Preview

Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention

Advanced search

Prognostic value of socioeconomic parameters among the Russian population aged 25-64: results of a population-based study

https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2024-4226

EDN: JKYCAC

Abstract

Aim. To assess the contribution of individual socioeconomic parameters to the risk of death and cardiovascular events among Russian men and women aged 25-64, according to epidemiological study data.

Material and methods. The study was based on data from the prospective study ESSE-RF (2013-2014) and ESSE-RF2 (2017), which included a total of 22812 participants aged 25-64 years from 14 regions. The analysis assessed the following sociodemographic parameters: marital status, education level, income, employment, and type of settlement. From 2013 to 2021, 688 participants died. The composite endpoint (CE), including fatal and non-fatal (myocardial infarction and/or cerebrovascular accident) cardiovascular events, was registered in 470 (4,6%) men and 380 (2,4%) women. Associations with endpoints were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models with corresponding hazard ratios (HR).

Results. According to multivariate analysis, the following parameters were significantly associated with the all-cause death risk in the male population: non-marriage (HR 1,86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1,48-2,33), no higher education (HR 1,34, 95% CI: 1,08-1,67), low income (HR 1,32, 95% CI: 1,06-1,63), non-employment (HR 1,97, 95% CI: 1,58-2,46); with CE — no higher education (HR 1,64, 95% CI: 1,34-2,01), nonemployment (HR 1,49, 95% CI: 1,21-1,84). In the population of women, a reliable contribution to all-cause death risk and CE occurrence was made by the lack of higher education and non-employment — HR 1,54, 95% CI: 1,17-2,04; HR 1,64, 95% CI: 1,26-2,14; HR 1,35, 95% CI: 1,07-1,71; HR 1,38, 95% CI: 1,1-1,73, respectively.

Conclusion. The study results indicate that the most unfavorable prognostic factors in relation to death risk and fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events are the lack of higher education and nonemployment, regardless of sex and region of residence.

About the Authors

A. E. Imaeva
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Moscow



Yu. A. Balanova
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Moscow



L. I. Gomanova
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Moscow



V. A. Kutsenko
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Moscow



N. A. Imaeva
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Moscow



B. M. Nazarov
OOO Healthy Family
Russian Federation

Moscow



A. V. Kapustina
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Moscow



S. E. Evstifeeva
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Moscow



G. A. Muromtseva
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Moscow



S. A. Shalnova
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Moscow



O. M. Drapkina
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Moscow



References

1. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, et al. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(1):7-12. doi:10.1136/jech.2004.023531.

2. Turrell G, Lynch JW, Leite C, et al. Socioeconomic disadvantage in childhood and across the life course and all-cause mortality and physical function in adulthood: evidence from the Alameda County Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61(8):723-30. doi:10.1136/jech.2006.050609.

3. Imaeva AE, Kapustina AV, Balanova YuA, et al. Do childhood conditions of life influence cognition at adult age? Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2018;(6):147-51. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2018-6-147-151.

4. Muennig P, Kuebler M, Kim J, et al. Gender differences in material, psychological, and social domains of the income gradient in mortality: implications for policy. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59191. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059191.

5. Corna LM. A life course perspective on socioeconomic inequalities in health: a critical review of conceptual frameworks. Adv Life Course Res. 2013;18(2):150-9. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2013.01.002.

6. Chashchin VP, Askarov RA, Lakman IA, et al. Integral assessment of the effects of socio-economic and ecological factors on mortality. Human Ecology. 2020;27(4):4-11. (In Russ.) doi:10.33396/1728-0869-2020-4-4-11.

7. Pastukhova EYa. The relationship of public health and socioeconomic factors: evidence from the siberian regions of Russia. Regional Economics: Theory and Practice. 2016;10(433):180-9. (In Russ.)

8. Samorodskaia IV, Barbarash OL, Kondrikova NV, et al. Relationship between socioeconomic factors and mortality rates in the population. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2017;20(1):10-4. (In Russ.) doi:10.17116/profmed201720110-14.

9. Nauchno-organizatsionnyĭ komitet proekta ÉSSE-RF. Epidemiology of cardiovascular diseases in different regions of Russia (ESSE-RF). The rationale for and design of the study. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2013;16(6):25-34. (In Russ.)

10. Shalnova SA, Balanova YuA, Vilkov VG, et al. How to interpret and use the results of epidemiological studies in healthcare practice. Methodological Rationale. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2022;21(11):3475. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2022-3475.

11. Tatangelo G, McCabe M, Campbell S, et al. Gender, marital status and longevity. Maturitas. 2017;100:64-9. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.03.002.

12. Chin B, Murphy MLM, Janicki-Deverts D, et al. Marital status as a predictor of diurnal salivary cortisol levels and slopes in a community sample of healthy adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017;78:68-75. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.01.016.

13. Sephton SE, Lush E, Dedert EA, et al. Diurnal cortisol rhythm as a predictor of lung cancer survival. Brain Behav Immun. 2013;30 Suppl:S163-70. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2012.07.019.

