Atria platform as a tool for implementing employee wellness programs within the National Projects of the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2024-4232
EDN: RWGUQL
Abstract
The optimal model for preventing noncommunicable diseases and increasing healthy life expectancy are Employee wellness programs. Unified domestic approach to implementation of employee wellness programs, including using digital technologies, contribute to their widespread implementation in Russian regions. This article describes in detail the stages of development and application of the Atria digital platform in most Russian regions. This is a domestic tool for the development and assessment of employee wellness programs, created by the National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine with the support of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.
Supporting agencies: none
About the Authors
A. V. Kontsevaya
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
A. A. Antsiferova
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
E. S. Ivanova
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
O. M. Drapkina
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Lebedeva-Nesevrya NA, Tsinker MYu, Plotnikova EB, et al. Workers’ health as a factor of social economic modernization of territory. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2016;(12):15-20. (In Russ.)
2. Kiseleva LS. Health as a special economic resource: theoretical review. Economics: yesterday, today, tomorrow. 2016;3:217-24. (In Russ.)
3. Cen ST, Yan WH. Economic Growth, People's Livelihood Preferences of Local Governments and Residents' Health. Front Public Health. 2022;10:844015. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.844015.
4. Kontsevaia AV, Myrzamatova AO, Mukaneeva DK, et al. The economic burden of main non-communicable diseases in the Russian Federation in 2016. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2019; 22(6):18-23. (In Russ.) doi:10.17116//profmed20192206118.
5. Drapkina OM, Kontsevaya AV, Kalinina AM, et al. Prevention of chronic non-communicable diseases in Of the Russian Federation. National guidelines. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2022;21(4):3235. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2022-3235.
6. Kontsevaya AV, Mukaneeva DK, Ignatieva VI, et al. Economics of cardiovascular prevention in the Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2023;28(9):5521. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5521.
7. Reeves A, Basu S, McKee M, et al. Does investment in the health sector promote or inhibit economic growth? Global Health. 2013;9:43. doi:10.1186/1744-8603-9-43.
8. OECD. Promoting Health and Well-being at Work: Policy and Practices, OECD Health Policy Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris. 2022. doi:10.1787/e179b2a5-en.
9. Vargas-Martínez AM, Romero-Saldaña M, De Diego-Cordero R. Economic evaluation of workplace health promotion interventions focused on Lifestyle: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2021;77(9):3657-91. doi:10.1111/jan.14857.
10. Drapkina ОM, Kotova MB, Maksimov SA, et al. Adherence to a healthy lifestyle in Russia according to the ESSE-RF study: is there a COVID-19 trace? Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2023;22(8S):3788. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2023-3788.
11. Murray E, Hekler EB, Andersson G, et al. Evaluating Digital Health Interventions: Key Questions and Approaches. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(5):843-51. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.008.
12. Soobiah C, Cooper M, Kishimoto V, et al. Identifying optimal frameworks to implement or evaluate digital health interventions: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2020;10(8):e037643. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037643.
13. Guo C, Ashrafian H, Ghafur S, et al. Challenges for the evaluation of digital health solutions — A call for innovative evidence generation approaches. npj Digit Med. 2020;3(110). doi:10.1038/s41746-020-00314-2.
14. Antsiferova AA, Kontsevaya AV, Ivanova ES, et al. Digital technologies in corporate health promotion programs: international and domestic experience. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2023;26(11):116-21. (In Russ.) doi:10.17116/profmed202326111116.
15. Jimenez P, Bregenzer A. Integration of eHealth Tools in the Process of Workplace Health Promotion: Proposal for Design and Implementation. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(2):e65. doi:10.2196/jmir.8769.
16. Jandoo T. WHO guidance for digital health: What it means for researchers. Digit Health. 2020;6:2055207619898984. doi:10.1177/2055207619898984.
17. Kowatsch T, Otto L, Harperink S, et al. A design and evaluation framework for digital health interventions it — Information Technology. 2019;61(5-6):253-63. doi:10.1515/itit-2019-0019.
18. Carolan S, de Visser RO. Employees' Perspectives on the Facilitators and Barriers to Engaging With Digital Mental Health Interventions in the Workplace: Qualitative Study. JMIR Ment Health. 2018;5(1):e8. doi:10.2196/mental.9146.
19. Haile C, Kirk A, Cogan N, et al. Pilot Testing of a Nudge-Based Digital Intervention (Welbot) to Improve Sedentary Behaviour and Wellbeing in the Workplace. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(16):5763. doi:10.3390/ijerph17165763.
20. Kazi AM, Qazi SA, Ahsan N, et al. Current Challenges of Digital Health Interventions in Pakistan: Mixed Methods Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(9):e21691. doi:10.2196/21691.
21. Kechagias EP, Papadopoulos GA, Rokai I. Evaluating the Impact of Digital Health Interventions on Workplace Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Adm Sci. 2024;14:131. doi:10.3390/admsci14060131.
22. Havermans BM, Boot CR, Brouwers EP, et al. Effectiveness of a digital platform-based implementation strategy to prevent work stress in a healthcare organization: a 12-month follow-up controlled trial. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018;44(6):613-21. doi:10.5271/sjweh.3758.
23. Adhyaru JS, Kemp C. Virtual reality as a tool to promote wellbeing in the workplace. Digit Health. 2022;8. doi:10.1177/20552076221084473.
24. Kontsevaya AV, Antsiferova AA, Ivanova ES, et al. Development of the set of tools and implementation of workplace well-being programs in enterprises. Ekologiya cheloveka (Human Ecology). 2021;7:58-64. (In Russ.) doi:10.33396/1728-0869-2021-7-58-64.
25. Antsiferova AA, Kontsevaya AV, Khudyakov MB, et al. Experience in implementing workplace wellbeing programs in Russia: results of a survey of employers on the ATRIA platform. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2022;21(6):3266. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/17288800-2022-3266.
26. Antsiferova AA, Kontsevaya AV, Ivanova ES, et al. Workplace wellbeing programs: factors of the work process and maintaining a healthy lifestyle. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2022;25(10):61-70. (In Russ.) doi:10.17116/profmed20222510161.
27. Antsiferova AA, Lopatina MV, Kontsevaya AV, et al. Health literacy, including related vaccination, of the working Russian population: data from a survey on the Atria platform. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2024;23(8):4112. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2024-4112.
28.
Supplementary files
What is already known about the subject?
- Employee wellness programs are the optimal model for preventing noncommunicable diseases and increasing healthy life expectancy among the working age population.
- A large number of digital tools and technologies have been developed to change health behavior, but they do not support the entire process, including administration, data collection, evaluation and development of targeted interventions.
What might this study add?
- With support at the state level, a tool for the implementation and evaluation of employee wellness programs was developed — the Atria digital platform (https://atriya.gnicpm.ru/), which is actively used in real-world practice of Centers for Public Health and Medical Prevention in 66 constituent entities of the Russian Federation.
- An implementation model for employee wellness programs at the regional level has been developed, based on the Atria digital platform.
Review
For citations:
Kontsevaya A.V., Antsiferova A.A., Ivanova E.S., Drapkina O.M. Atria platform as a tool for implementing employee wellness programs within the National Projects of the Russian Federation. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2024;23(12):4232. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2024-4232. EDN: RWGUQL
Views:
291
Email this article 
