Bayes-Genis A, de Antonio M, Vila J, et al. Head-to-head comparison of two myocardial fibrosis biomarkers for long-term heart failure risk stratification: ST2 versus galectin-3. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(2):158-66. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.087.

9. Mueller T, Gegenhuber A, Leitner I, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of galectin-3 and soluble ST2 for acute heart failure. Clin Chim Acta. 2016;463:158-64. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2016.10.034.

10. Grakova EV, Teplyakov AT, Kopieva KV, et al. Prediction role of a novel biomarker ST2 in risk assessment of adverse cardiovascular events in chronic heart failure with preserved and intermediate ejection fraction after myocardial revascularization. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2018;17(5):40-6. (In Russ.)

11. Pascual-Figal DA, Ordonez-Llanos J, Tornel PL, et al. Soluble ST2 for predicting sudden cardiac death in patients with chronic heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(23):2174-9. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.041.

12. Skali H, Gerwein R, Meyer TE, et al. Soluble ST-2 and risk of arrhythmias, heart failure, or death in patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure: results from MADIT-CRT. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2016;9(5-6):421-8. doi:10.1007/s12265-016-9713-1.

13. Mozos I. Laboratory markers of ventricular arrhythmia risk in renal failure. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:509204. doi:10.1155/2014/509204.

14. de Boer RA, Voors AA, Muntendam P, et al. Galectin-3: a novel mediator of heart failure development and progression. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009;11(9):811-7. doi:10.1093/eurjhf/hfp097.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Atabekov T.A., Batalov R.E., Sazonova S.I., Gusakova A.M., Krivolapov S.N., Khlynin M.S., Popov S.V. Role of stimulating growth factor 2 and galectin-3 in predicting the ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2021;20(3):2676. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2021-2676

Views: 653


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1728-8800 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0125 (Online)