14. Umberson D. Gender, marital status and the social control of health behavior. Soc Sci Med. 1992;34(8):907-17. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90259-s.

15. Wang Y, Jiao Y, Nie J, et al. Sex differences in the association between marital status and the risk of cardiovascular, cancer, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 7,881,040 individuals. Glob Health Res Policy. 2020;5:4. doi:10.1186/s41256-020-00133-8.

16. Staehelin K, Schindler C, Spoerri A, et al. Marital status, living arrangement and mortality: does the association vary by gender? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(7):e22. doi:10.1136/jech.2010.128397.

17. Luy M, Zannella M, Wegner-Siegmundt C, et al. The impact of increasing education levels on rising life expectancy: a decomposition analysis for Italy, Denmark, and the USA. Genus. 2019;75(1):11. doi:10.1186/s41118-019-0055-0.

18. Khar’kova TL, Nikitina SYu, Andreev EM. Dependence of life expectancy on the education levels in Russia. Voprosy statistiki. 2017;(8):61-9. (In Russ.)

19. IHME-CHAIN Collaborators. Effects of education on adult mortality: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2024;9(3):e155-65. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00306-7.

20. Dolgalev IV, Ivanova AYu, Karpov RS. Influence of educational level on the risk of general and cardiovascular mortality according to the results of a 27-year prospective cohort study. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2020;23(6):22-7. (In Russ.) doi:10.17116/profmed20202306122.

21. Pokida AN, Zybunovskaya NV, Gazieva IA. The Role of Higher Education in the Formation of a Healthy Lifestyle: Results of Sociological Research. Higher Education in Russia. 2022;31(1): 72-88. (In Russ.) doi:10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-1-72-88.

22. Van Hedel K, van Lenthe FJ, Oude Groeniger J, et al. What's the difference? A gender perspective on understanding educational inequalities in all-cause and cause-specific mortality. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1105. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5940-5.

23. Braveman P, Gottlieb L. The social determinants of health: it's time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Rep. 2014;129(Suppl 2):19-31. doi:10.1177/00333549141291S206.

24. Bosworth B. Increasing Disparities in Mortality by Socioeconomic Status. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39:237-51. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014615.

25. Chetty R, Stepner M, Abraham S, et al. The Association Between Income and Life Expectancy in the United States, 2001-2014. JAMA. 2016;315(16):1750-66. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.4226.

26. Muntaner C, Solar O, Vanroelen C, et al. Unemployment, informal work, precarious employment, child labor, slavery, and health inequalities: pathways and mechanisms. Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(2):281-95. doi:10.2190/HS.40.2.h.

27. Vanthomme K, Gadeyne S. Unemployment and cause-specific mortality among the Belgian working-age population: The role of social context and gender. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0216145. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216145.

28. Vågerö D, Garcy AM. Does unemployment cause long-term mortality? Selection and causation after the 1992-96 deep Swedish recession. Eur J Public Health. 2016;26(5):778-83. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckw053.

29. Paglione L, Angelici L, Davoli M, et al. Mortality inequalities by occupational status and type of job in men and women: results from the Rome Longitudinal Study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(6):e033776. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033776.

30. Cossman JS, James WL, Cosby AG, et al. Underlying causes of the emerging nonmetropolitan mortality penalty. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(8):1417-9. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.174185.

31. Rees-Punia E, Deubler E, Patel AV, et al. The Role of IndividualLevel Factors in Rural Mortality Disparities. AJPM Focus. 2022;1(1):100013. doi:10.1016/j.focus.2022.100013.

32. Johnston KJ, Wen H, Joynt Maddox KE. Lack Of Access To Specialists Associated With Mortality And Preventable Hospitalizations Of Rural Medicare Beneficiaries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019;38(12):1993-2002. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00838.

33. Do R, Willer CJ, Schmidt EM, et al. Common variants associated with plasma triglycerides and risk for coronary artery disease. Nat Genet. 2013;45(11):1345-52. doi:10.1038/ng.2795.


Supplementary files

What is already known about the subject?

  • The concepts of "socioeconomic status" and "so­cioeconomic parameters" are widely used in health re­search, which indicates recognition of their im­por­tance for various health indicators.
  • Previously conducted epidemiological studies have shown that in the general population, the death risk increases as the individual's socioeconomic status in society worsens.

What might this study add?

  • Individual socioeconomic characteristics are pro­gnostically unfavorable in relation to the risk of death and fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events.
  • Public health professionals and medical specialists should pay more attention to increasing the popu­la­tion's health literacy.

Review

For citations:


Imaeva A.E., Balanova Yu.A., Gomanova L.I., Kutsenko V.A., Imaeva N.A., Nazarov B.M., Kapustina A.V., Evstifeeva S.E., Muromtseva G.A., Shalnova S.A., Drapkina O.M. Prognostic value of socioeconomic parameters among the Russian population aged 25-64: results of a population-based study. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2024;23(12):4226. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2024-4226. EDN: JKYCAC

Views: 174


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1728-8800 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0125 (Online)