Creation of a fecal microbiota bank network in the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2025-4621
EDN: SGOTRS
Abstract
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective and safe treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections. It is increasingly used to treat diseases pathogenetically associated with intestinal dysbiosis. Only 10% of the global demand for this treatment method is met. The growing popularity of this method necessitates the creation of fecal microbiota banks (FMBs), as they provide access to carefully screened fecal suspensions obtained from healthy donors. This review article analyzes approaches to FMB development, taking into account the legislative framework of the Russian Federation (RF), compared with regulations in North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region. Four following regulatory strategies for FMT are considered, defining the prospects for biobanking: 1) medicinal product; 2) biological product; 3) substance of human origin; 4) medical practice. Introducing the approach practiced in the People's Republic of China (FMT as a medical practice) and the European Union (FMT as the use of a substance of human origin) in the Russian Federation is substantiated. The development of a FMB network will be facilitated by the national implementation of a standardized technology for collecting, processing donor material, storing, and dispensing the FMT product. Regional FMBs can be deployed at medical and research institutions, as well as at industrial pharmacies. Clinical and laboratory profiling of donors and recipients, including metagenomic analysis, in a national database will enable the creation of a system to support medical decision-making and improve the efficacy and safety of FMT for the treatment of a wide range of pathologies. Developing a national FMB system will require coordinated efforts between specialized public organizations (with National Association of Biobanks and Biobanking Specialists (NASBIO)) and federal executive bodies, among which the Federal Medical and Biological Agency has the most experience with FMT and the necessary regulatory framework. A compelling advantage of deploying a national FMB network in Russia is the wide regional microbiome diversity, which allows for the identification of "superdonors" in conjunction with personalized FMT. The preconditions for accelerated advancement in the field of metagenomic regulation of human health have been created, and the FMB network is one of the tools for implementing this national breakthrough technology.
About the Author
K. A. ApartsinRussian Federation
96/353, Sovetskaya Street, Irkutsk, 664047
References
1. Ke S, Weiss ST, Liu YY. Rejuvenating the human gut microbiome. Trends Mol Med. 2022;28(8):619-30. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2022.05.005.
2. Chuong KH, Hwang DM, Tullis DE, et al. Navigating social and ethical challenges of biobanking for human microbiome research. BMC Med Ethics. 2017;18(1):1. doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0160-y.
3. Lu G, Wang W, Li P, et al. Washed preparation of faecal microbiota changes the transplantation related safety, quantitative method and delivery. Microb Biotechnol. 2022;15(9):2439-49. doi:10.1111/1751-7915.14074.
4. Dominguez-Bello MG, Steiger D, Fankhauser M, et al. The microbiota vault initiative: safeguarding Earth’s microbial heritage for future generations. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):5373. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61008-5.
5. Kopylova OV, Ershova AI, Borisova AL, et al. Specifics of creating clinical abstract of biospecimens. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2023;22(11):3855. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2023-3855.
6. Lin A, Jiang A, Huang L, et al. From chaos to order: optimizing fecal microbiota transplantation for enhanced immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacy. Gut Microbes. 2025;17(1):2452277. doi:10.1080/19490976.2025.2452277.
7. Mullish BH, Merrick B, Quraishi MN, et al. The use of faecal microbiota transplant as treatment for recurrent or refractory Clostridioides difficile infection and other potential indications: second edition of joint British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS) guidelines. Gut. 2024;73(7):1052-75. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331550.
8. Kelly BJ, Tebas P. Clinical Practice and Infrastructure Review of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Clostridium difficile Infection. Chest. 2018;153(1):266-77. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2017.09.002.
9. Peery AF, Kelly CR, Kao D, et al. AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on Fecal Microbiota-Based Therapies for Select Gastrointestinal Diseases. Gastroenterology. 2024;166(3):409-34. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2024.01.008.
10. Vasant DH, Bhatt A, Fardiweh M, et al. Safety and Efficacy of FMT as a Modern Adjuvant Therapy in Various Diseases and Disorders: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Front Immunol. 2024;15: 1439176. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1439176.
