Changes in NT-proBNP levels in patients with sinus tachycardia after COVID-19
https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2022-3485
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the changes of the N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration in patients with sinus tachycardia after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during ivabradine monotherapy or in combination with β-blockers (BBs) compared to BB monotherapy.
Material and methods. This randomized comparative study included 90 patients discharged from the hospital after an acute period of COVID-19. The main group (n=60) included patients who received ivabradine monotherapy or in combination with BB in addition to standard therapy, while the control group (n=30) — standard therapy in combination with BB. The follow-up period lasted 24 weeks. Serum NT-proBNP concentration was determined by enzyme immunoassay at the first and last visit (0 and 24 weeks). Statistical processing was performed using STATISTICA 8.0 software. The level of statistical significance was p<0,05.
Results. A significant decrease in heart rate (HR) and NT-proBNP concentration was noted in both groups. The achievement rate of maximum recommended BB doses was 9,1% in the main group and 20% in the control group. Among individuals who did not achieve the maximum recommended doses of BB, the HR and NT-proBNP concentration were significantly higher in the control group as follows: 72 [66; 75] vs 68 [66; 75] bpm (p=0,028) and 55,5 [47,3; 88,8] vs 43,3 [31,0; 55,5] pg/ml, respectively (p=0,041).
Conclusion. We showed that therapy with ivabradine and betablockers helps to reduce the level of NT-proBNP against the background of HR decrease in patients after COVID-19, and ivabradine allows to achieve a more pronounced decrease in heart rate and NT-proBNP level in patients with failure to achieve the maximum recommended BB doses.
Keywords
About the Authors
V. I. PodzolkovRussian Federation
Moscow
A. E. Bragina
Russian Federation
Moscow
A. I. Tarzimanova
Russian Federation
Moscow
T. S. Vargina
Russian Federation
Moscow
E. S. Ogibenina
Russian Federation
Moscow
I. I. Shvedov
Russian Federation
Moscow
E. E. Bykova
Russian Federation
Moscow
A. A. Ivannikov
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Shlyakho EV, Konradi AO, Arutyunov GP, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of circulatory diseases in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(3):3801. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3-3801.
2. Podzolkov VI, Bragina AE, Tarzimanova AI, et al. Post-COVID Syndrome and Tachycardia: Theoretical Base and Treatment Experience. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2021;17(2):256-62. (In Russ.) doi:10.20996/1819-6446-2021-04-08.
3. Jadhav K, Jariwala P. ‘Ivabradin’ versus ‘Carvedilol’ in the management of Post-COVID-19 palpitation with sinus tachycardia. Indian Heart J. 2020;72:S33. doi:10.1016/j.ihj.2020.11.092.
4. Ståhlberg M, Reistam U, Fedorowski A, et al. Post-COVID-19 Tachycardia Syndrome: A Distinct Phenotype of Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome. Am J Med. 2021;134(12):1451-6. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.07.004.
5. Caro-Codón J, Rey JR, Buño A, et al. Characterization of NTproBNP in a large cohort of COVID-19 patients. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021;23(3):456-64. doi:10.1002/ejhf.2095.
6. Cao R, Bai Y, Xu R, et al. Association between resting heart rate and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in a communitybased population study in Beijing. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;10:5560. doi:10.2147/CIA.S66971.
7. Podzolkov VI, Tarzimanova AI, Bragina AE, et al. Damage to the Cardiovascular System in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Infection. Part 1: предикторы развития неблагоприятного прогноза. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2021;17(6):825-30. (In Russ.) doi:10.20996/1819-6446-2021-11-03.
8. Podzolkov VI, Bragina AE, Tarzimanova AI, et al. Comparative efficacy of ivabradine and beta-blockers in the treatment of tachycardia in patients after COVID-19. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2022;21(7):3330. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2022-3330.
9. Romero-Sánchez CM, Díaz-Maroto I, Fernández-Díaz E, et al. Neurologic manifestations in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: The ALBACOVID registry. Neurology. 2020;95(8):e1060-70. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000009937.
10. Dogheim GM, Khairat I, Omran GA, et al. Clinical comparative study assessing the effect of ivabradine on neopterin and NT-Pro BNP against standard treatment in chronic heart failure patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022;78:943-54. doi:10.1007/s00228-022-03290-6.
11. Zugck C, Martinka P, Stöckl G. Ivabradine treatment in a chronic heart failure patient cohort: symptom reduction and improvement in quality of life in clinical practice. Adv Ther. 2014;31(9):961-74. doi:10.1007/s12325-014-0147-3.
12. Ptaszynski P, Kaczmarek K, Ruta J, et al. Metoprolol succinate vs. ivabradine in the treatment of inappropriate sinus tachycardia in patients unresponsive to previous pharmacological therapy. Europace. 2013;15(1):116-21. doi:10.1093/europace/eus204.
13. Calò L, Rebecchi M, Sette A, et al. Efficacy of ivabradine administration in patients affected by inappropriate sinus tachycardia. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7(9):1318-23. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.05.034.
14. Hidalgo FJ, Anguita M, Castillo JC, et al. Effect of early treatment with ivabradine combined with beta-blockers versus beta-blockers alone in patients hospitalized with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (ETHICAHF): A randomized study. Int J Cardiol. 2016;217:7-11. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.136.
15. Hori M, Imamura T, Nakamura M, et al. Implication of Ivabradine in Up-titrating Beta-blocker in a Patient with Advanced Heart Failure. Intern Med. 2021;60(6):897-900. doi:10.2169/internalmedicine.6061-20.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Podzolkov V.I., Bragina A.E., Tarzimanova A.I., Vargina T.S., Ogibenina E.S., Shvedov I.I., Bykova E.E., Ivannikov A.A. Changes in NT-proBNP levels in patients with sinus tachycardia after COVID-19. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2022;21(12):3485. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2022-3485