Transoesophageal electrocardiography features in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
Abstract
Aim. To study diagnostic value of transoesophageal electrocardiography (TE ECG) in verifying double physiology of atrio-ventricular (AV) node in differential diagnostics of supraventricular tachycardias (SVT), as well as in assessment of diagnostic specifics among patients with paroxysmal AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (PAVNRT).
Material and methods. To diagnose SVT, 391 TE ECG procedures were performed; in 234 patients, PAVNRT diagnosis was confirmed. The present study included 49 PAVNRT patients: 34 (69,4%) women and 15 (30,6%) men; mean age 52,6±24,6 years; mean arrhythmia duration 11,6±8,9 years. TE ECG was performed according to a standard protocol; afterwards, intracardiac (IC) ECG and radioablation (RA) were performed at a Cardiosurgery department. Finally, the protocols of TE and IC ECG were compared.
Results. TE ECG demonstrated some specific features of AV node physiology and higher sensitivity and specificity in PAVNRT diagnostics. However, TE ECG was inadequately effective in verifying double physiology of AV node in PAVNRT patients with “inseparable” AV conduction curve or with wide QRS tachycardia. Moreover, TE ECG potential was limited in differential diagnostics between PAVNRT and orthodrome AV tachycardia with involvement of left posterior additional branch. To identify specific SVT types, AV conductivity character, atrial activation sequence, and VA conductivity time in tachyarrhythmia should be analysed. Since all these criteria have low specificity, they should be considered in combination only.
Conclusion. IC ECG remains the “gold standard” in diagnosing electrophysiological mechanisms of paroxysmal tachycardias. However, TE ECG data ply an important role in PAVNRT diagnostics. Specificity of the latter method influences indications and contraindications for intervention, as well as affects RA complication prognosis.
About the Authors
A. V. TarasovRussian Federation
Zhukovsky City Clinical Hospital
K. V. Davtyan
Russian Federation
Moscow
Yu. M. Pozdnyakov
Russian Federation
Zhukovsky City Clinical Hospital
References
1. Josephson ME. Clinical cardiac electrophysiology: techniques and interpretations. – 3th ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott & Williams 2002; 857.
2. Lockwood D, Otomo K, Wang Z, et al. Electrophysiologic characteristics of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: implications for the reentrant circuits // Cardiac electrophysiology: from cell to bedside/ D.P. Zipes, J. Jalife, eds. – 4th ed. Philadelphia, WB Saunders 2004; 537-57.
3. Akhtar M, Jazayeri M, Blank S. Electrophysiologic stady of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 1993; 74: 1234-40.
4. Elvas L, Gursoy S, Andries E. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Can J Cardiol 1994; 10: 342-8.
5. Jazayeri M, Sra J, Akhtar M. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Electrophysiologic characteristics, therapeutic interventions, and specific reference to anatomic boundary of the reentrant circuit. Cardiol Clin 1993; 11: 151-81.
6. Татарский Б. А., Чирейкин Л.В. Особенности антероградного атриовентрикулярного проведения возбуждения у больных с пароксизмальными реципрокными атриовентрикулярными узловыми тахикардиями (часть I). Вест аритмол 1999; 13: 20-6.
7. Медведев М.М. Диагностика пароксизмальной реципрокной атриовентрикулярной узловой тахикардии. Вест аритмол 2004; 33: 66-80.
8. Сулимов В.А. ЧПЭС сердца у больных с наджелудочковыми пароксизмальными тахикардиями. Чреспищеводная электрическая стимуляция сердца / под редакцией Сулимова В.А., Маколкина В.И. Москва “Медицина” 2001; 83-144.
9. Шубик Ю.В. Неинвазивное электрофизиологическое исследование при аномалиях проводящей системы сердца (атлас). Санкт-Петербург, ИНКАРТ 1999; 4-7.
10. Denes P, Wu D, Dhingra RC, et al. Demonstration of dual A-V nodal pathways in patients wich paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation 1973; 48: 549-55.
11. Goldreyer BN, Damato AN. The essential role of atrioventricular conduction delay in the initiation of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation 1971; 43: 679-87.
12. Moulton KP, Wang X, Xu Y, et al. High incidence of dual A-V nodal pathway physiology in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation of accessory pathways (abstract). Circulation 1990; 82: 319.
13. Тарасов А.В., Бурба С.В., Давтян К.В. Методика выполнения ЧП ЭФИ. Чреспищеводное электрофизиологическое исследование / под редакцией Позднякова Ю.М. Москва, ФГУП “ВИНИТИ” 2006; 13-27.
14. Оферкин А.И., Петш А.И., Мамчур С.Е. Радиочастотная аблация атриовентрикулярной узловой тахикардии. Томск, Издательство СибГМУ 2006; 42 c.
Review
For citations:
Tarasov A.V., Davtyan K.V., Pozdnyakov Yu.M. Transoesophageal electrocardiography features in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2009;8(7):84-90. (In Russ.)