11. Gilja OH, Goll R, Christiansen IK, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation in Norwegian outpatients: a prospective observational study. BMJ Open. 2023;13(12):e073275. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073275.
12. Apartsin K, Smirnova V. Convalescent fecal microbiota transplantation as a possible treatment for COVID-19. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2020;44(5):e113-4. doi:10.1016/j.clinre.2020.08.003.
13. Groenewegen B, van Lingen E, Ooijevaar RE, et al. How to prepare stool banks for an appropriate response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences in the Netherlands and a retrospective comparative cohort study for faecal microbiota transplantation. PLoS One. 2022;17(3):e0265426. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0265426.
14. Wang Y, Zhang S, Borody TJ, et al. Encyclopedia of fecal microbiota transplantation: a review of effectiveness in the treatment of 85 diseases. Chin Med J (Engl). 2022;135(16):1927-39. doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000002339.
15. Rondinella D, Quaranta G, Rozera T, et al. Donor screening for fecal microbiota transplantation with a direct stool testing-based strategy: a prospective cohort study. Microbes Infect. 2024; 26(5-6):105341. doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2024.105341.
16. Prati D, Caprioli F, Stea L, et al. A "movement" worth making: why and how transfusion services can play a role in fecal microbiota transplant programs. Blood Transfus. 2025;23(3):275-82. doi:10.2450/BloodTransfus.929.
17. Chen J, Zaman A, Ramakrishna B, et al. Stool Banking for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Methods and Operations at a Large Stool Bank. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:622949. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.622949.
18. Cammarota G, Ianiro G, Kelly CR, et al. International consensus conference on stool banking for faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice. Gut. 2019;68(12):2111-21. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319548.
19. Ng SC, Kamm MA, Yeoh YK, et al. Scientific frontiers in faecal microbiota transplantation: joint document of Asia-Pacific Association of Gastroenterology (APAGE) and Asia-Pacific Society for Digestive Endoscopy (APSDE). Gut. 2020;69(1):83-91. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319407.
20. Haifer C, Kelly CR, Paramsothy S, et al. Australian consensus statements for the regulation, production and use of faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice. Gut. 2020;69(5): 801-10. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320260.
21. Mullish BH, Merrick B, Quraishi MN, et al. The use of faecal microbiota transplant as treatment for recurrent or refractory Clostridioides difficile infection and other potential indications: second edition of joint British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS) guidelines. J Hosp Infect. 2024;148:189-219. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2024.03.001.
22. Gweon TG, Lee YJ, Kim KO, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Korea. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022;28(1):28-42. doi:10.5056/jnm21221.
23. Gospodaryk AV, Prokhorova ND, Bespyatykh JA. Selection of donors for fecal microbiota transplantation: compulsory public health screening. ORGZDRAV: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie. Vestnik VSHOUZ. [HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT: News, Views, Education. Bulletin of VSHOUZ]. 2024;10(1):92-103. (In Russ.) doi:10.33029/2411-8621-2024-10-1-92-103.
24. Drapkina OM, Vlasov VV, Morozov VV, et al. Treatment of Human Diseases Using Enema Administration of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Methodological Recommendations. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2024;27(6):79-87. (In Russ.) doi:10.17116/profmed20242706179.
25. Scheeler A. Where Stool is a Drug: International Approaches to Regulating the Use of Fecal Microbiota for Transplantation. J Law Med Ethics. 2019;47(4):524-40. doi:10.1177/1073110519897729.
26. Ishikawa D, Zhang X, Nagahara A. Current Applications and Future Prospects of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation. Juntendo Med J. 2025;71(2):68-75. doi:10.14789/ejmj.JMJ24-0045-R.
27. Jørgensen SMD, Hvas CL, Dahlerup JF, et al. Banking feces: a new frontier for public blood banks? Transfusion. 2019;59(9): 2776-82. doi:10.1111/trf.15422.
