COVID-19 incidence after vaccination with different types of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2
https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2024-4286
EDN: JVSBSJ
Abstract
Until now, there remains a certain interest in studying the role of booster vaccination in the formation of post-vaccination immunity against the Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The variety of vaccine platforms provides the opportunity to choose them for the population and healthcare workers, and also allows taking into account the individual characteristics of each patient.
Aim. To estimate the incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a result of using one type of vaccine and heterologous vaccines during primary and repeated vaccination against the SARSCoV2 based on prospective follow-up data.
Materialandmethods. The study was conducted within the prospective SATURN registry, which included individuals who received various subjects had acute respiratory viral infection. Within six months after the introduction of the full revaccination regimen (after visit 4), coronavirus infection was detected in one participant from group I and one participant from group III. During the subsequent follow-up period, 14 people had SARS-CoV-2 infection as follows: group I — 5, group II — 4, group III — 5 people (p>0,05). Correlation analysis revealed that parameters of cellular and humoral immunity in all three groups of vaccinated individuals revealed the relationship between the level of anti- SARS-CoV-2 S-glycopeptide IgG and the number of active T cells responding to stimulation with surface and nuclear antigens were without significant differences.
Conclusion. It is worth noting that the use of a homologous regimen vaccination and revaccination regimens against the SARS-CoV-2 (Gam- COVID-Vac at both stages) and a heterologous regimen (Gam- virus (homo- and heterologous regimens) based on a combination of two vaccines: Gam- COVID-Vac and CoviVac. Depending on the chosen regimen, 3 following groups were formed: group I (n=106) — participants with a homologous regimen (Gam- COVID-Vac) at each stage of vaccination and revaccination; Group II (n=54) — participants with a heterologous regimen of sequential administration of Gam- COVID-Vac and CoviVac at the vaccination and revaccination stage; Group III (n=40) — particiants with a homologous regimen (CoviVac) at the vaccination and revaccination stage. At the first visit, all participants underwent medical history collection, examination, and identification of potential contraindications to vaccination. At each subsequent visit, the level ofanti- SARS-CoV-2 S-glycoprotein immunoglobulin (Ig) G was additionally determined. At visits 1, 3, and 5, the activity of specifically sensitized T-lymphocytes to the surface and nuclear antigen of SARSCoV-2 was assessed. IgG concentration was determined using the Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG reagent kit, while T-cell immunity was assessed using the T Spot.COVID test system (Oxford Immunotec). Visit 1 corresponded to stage 1 of primary vaccination; visit 2 — stage 2 of primary vaccination; visit 3 (12 months after visit 1) — stage 1 of revaccination; visit 4 (21 days after visit 3) — stage 2 of revaccination; visit 5 — 18 months after primary vaccination; visit 6 — 24 months after primary vaccination.
Results. The study included 200 vaccinated participants with a mean age of 46,5±13,9 years, including 99 (49,5%) men, 101 (50,5%) COVID Vac and CoviVac) demonstrated effectiveness in relation to resistance to coronavirus infection and the formation of a relatively stable level of both humoral and cellular immunity for 18 and 24 months after primary vaccination and subsequent revaccination.
Keywords
About the Authors
O. M. DrapkinaRussian Federation
Moscow
S. A. Berns
Russian Federation
Moscow
M. G. Chashсhin
Russian Federation
Moscow
A. Yu. Gorshkov
Russian Federation
Moscow
O. V. Zhdanova
Russian Federation
Moscow
L. N. Ryzhakova
Russian Federation
Moscow
O. A. Litinskaya
Russian Federation
Moscow
M. S. Pokrovskaya
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Isiutina-Fedotkova TS, Zhernov YV, Makarova VV, et al. Hygienic aspects of anti COVID-19 measures. Health Risk Analysis. 2023;8:171-83. (In Russ.). doi:10.21668/health.risk/2023.1.16.
2. Yermalovich MA, Kolodkina VL, Samoilovich EO, et al. Postinfectious and Postvaccinal Humoral Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 in Adults: Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2023;22(3):50-6. (In Russ.) doi:10.31631/2073-3046-2023-22-3-50-56.
3. Barouch DH. Covid-19 Vaccines — Immunity, Variants, Boosters. N Engl J Med. 2022;387:1011-20. doi:10.1056/nejmra2206573.
4. Logunov DY, Dolzhikova IV, Shcheblyakov DV, et al. Gam-COVIDVac Vaccine Trial Group. Safety and efficacy of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine: an interim analysis of a randomised controlled phase 3 trial in Russia. Lancet. 2021;397(10275):671-81. doi:10.1016/S01406736(21)00234-8. Erratum in: Lancet. 2021;397(10275):670.
5. Krammer F. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development. Nature. 2020; 586(7830):516-27. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2798-3.
6. Logunov DY, Dolzhikova IV, Zubkova OV, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine in two formulations: two open, non-randomised phase 1/2 studies from Russia. Lancet. 2020; 396(10255):887-97. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31866-3.
7. König M, Torgauten HM, Tran TT, et al. Immunogenicity and Safety of a Third SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Dose in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Weak Immune Response after COVID-19 Vaccination. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79:307-9. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.5109.
8. Drapkina OM, Berns SA, Gorshkov AYu, et al. Comparative assessment of the immunogenicity of various revaccination regimens against the SARS-CoV-2. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2022;21(12):3483. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2022-3483. EDN XMCZAE.
9. Drapkina OM, Berns SA, Gorshkov AYu, et al. Booster vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: current challenges and solutions. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2022;11(2):196-203. (In Russ.) doi:10.17802/2306-1278-2022-11-2-196-203.
10. Abdelmoneim SA, Sallam M, Hafez DM, et al. COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Dose Acceptance: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022;7:46-71. doi:10.3390/tropicalmed7100298.
11. Kudlay D, Svistunov A, Satyshev O. COVID-19 Vaccines: An Updated Overview of Different Platforms. Bioengineering. 2022;9:1-17. doi:10.3390/bioengineering9110714.
12. Drapkina OM, Chashchin MG, Berns SA, et al. Analysis of the humoral and cell-mediated immune response in heterologous and homologous SARS-CoV-2 revaccination. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2023;22(10):3764. (In Russ.) Драпкина О. М., doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2023-3764. EDN RMYFDH.
13. Díaz-Dinamarca DA, Díaz P, Barra G, et al. Humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 evoked by heterologous vaccination groups using the CoronaVac (Sinovac) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) vaccines in Chile. Front Public Heal. 2023;11. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1229045.
Supplementary files
What is already known about the subject?
- Primary vaccination and revaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) make it possible to form complex immediate and mid-term periods.
- The use of different types of vaccines during subsequent revaccination can contribute to more stable complex immunity.
What might this study add?
- The use of homologous and heterologous revaccination regimens against COVID-19 is effective in preventing COVID-19 and contributes to stable level of both humoral and cellular immunity for 24 months.
Review
For citations:
Drapkina O.M., Berns S.A., Chashсhin M.G., Gorshkov A.Yu., Zhdanova O.V., Ryzhakova L.N., Litinskaya O.A., Pokrovskaya M.S. COVID-19 incidence after vaccination with different types of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2024;23(12):4286. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2024-4286. EDN: JVSBSJ