Preview

Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention

Advanced search

SMOKING STATUS AND EFFECTIVENESS OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE VASODILATING

https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2013-1-25-31

Abstract

Aim. To compare antihypertensive effectiveness of carvedilol, nebivolol, and amlodipine in smokers and non-smokers with arterial hypertension (AH).

Material and methods. The study included 130 patients with Stage 1–2 AH, aged 30–55 years, who were randomised into three treatment groups: carvedilol (n=56), nebivolol (n=44), and amlodipine (n=30). Each group was also divided into two subgroups of smokers and non￾smokers (never-smokers or ex-smokers who stopped smoking at least one year ago). At baseline and after 8 weeks of the treatment, the dynamics of office blood pressure (BP) levels, parameters of 24-hour BP monitoring, and lung function were compared across the subgroups.

Results. After 8 weeks of the treatment, office BP levels reduced significantly and comparably in all subgroups. According to the results of 24-hour BP monitoring, smokers from the carvedilol group did not demonstrate any marked BP dynamics, in contrast to their non-smoking peers. Smokers treated with nebivolol demonstrated no reduction in mean 24-hour levels of systolic BP (SBP), with some reduction in mean 24-hour and mean daytime levels of diastolic BP (DBP), as well as a decrease in SBP and DBP variability. Amlodipine effectively reduced mean 24-hour BP levels in both smokers (by 10,0/8,0 mm Hg) and non-smokers (by 11,3/6,5 mm Hg), with similar dynamics of mean daytime SBP and DBP and mean nighttime SBP. Lung function parameters in smokers receiving amlodipine did not change, while the β-adrenoblocker treatment negatively affected these parameters in smokers. In the carvedilol group, smokers demonstrated a significant reduction in FEV1; in the nebivolol group, FEV1, FLC, and their ratio significantly decreased in smokers.

Conclusion. In young and middle-aged smokers with AH, antihypertensive effects, as assessed with the 24-hour BP monitoring, were weaker for carvedilol (SBP and DBP) and nebivolol (DBP). Amlodipine was highly effective in both smokers and non-smokers. Therefore, amlodipine could be recommended as one of the first-choice medications for smoking patients with AH. 

About the Authors

O. V. Fedorishina
Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Post-diploma Education, Irkutsk
Russian Federation


K. V. Protasov
Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Post-diploma Education, Irkutsk
Russian Federation


A. A. Dzizinskyi
Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Post-diploma Education, Irkutsk
Russian Federation


References

1. Oganov RG, Timofeeva TN, Koltunov IE, et al. Epidemiology of arterial hypertension in Russia. The results of federal monitoring 2003– 2010. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention 2011;1:9–13. Russian (Оганов Р.Г., Тимофеева Т.Н., Колтунов И.Е. и др. Эпидемиология артериальной гипертонии в России. Результаты федерального мониторинга 2003–2010 гг. Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика 2011; 1: 9–13).

2. Bang LE, Buttenschon L, Kristensen KS, et al. Do we undertreat hypertensive smokers? A comparison between smoking and nonsmoking hypertensives. Circulation 1994; 90 (1): 248–53.

3. Journath G, Nilsson PM, Petersson U, et al. Hypertensive smokers have a worse cardiovascular risk profile than non–smokers in spite of treatment — a national study in Sweden. Blood Press 2005; 14 (3): 144–50.

4. Martsevich SYu, Shalnova SA, Deev AD, et al. PROLOG study: main results and guidance for further action. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention 2006; 6:23–6. Russian (Марцевич С.Ю., Шальнова С.А., Деев А.Д. и др. Исследование ПРОЛОГ: основные итоги и руководство к действию. Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика 2006;6:23–6).

5. Nebieridze DV, Meliya A, Kulieva GR. Beta-adrenoblockers in clinical practice: is there any difference? Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention 2007; 3:90–3. Russian (Небиеридзе Д.В., Мелия А., Кулиева Г.Р. Бета– адреноблокаторы в клинической практике: все ли они одинаковые? Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика 2007; 3:90–3).

6. Preobrazhensky DV, Sidorenko VA, Dedova IS, et al. β-Adrenoreceptor Blockers in the Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases: The Place of Carvedilol. Kardiologiia 2006; 12:79–88. Russian (Преображенский Д.В., Сидоренко Б.А., Дедова И.С. и др. Блокаторы β-адренорецепторов в лечении сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний: место карведилола. Кардиология 2006; 12: 79–88).

7. Chazova IE, Ratova LG, Boitsov SA, Nebieridze DV. Diagnosis and treatment of arterial hypertension. Russian recommendations (the 4th rev.). System Hypertension 2010; 3:5–26. Russian (Чазова И.Е., Ратова Л.Г., Бойцов С.А., Небиеридзе Д.В. Диагностика и лечение артериальной гипертензии. Российские рекомендации (четвертый пересмотр). Системные гипертензии 2010; 3: 5–26).

8. Chuchalin AG. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: The Federal Program: Pract. Guideline for Physicians. Moscow: 2004. 61 p. Russian (Чучалин А. Г. Хроническая обструктивная болезнь легких: Федеральная программа: практ. рук. для врачей. М.: 2004. 61 с).

9. Vyssoulis GP, Marinakis AG, Aznaouridis KA, et al. The influence of antihypertensive therapy with the third generation of beta-blockers on endothelial function and prothrombotic status. The effects of smoking. Rus J Cardiol 2011; 2: 86–93. Russian (Виссулис Г.П., Маринакис А.Г., Азнауридис К.А. и др. Влияние антигипертензивной терапии бета- блокаторами третьего поколения на функцию эндотелия и протром-ботический статус. Эффекты курения. Российский кардиологический журнал 2011; 2: 86–93).

10. Zanchetti A. Clinical pharmacodynamics of nebivolol: new evidence of nitric oxide-mediated vasodilating activity and peculiar haemodynamic properties in hypertensive patients. Blood Press 2004; 13 (suppl.1): 17–32.

11. McNeely W, Goa KL. Nebivolol in the treatment of essential hypertension. A review. Drugs 1999; 57 (4):633–51.

12. Hermida RC, Ayala DE, Calvo C, et al. Effects of nebivolol on ambulatory blood pressure in smoker and non-smoker hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens 2005; 18: 62A–3.

13. Ovcharenko SI, Litvinova IV. Is there limitations for administration of β-blockers in patients with IHD and / or essential hypertension and co-existing bronchoobstructive syndrome? Pulmonology 2009; 6:90–100. Russian (Овчаренко С. И., Литвинова И.В. Существует ли проблема применения β-адреноблокаторов у пациентов с ишемической болезнью сердца и/или артериальной гипертонией и сопутствующим бронхообструктивным синдромом? Пульмонология 2009; 6: 90–100).

14. Matsui Y, Kario K, Ishikawa J, et al. Smoking and antihypertensive medication: interaction between blood pressure reduction and arterial stiffness. Hypertens Res 2005; 28 (8): 631–8.

15. Kara-Perz H, Kosicka T, Perz S. Is hypotensive effectiveness of amlodipine therapy in smokers connected with endothelin-1 (ET-1) concentration? Przegl Lek 2007; 64 (10): 703–5.

16. Williams DO, Barnes PJ, Vickers HP, et al. Effect of nifedipine on bronchomotor tone and histamine reactivity in asthma. BMJ 1981; 282: 348.


Review

For citations:


Fedorishina O.V., Protasov K.V., Dzizinskyi A.A. SMOKING STATUS AND EFFECTIVENESS OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE VASODILATING. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2013;12(1):25-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2013-1-25-31

Views: 1125


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1728-8800 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0125 (Online)