Preview

Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention

Advanced search

Left ventricular ejection fraction changes after an episode of decompensated acute heart failure: a three-year follow-up

https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2026-4764

EDN: CQGLYZ

Abstract

Aim. To study the incidence and clinical prognostic significance of changes in heart failure (HF) phenotype based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) changes over 3 years.

Material and methods. This retrospective study included 157 patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). The results of baseline echocardiography and repeat examinations at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were assessed. Patients were divided into subgroups based on baseline LVEF as follows: HF with reduced LVEF (HFrEF) (<40%), HF with mildly reduced LVEF (HFmrEF) (40-49%), and HF with preserved LVEF (HFpEF) (≥50%).

Results. Among patients with baseline HFrEF, transition to the HFpEF subgroup was observed in 14%, and transition to the HFmrEF in 20%, while an increase in LVEF >10% was noted in 31% of patients. In the HFmrEF subgroup, LVEF normalized in 48% of patients, and decreased to <40% in 22%. In the HFpEF subgroup, a decrease in LVEF <40% was recorded in 10% of cases. According to the Cox model, the transition from the HFrEF subgroup to the HF with improved EF subgroup was associated with higher overall survival (HR (hazard ratio) 4,57; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1,039-20,177; p=0,04). The risk of cardiovascular death in patients who transitioned from the HFrEF subgroup to any other subgroup (HFmrEF, HFpEF) was also associated with improved survival (HR 8,852; 95% CI: 1,139-68,805, p=0,04). In the HFpEF subgroup, a decrease in LVEF <40% was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR 4,906; 95% CI: 1,08622,153; p=0,039).

Conclusion. Clinically significant improvement in cardiac function is observed in almost half of patients with a baseline reduced LVEF and is associated with a better prognosis. A decrease in LVEF in the HFpEF subgroup is a predictor of unfavorable outcome.

About the Authors

S. A. Panov
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University; S.S. Yudin City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Trubetskaya str., 8, bld. 2, Moscow, 119048; Kolomensky Proyezd, 4, Moscow, 115446



K. V. Charaya
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation

Trubetskaya str., 8, bld. 2, Moscow, 119048



T. N. Erdniev
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation

Trubetskaya str., 8, bld. 2, Moscow, 119048



N. A. Gogiberidze
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation

Trubetskaya str., 8, bld. 2, Moscow, 119048



S. A. Sovetova
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University; S.S. Yudin City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Trubetskaya str., 8, bld. 2, Moscow, 119048; Kolomensky Proyezd, 4, Moscow, 115446



A. A. Bogdanova
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation

Trubetskaya str., 8, bld. 2, Moscow, 119048



D. Yu. Shchekochikhin
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University; Pirogov City Clinical Hospital № 1
Russian Federation

Trubetskaya str., 8, bld. 2, Moscow, 119048; Leninsky Prospekt, 8, Moscow, 119049



D. A. Andreev
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation

Trubetskaya str., 8, bld. 2, Moscow, 119048



References

1. Galyavich AS, Tereshchenko SN, Uskach TM, et al. 2024 Clinical practice guidelines for Chronic heart failure. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024;29(11):6162. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2024-6162.

2. Panov S, Charaya K, Sovetova S, et al. Prognostic Value of Early Rehospitalization in Heart Failure Patients. J Clin Med. 2025;14(21):7720. doi:10.3390/jcm14217720.

3. Matskeplishvili ST, Saidova MA, Mironenko MYu, et al. Standard transthoracic echocardiography. Guidelines 2024. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2025;30(2):6271. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-40712025-6271.

4. Ding Z, Si J, Zhang X, et al. Prognostic implications of left ventricular ejection fraction trajectory changes in heart failure. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1232404. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1232404.

5. Gu J, Yin ZF, Zhang HL, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of transitions among heart failure categories: a prospective observational cohort study. ESC Heart Fail. 2020;7(2):616-25. doi:10.1002/ehf2.12619.

6. Writing Committee Members; ACC/AHA Joint Committee Members. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure. J Card Fail. 2022;28(5):e1-167. doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.02.010.

7. Nakamaru R, Shiraishi Y, Kohno T, et al. Treatment patterns and trajectories in patients after acute heart failure hospitalization. ESC Heart Fail. 2024;11(2):692-701. doi:10.1002/ehf2.14635.