28. Claassen-Weitz S, du Toit E, Gardner-Lubbe S, et al. Knowledge and Perceptions of South African Blood Donors Towards Biobanking and Stool Donation. S Afr J Infect Dis. 2024;39(1):645. doi:10.4102/sajid.v39i1.645.
29. Kragsnaes MS, Nilsson AC, Kjeldsen J, et al. How do I establish a stool bank for fecal microbiota transplantation within the blood- and tissue transplant service? Transfusion. 2020;60(6):1135-41. doi:10.1111/trf.15816.
30. Baydoun H, Hussain N, Wu KO, et al. What's New and What's Next in Fecal Microbiota Transplantation? Biologics. 2025;19:481-96. doi:10.2147/BTT.S486372.
31. Vlasov VV, Morozov VV. Russian experience in fecal microbiota transplantation. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2023;(4):113-20. (In Russ.) doi:10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-212-4-113-120.
32. Alekhin AV, Erivantseva TN, Ryazhenov VV, et al. New role of extemporaneous manufacturing in regulating drug products access onto the market. Pharmacy & Pharmacology. 2023;11(2):161-72. (In Russ.) doi:10.19163/2307-9266-2023-11-2-161-172.
33. Orlova NV, Il'enko LI. Extemporaneous Production of Medicinal Products — Advantages and Perspectives. Medical Alphabet. 2023;(13):7-10. (In Russ.) Орлова Н. В., Ильенко Л. И. Экстемпоральное производство лекарственных препаратов — преимущества и перспективы. Медицинский алфавит. 2023;(13):7-10. doi:10.33667/2078-5631-2023-13-7-10.
34. Camilleri M, Ford AC, Powell N, et al. The first international Rome consensus on functional bowel disorders (FBD) and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). Gut. 2024;73(4):635-45. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329948.
35. Liu Y, Li X, Chen Y, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation: application scenarios, efficacy prediction, and factors impacting donor-recipient interplay. Front Microbiol. 2025;16:1556827. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1556827.
36. Kazerouni A, Burgess J, Burns LJ, et al. Optimal Screening and Donor Management in a Public Stool Bank. Microbiome. 2015;3:75. doi:10.1186/s40168-015-0140-3.
37. Zhang T, Lu G, Zhao Z, et al. Washed microbiota transplantation vs. manual fecal microbiota transplantation: clinical findings, animal studies and in vitro screening. Protein Cell. 2020;11(4):251-66. doi:10.1007/s13238-019-00684-8.
38. Kopylova OV, Ershova AI, Pokrovskaya MS, et al. Biobanking in the hospital of a multidisciplinary research medical center as a potential for a wide research range. Part II. Specifics and first results of developing a described collection of biomaterial. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2023;22(11):3799. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2023-3799. EDN: VFFYDN.
39. Prokhorova ND, Gospodaryk AV, Bespyatykh JA. Gut microbiota: role in human health and potential for personalized medicine. Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2024; 13(4):81-8. (In Russ.) doi:10.17116/dokgastro20241304181.
40. Pokrovskaya MS, Borisova AL, Kiseleva AV, et al. Role of biobanking in the development of personalized medicine in Russia and the world. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2024;23(11):4214. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2024-4214.
Supplementary files
What is already known about the subject?
- Fecal microbiota transplantation is an effective and safe treatment for diseases associated with intestinal dysbiosis. A therapeutic fecal microbiota bank (FMB) is essential for the implementation of this technology.
What might this study add?
- The literature review provides a rationale for creating a national FMB network, taking into account global and Russian regulatory practices, existing healthcare resources, and the participation of specialized public organizations. The wide regional microbiome diversity allows for the identification of "superdonors" and the implementation of personalized FMB transplantation based on clinical decision support. The implementation of the FMB network increases the potential for metagenomic regulation of human health in the Russian Federation.
Review
For citations:
Apartsin K.A. Creation of a fecal microbiota bank network in the Russian Federation. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2025;24(11):4621. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2025-4621. EDN: SGOTRS
JATS XML

















































