Persistent dyslipidemia in statin-treated patients: Russian real-world clinical practice data (Russian part of the DYSIS Study)
https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2012-4-70-78
Abstract
The high prevalence of persistent dyslipidemia in primary and specialized care patients treated with statins justifies the need to identify its reasons and develop the recommendations on the treatment optimization. At present, Russian studies focusing on the achievement of target lipid levels remain scarce, which emphasizes the importance of the problem and its further investigation.
Aim. Cross-sectional epidemiological study which assessed the prevalence of persistent dyslipidemia in statin-treated patients and analysed the predictors of the achievement of target lipid levels.
Material and methods. The lipid profile parameters were analysed in 1586 statin-treated out-patients with varied levels of cardiovascular risk, taking into account the type of lipid-lowering therapy and its doses. The assessment of the cardiovascular event (CVE) risk and the definition of target levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL–CH), as well as normal levels of triglycerides (TG) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL–CH), was based on the clinical recommendations by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC 2007) and by the European Society of Cardiology and the European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS 2011).
Results. The analysis based on the ESC 2007 recommendations has demonstrated that the target levels of LDL–CH (<2,5 mmol/l for high-risk patients) were not achieved in 53,5% of the participants. The elevation of LDL–CH levels could be isolated or combined with the HDL–CH decrease and/or the TG increase. Low levels of HDL–CH were observed in 32,3% of the patients, while high TG levels were registered in 55,6% of the participants. The achievement of target LDL–CH levels was predicted by the higher-dose statin therapy (odds ratio 0,44). The analysis based on the ESC/EAS 2011 recommendations has shown that the prevalence of target LDL–CH levels was 12,2% in very high-risk patients (<1,8 mmol/l), 30,3% in high-risk patients (<2,5 mmol/l), and 53,4% in moderate-risk patients (<3,0 mol/l).
Conclusion. Over a half of the statin-treated patients failed to achieve target levels of LDL–CH. The lowest prevalence of target LDL–CH levels was observed in very high-risk and high-risk patients. The predictors of target LDL–CH level achievement included moderate cardiovascular risk and higher-dose statin therapy. The obtained results suggest that the correction of persistent dyslipidemia in statin-treated patients could be achieved via increasing the satin dose and combining lipid-lowering medications.
About the Authors
R. G. OganovRussian Federation
V. V. Kukharchuk
Russian Federation
G. P. Arutyunov
Russian Federation
A. S. Galyavich
Russian Federation
V. S. Gurevich
Russian Federation
D. V. Duplyakov
Russian Federation
Yu. A. Karpov
Russian Federation
Zh. D. Kobalava
Russian Federation
V. O. Konstantinov
Russian Federation
S. Yu. Martsevich
Russian Federation
A. V. Panov
Russian Federation
I. V. Sergienko
Russian Federation
V. V. Skibitskyi
Russian Federation
O. G. Smolenskaya
Russian Federation
A. V. Susekov
Russian Federation
V. P. Tyurin
Russian Federation
S. V. Shalaev
Russian Federation
O. A. Maneshina
Russian Federation
O. V. Brigida
Russian Federation
References
1. World Health Report 2004. The changing history. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.
2. Ivanter VV, Ioseliani DG, Ksenofontov DG, Wasserman LV. The issues and perspectives of the development of high-technology service in cardiology in Russia. Problemi prognozirovania. Moscow 2009; 6: 70–86.
3. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R and King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: Estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 1047–53.
4. Poirier P, Giles TD, Bray GA, et al. American Heart Association; Obesity Committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: pathophysiology, evaluation, and effect of weight loss: an update of the 1997 American Heart Association Scientific Statement on Obesity and Heart Disease from the Obesity Committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Circulation 2006; 113: 898–918.
5. Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, et al. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet 2005; 366: 1267–78.
6. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators. Kearney PM, Blackwell L, Collins R, et al. Efficacy of cholesterol-lowering therapy in 18,686 people with diabetes in 14 randomised trials of statins: a metaanalysis. Lancet 2008; 371: 117–25.
7. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN, et al. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association. Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Circulation 2004; 110: 227–39. Erratum in: Circulation 2004; 110: 763.
8. Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 2375–414.
9. Shah PK, Kaul S, Nilsson J and Cercek B. Exploiting the vascular protective effects of high-density lipoprotein and its apolipoproteins: an idea whose time for testing is coming, part I. Circulation 2001; 104: 2376–83.
10. Gotto Jr AM. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides as therapeutic targets for preventing and treating coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 2002; 144 (Suppl): S33–42.
11. Barter PJ, Puranik R, Rye KA. New insights into the role of HDL as an anti-inflammatory agent in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Curr Cardiol Rep 2007; 9: 493–8.
12. McBride P. Triglycerides and risk for coronary artery disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2008; 10: 386–90.
13. Kotseva K, Wood D, De Backer G, et al. (EUROASPIRE Study Group). Cardiovascular prevention guidelines in daily practice: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I, II, and III surveys in eight European countries. Lancet 2009; 373: 929–40.