8. Sovetova S, Charaya K, Erdniev T, et al. Venous Excess Ultrasound Score Is Associated with Worsening Renal Function and Reduced Natriuretic Response in Patients with Acute Heart Failure. J Clin Med. 2024;13(20):6272. doi:10.3390/jcm13206272.

9. Charaya K, Shchekochikhin D, Andreev D, et al. Impact of dapagliflozin treatment on renal function and diuretics use in acute heart failure: a pilot study. Open Heart. 2022;9:e001936. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2021-001936.

10. Breathett K, Allen LA, Udelson J, et al. Changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Predict Survival and Hospitalization in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. Circ Heart Fail. 2016; 9(10):e002962. doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002962.

11. Vasan RS, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, et al. Congestive heart failure in subjects with normal versus reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: prevalence and mortality in a population-based cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33(7):1948-55. doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00118-7.

12. Devereux RB, Roman MJ, Liu JE, et al. Congestive heart failure despite normal left ventricular systolic function in a populationbased sample: the Strong Heart Study. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86(10):1090-6. doi:10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01165-6.

13. Kitzman DW, Gardin JM, Gottdiener JS, et al. Importance of heart failure with preserved systolic function in patients > or = 65 years of age. CHS Research Group. Cardiovascular Health Study. Cardiovascular Health Study. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87(4):413-9. doi:10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01393-x.

14. Koziolova NA, Mironova SV, Ulybina EV. Acute decompensated heart failure in patients with prediabetes: relationship with risk factors and comorbidities. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2023;28(3):5373. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-20235373.

15. Wybraniec MT, Orszulak M, Męcka K, et al. Heart Failure with Improved Ejection Fraction: Insight into the Variable Nature of Left Ventricular Systolic Function. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(21):14400. doi:10.3390/ijerph192114400.

16. Cao TH, Tay WT, Jones DJL, et al. Heart failure with improved versus persistently reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: A comparison of the BIOSTAT-CHF (European) study with the ASIAN-HF registry. Eur J Heart Fail. 2024;26(12):2518-28. doi:10.1002/ejhf.3378.

17. Larina VN, Zamyatin KA, Sheregova EN, et al. Adherence to treatment as an integral component of the management of patients with heart failure. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024;29(1):5690. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2024-5690.

18. Jarrah M, Khader Y, Alkouri O, et al. Medication Adherence and Its Influencing Factors among Patients with Heart Failure: A Cross Sectional Study. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023;59(5):960. doi:10.3390/medicina59050960.

19. Zhang X, Sun Y, Zhang Y, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of heart failure with recovered left ventricular ejection fraction. ESC Heart Fail. 2021;8:5383-91. doi:10.1002/ehf2.13630.

20. Sun Y, Chen X, Zhang Y, et al. Reverse atrial remodeling in heart failure with recovered ejection fraction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12:e026891. doi:10.1161/JAHA.122.026891.

21. Kalogeropoulos AP, Fonarow GC, Georgiopoulou V, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of adult outpatients with heart failure and improved or recovered ejection fraction. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1:510-8. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2016.1325.


What is already known about the subject?

  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) asses­sment using echocardiography is the most common and accessible method for assessing LV contractility and forms the basis for classifying patients with heart failure (HF).
  • Over time, with optimal pharmacotherapy or a re­cur­rent cardiovascular event, myocardial con­trac­ti­lity can either improve or worsen, reflecting LVEF changes.

What might this study add?

  • Some patients with HF experience an increase or even normalization of LVEF after a baseline de­crea­se. A small proportion of patients with HF and ini­tially preserved LVEF experience a decrease du­ring 3-year follow-up.
  • Changes in LVEF during long-term follow-up are an important and accessible marker of prognosis in HF.

Review

For citations:


Panov S.A., Charaya K.V., Erdniev T.N., Gogiberidze N.A., Sovetova S.A., Bogdanova A.A., Shchekochikhin D.Yu., Andreev D.A. Left ventricular ejection fraction changes after an episode of decompensated acute heart failure: a three-year follow-up. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2026;25(4):4764. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2026-4764. EDN: CQGLYZ

Views: 214

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1728-8800 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0125 (Online)