Clinical value of complex ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure and arterial rigidity in elderly patients
Abstract
Aim. To study the clinical and diagnostic role of pulse wave time (PWT) in 24-hour blood pressure monitoring (BPM) and its link to elasticity of larger arteries and aorta (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, PWVcf; cardioankle vascular index, CAVI) in patients aged over 75 years.
Material and methods. The study included 52 patients (20 men) aged over 75 years (mean age 79,1±3,5 years) with arterial hypertension (AH). Fifteen participants had cardiovascular events (CVE) in anamnesis: myocardial infarction, MI (n=11) or stroke (n=4). Sixteen patients had Functional Class II-III angina (n=16), and 32 received antihypertensive therapy. 24-hour BMP and PWT parameters were measured. Corrected PWT100-60 was calculated for systolic BP (SBP) 100 mm Hg and heart rate (HR) 60 bpm. PWVcf and CAVI were assessed with a screening device VS 1000 VaSera, Fukuda Denshi, Japan.
Results. In all participants, clinical BP level was 147,5+6,9/76,5+5,1 mm Hg; 24-hour BPM BP level - 139,6+6,7/70,7+4,6 mm Hg; PWT100-60 - 161,7+6,2 ms; PWVcf - 17,3+4,6 m/s, and CAVI - 10,6+3,1. A significant negative correlation between PWT100-60 and 24-hour BPM SBP (r=-0,36, p<0,05), 24-hour BPM PBP (r=-0,43, p<0,01), PWVcf (r=-0,54, p<0,01) and CAVI (r=-0,34, p<0,05) was observed. Patients with and without CVE were comparable by age. CVE-free participants were characterised by lower frequency of antihypertensive therapy, higher levels of clinical BP (153,5+6,9/82,5+6,3 vs. 136,5+3,4/71,1+3,9 mm Hg), higher 24-hour BPM BP (144,0+6,9/73,2+5,3 vs. 132,6+4,2/69,3+3,8 mm Hg), lower PVWcf (15,8+4 vs. 18,7+4,4 m/s), lower CAVI (9,7+2,4 vs. 11,5+3,8), and higher PWT100-60 (167+5,4 vs. 156,2+6,9 ms; p<0,05).
Conclusion. In AH patients aged over 75 years, PWT100-60 correlated with traditional indices of arterial rigidity. Lower PWT100-60 and higher PWV were observed among individuals with CVE in anamnesis.
About the Authors
M. A. MarkovaRussian Federation
Moscow
E. E. Tyulkina
Russian Federation
Moscow
Yu. V. Kotovskaya
Russian Federation
Moscow
Zh. D. Kobalava
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Safar ME, Laurent S, London GM: The arterial system in essential hypertension, in Safar ME, (ed), Clinical Research in Hypertension. Schattauer, Stuttgart — New York 1989; 115-32.
2. Darne B, Girerd X, Safar M, et al. Pulsatile versus steady component of blood pressure: a cross sectional analysis and a prospective analysis on cardiovascular mortality. Hypertension 1989; 13: 392-400.
3. Madhavan S, Ooi WL, Cohen H, Alderman M. Relation of pulse pressure and blood pressure reduction to the incidence of myocardial infarction. Hypertension 1994; 23: 395-401.
4. Gosse P, Gasparoux P, Ansoborlo P, et al. Prognostic value of ambula¬tory measurement of the timing of Korotkoff sounds in elderly hypertensive: a pilot study. Am J Hypertens 1997; 10: 552-7.
5. Blacher J, Asmar R, Djane S, et al. Aortic pulse wave velocity as a marker of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients. Hypertension 1999; 33: 1111-7.
6. Meaume S, Rudnichi A, Lynch A, et al. Aortic pulse wave velocity: an independent marker of cardiovascular risk. J Hypertens 2001; 19: 871-7.
7. Blacher J, Guerin A, Pannier B, et al. Impact of aortic stiffness on survival in end-stage renal failure. Circulation 1999; 99: 2434-9.
8. Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Asmar R, et al. Aortic stiffness as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in hypertensive patients. Hypertension 2001; 37: 1236-41.
9. Gosse P. Ambulatory monitoring of QKD to assess arterial distensibility. II International Congress of Nephrology in Internet: http://www.uninet.edu/cin2001/conf/gosse/gosse.html
10. Sutton-Tyrrel K, Mackey RH, Holubkov R, et al. Measurement variation of aortic pulse wave velocity in the elderly. Am J Hypertens 2001; 14(5): 463-8.
11. Kohden N. Pulse wave transit time: a new monitoring parameter. http://www.nihonkohden.com/products/monitor/pwtt
12. Gosse P, Bemurat L, Mas D, et al. Ambulatory measurement of the QKD interval normalized to heart rate and systolic blood pressure to assess arterial distensibility — value of QKD100-60. Blood Press Monit 2001; 6: 85-9.
13. Smith RP, Argod J, Pepin J-L, Levy PA. Pulse transit time: an appraisal of potential clinical applications. Thorax 1999; 54: 452-7.
14. Yambe T, Yoshizawa M., Saijo Y, et al. Brachio-ankle pulse wave velocity and cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI). Biomed Pharmacother 2004; 58(Suppl1): S95-8.
15. Van Popele N, Grobbe DE, Bots ML, et al. Association between atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness in an elderly population. 17th Scientific Meeting of International Society of Hypertension, Workgroup on Arterial Structure and Function, Amsterdam 1998.
16. Pinto E, Bulpitt C, Beckett N, et al. Rationale and methodology of monitoring ambulatory blood pressure and arterial compliance in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial. Blood Press Monit 2006; 11: 3-8.
17. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 2007; 25: 1105-87.
Review
For citations:
Markova M.A., Tyulkina E.E., Kotovskaya Yu.V., Kobalava Zh.D. Clinical value of complex ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure and arterial rigidity in elderly patients. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2009;8(4):18-22. (In Russ.)