14. Van Ganse E, Laforest L, Burke T, et al. Mixed dyslipidemia among patients using lipid-lowering therapy in French general practice: an observational study. Clin Ther 2007; 29: 1671–81.
15. Phatak H, Wentworth C, Sazonov V, Burke T. Prevalence and predictors of lipid abnormalities in patients treated with statins in the UK general practice. Atherosclerosis 2009; 202: 225–33.
16. Suaґ rez C, Maiques A, Ambegaonkar BM, et al. Attainment of multiple recommended lipid levels following lipid modifying treatment in highrisk patients. PRIMULA Study, Spain. In: ISPOR 11th Ann Eur Congress, Athens, Greece, 8–11 Nov, 2008 (Abstr).
17. ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidemias. The Task Force of the management of dyslipidemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Atherosclerosis (EAS). Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 1769–818.
18. Roberts WC. The rule of 5 and the rule of 7 in lipidlowering by statin drugs. Am J Cardio 1997; 80: 106–7.
19. Maron DJ, Fazio S, Linton MF. Current perspectives on statins. Circulation 2000; 101: 207–13.
20. McPherson R, Frolich J, Fodor G, Genest J Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Canadian Cardiovascular Society position statement–recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia and the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Can J Cardiol 2006; 22: 913–27. Erratum in: Can J Cardiol 2006; 22: 1077.
21. Luc G, Bard JM, Ferrie`res J, et al. Value of HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-I, lipoprotein A-I, and lipoprotein A-I/A-II in prediction of coronary heart disease: The PRIME Study. Prospective Epidemiological Study of Myocardial Infarction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002; 22: 1155–61.
22. Bourgault C, Davignon J, Fodor G, et al. Statin therapy in Canadian patients with hypercholesterolemia: The Canadian Lipid Study – Observational (CALIPSO). Can J Cardiol 2005; 21: 1187–93.
23. Bruckert E, Baccara-Dinet M, Eschwege E. Low LDL-cholesterol is common in European Type 2 diabetic patients receiving treatment for dyslipidemia: data from a pan-European survey. Diabet Med 2007; 24: 388–91.
24. Assmann G, Benecke H, Neiss A, et al. Gap between guidelines and practice: attainment of treatment targets in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia starting statin therapy. Results of the 4E-Registry (Efficacy Calculation and Measurement of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events Including Physicians’ Experience and Evaluation). Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2006; 13: 776–83.
25. Goff Jr DC, Bertoni AG, Kramer H, et al. Dyslipidemia prevalence, treatment, and control in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA): gender, ethnicity, and coronary artery calcium. Circulation 2006; 113: 647–56.
26. Yan AT, Yan RT, Tan M, et al. Vascular Protection (VP) and Guidelines Oriented Approach to Lipid Lowering (GOALL) Registries Investigators. Contemporary management of dyslipidemia in high-risk patients: targets still not met. Am J Med 2006; 119: 676–83.
27. Grant RW, Meigs JB. Prevalence and treatment of low HDL cholesterol among primary care patients with type 2 diabetes: an unmet challenge for cardiovascular risk reduction. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 479–84.
28. Waters DD, Brotons C, Chiang CW, et al. Lipid Treatment Assessment Project 2 Investigators. Lipid treatment assessment project 2: a multinational survey to evaluate the proportion of patients achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals. Circulation 2009; 120: 28–34.
29. Walley T, Folino-Gallo P, Stephens P, Van Ganse E. Trends in prescribing and utilization of statins and other lipid lowering drugs across Europe 1997–2003. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 60: 543–51.
30. Manninen V, Tenkanen L, Koskinen P, et al. Joint effects of serum triglyceride and LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol concentrations on coronary heart disease risk in the Helsinki Heart Study: implications for treatment. Circulation 1992; 85: 37–45.
31. BIP Study Group. Secondary prevention by raising HDL cholesterol and reducing triglycerides in patients with coronary artery disease: The Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) Study. Circulation 2000; 102: 21–7.
32. Consensus Statement by the Expert Advisory Committee. Cardiovascular therapy and prevention 2012; 1: 85–8 Russian (Консенсус Совета Экспертов. Роль комбинированной гиполипидемической терапии (статин+эзетимиб) в лечении пациентов с дислипидемиями. Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика 2012; 1: 85–8).
Review
For citations:
Oganov R.G., Kukharchuk V.V., Arutyunov G.P., Galyavich A.S., Gurevich V.S., Duplyakov D.V., Karpov Yu.A., Kobalava Zh.D., Konstantinov V.O., Martsevich S.Yu., Panov A.V., Sergienko I.V., Skibitskyi V.V., Smolenskaya O.G., Susekov A.V., Tyurin V.P., Shalaev S.V., Maneshina O.A., Brigida O.V. Persistent dyslipidemia in statin-treated patients: Russian real-world clinical practice data (Russian part of the DYSIS Study). Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2012;11(4):70-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2012-4-70-78