Conflict competence of students of the educational environment of a higher educational establishment: a study of the formation dynamics
https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2022-3486
Abstract
Aim. To present the system-level structure of conflict competence and study the interrelations and differences in its components in students in the context of studying at a university.
Material and methods. The study involved 150 1-4-year students. According to the factor analysis of psychological variables, 5 empirically represented groups of parameters were identified, con sidered as conflict competence. The empirical study used psychodiagnostic techniques aimed at determining strategies of behavior in conflict situations; personal aggressiveness and conflict; style of self-regulation of behavior; communicative tolerance; level of development of reflexivity and the technique of coping mechanisms.
Results. According to Kruskal-Wallis H test, there were differences in 3 competencies: sthenic intrapersonal-oriented conflict readiness; interpersonal-oriented conflict competence; intrapersonal con-flictogenity. There were no significant differences in emotive-personal conflict readiness and constructive-activity conflict competence.
An analysis of the prevalence of high level of conflict competence formation showed that in 1st-year students, emotive-personal conflict readiness prevails, in the 2nd year — constructive-activity competence, in 3rd year — intrapersonal conflictogenity, in 4th — interpersonal-oriented competence. Thus, the period of study at a university can be considered as a stage in the formation of conflict competences.
Conclusion. The data obtained make it possible to identify five conflict competences, reflecting the motivational, cognitive and behavioral components of conflict tolerance and conflict readiness, which ensure the perception and analysis of conflict situations, the organization of behavior and communication in conflict situations and the willingness to solve them; the resulting five-factor statistical conflict competence model details the proposed two-factor theoretical model and refines it in terms of mechanisms. A comparative analysis of representation of conflict competences among 1-4-year students determined the competence dynamics as follows: from conflict instability to conflict readiness, which allows to clarify the existing ideas about the stages and features of competence formation under the influence of educational activities at the university.
About the Authors
I. V. BelashevaRussian Federation
Stavropol
M. I. Plugina
Russian Federation
Stavropol
M. L. Esayan
Russian Federation
Stavropol
References
1. Glasl F. Konfliktmanagement: Ein Handbuch fur Fuhrungskrafte, Beraterinnen und Berater. Bern: Haupt Verlag. Stuttgart: Verlag Freies Geistesleben, 2004, 523 c. ISBN: 978-3-531-92789-3.
2. Beck R, Schwarz G. Konfliktmanagement. Augsburg: Ziel Verlag. 2000.
3. Melchuk AS. Conflictological training of civil service personnel: acmeological aspect. The world of psychology. Scientific and methodological journal. 2005;2:77-84. (In Russ.)
4. Miller L, Rankin N, Neathy F. Competency frameworks in UK organisations: key issues in employers' use of competencies. L.: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, 2001.
5. Bogdanov EN, Zazikin VG. Psychology of personality in conflict. St. Petersburg: Peter, 2004, 224 p. (In Russ.)
6. Egorova MS. The study of the development of individual differences in psychology. Psychological research. 2014;7(36): 12. (In Russ.) EDN THSVTP.
7. Hasan BI. Constructive psychology of conflict: a textbook for undergraduate and graduate studies. B. I. Hasan. 2nd ed., erased. Moscow: Yurayt Publishing House, 2019. 204c. (Author's textbook). (In Russ.)
8. Shadrikov VD. Human abilities and giftedness: Monograph. M.: Publishing house "Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences", 2019. 274 p. (In Russ.)
9. Hoffmann T. The meanings of competency. Journal of European Industrial Training. 1999;23(6):275-86.
10. Deist le DFO, Winterton J. What Is Competence? Human Resource Development International. 2005;8(1):27-46.
11. Zimnaya IA. Key competencies as the effective-target basis of the competence approach in education. Author's version. M.: Research Center for Quality problems of training specialists, 2004, p. 24. (In Russ.)
12. Boltunova GM, Belova TV. Formation of bachelor students' readiness to resolve conflicts in the educational process of a preschool educational institution. Bulletin of the Tyumen State University. Humanitarian studies. Humanitatis. 2015;1(2):203-13. (In Russ.)
13. Cazal D, Dietrich A. Competences et savoirs: quels concepts pour quelles instumentations. Gerer les Competences: des Instruments aux Processus. A. Klarsfeld and E. Oiry (Eds). Paris: Vuibert, 2003, р. 241-62.
14. Komalova LR. Linguistic research of conflictological competence (Based on the material of the educational module "Organizational conflict management"). Conflicts in Modern Russia: Research and Regulation: Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, Moscow: Publishing House of SSU, 2010, pp. 135-41. (In Russ.)
15. Shcherbakova OI. Formation and development of conflictological culture of a specialist in contextual learning. Psychopedagogy in law enforcement agencies. 2009;3(38):15-9. (In Russ.)
16. Mityaeva AM. On the need to form the conflictological competence of participants in the educational process at the university. Social work in a crisis: materials of the 2nd All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, April 22, 2010, Russian State Prof.-ped. un-T. Yekaterinburg: Publishing House of RGPPU, 2010, pp. 62-64. (In Russ.)
17. Ilyin EP. Motivation and motives. St. Petersburg: Peter, 2011, 512 p. (In Russ.)
18. Grishina NV. Psychology of conflict. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg, 2008, 544 p. (In Russ.)
19. Morosanova VI, Kondratyuk NG. V. I. Morosanova's questionnaire "The style of self-regulation of behavior of SSPM-2020". Questions of psychology. 2020;4:155-67. (In Russ.) EDN XLPKCR.
20. Wasserman LI, Shchelkova OY. Medical psychodiagnostics. Theory, practice and training. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg, 2005, 84 p. (In Russ.)
21. Boyko VV. Energy of emotions: Emotions in communication. Emotions in the manifestations of personality. The creative and destructive power of emotions. Techniques for studying emotions. 2nd ed., add. and reprint. M. 2004 (GP Tech. kn.). 473 p. (In Russ.)
22. Karpov AV. Reflexivity as a mental property and the method of its diagnosis. Psychological journal. 2003;24(5):45-57. (In Russ.). EDN OOYBSN.
Review
For citations:
Belasheva I.V., Plugina M.I., Esayan M.L. Conflict competence of students of the educational environment of a higher educational establishment: a study of the formation dynamics. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2022;21(4S):3486. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2022-3486