Anti-aggregant therapy in patients with coronary heart disease and gastric ulcer

Aim. To evaluate primary haemostasis parameters during two-month Zyllt therapy in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and gastric ulcer. Material and methods. In 60 patients with CHD, hyperlipidaemia, and gastric ulcer in remission, the effects of Zyllt (clopidogrel), in combination with lipid-lowering Vasilip (simvastatin) treatment, were investigated. Antiaggregant effects of Zyllt were assessed by measuring spontaneous and ADP-induced platelet aggregation at baseline, 5 days and 2 months after the therapy start. At baseline and in the end of the study, total blood cell count, lipid profile, and the levels of hepatic enzymes and C-reactive protein were examined. Results. Without the loading dose administration, the anti-aggregant effect of Zyllt was moderate at Day 5. In 37,2 % of the patients, all aggregation parameters were normalized, while in the other participants, they remained elevated. After 2 months of the treatment, aggregation parameters normalized in 78,7 %, and remained elevated in 20,7 % (n=12). Among these 12 individuals, no spontaneous aggregation was observed in 7, while ADP-induced aggregation substantially decreased, as a marker of Zyllt effects on its therapeutic target. In addition, Vasilip demonstrated good lipid-lowering effect in the study participants. Conclusion. Zyllt is an effective anti-aggregant, which is well-tolerated, without inducing hypocoagulation. In case of combined therapy, both lipid-lowering effect of Vasilip and anti-aggregant effect of Zyllt were observed. This combination did not result in hepatic or renal disturbances, or increased risk of cardiovascular events. The effectiveness of anti-aggregant therapy could be assessed by monitoring platelet aggregation.

1. Grines CL, Bonow RO, Casey DJr, et al. Prevention of premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery stents: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American College of Surgeons, and American Dental Association, with representation from the American College of Physicians. JACC 2007; 49(6): 734-9.

2. Bhatt DL, Scheiman J, Abraham NS, et al. ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008 expert consensus document on reducing the gastrointestinal risks of antiplatelet therapy and NSAID use: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. JACC 2008; 52(18): 1502-17.

3. Ibanez L, Vidal X, Vendrell L, et al. On behalf of the SpanishItalian collaborative group for the epidemiology of gastrointestinal bleeding. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding associated with antiplatelet drugs. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 23: 235-42.

4. Vila P, Zafar M, Badimon J. Platelet reactivity and nonresponse to dual antiplatelet therapy: A review. Platelets 2009; 20(8): 531-8.

5. Matsuno H, Tokuda H, Ishisaki A, et al. P2Y12 Receptors play a significant role in the development of platelet microaggregation in patients with diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005; 90(2): 920-7.

6. Cazenave JP, Gachet C. Anti-platelet drugs: do they affect megakaryocytes? Baillieres Clin Haematol 1997; 10(1): 163-80.

7. Geiger J, Teichmann L, Grossmann R, et al. Monitoring of clopidogrel action: comparison of methods. Clin Chem 2005; 51(6): 957-65.

8. Geisler T, Langer H, Wydymus M, et al. Low response to clopidogrel is associated with cardiovascular outcome after coronary stent implantation. Eur Heart J 2006; 27(20): 2420-5.

9. Kuliczkowski W, Witkowski A, Polonski L, et al. Interindividual variability in the response to oral antiplatelet drugs: a position paper of the Working Group on antiplatelet drugs resistance appointed by the Section of Cardiovascular Interventions of the Polish Cardiac Society, endorsed by the Working Group on Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2009; 30(4): 426-35.

10. Snoep J, Hovens M, Eikenboom J, et al. Clopidogrel nonresponsiveness in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J 2007; 154: 221-31.

11. Ferreiro J, Angiolillo D. Clopidogrel response variability: current status and future directions. Thromb Haemost 2009; 102(1): 7-14.

12. Serebruany V, Cherala G, Williams C, et al. Association of platelet responsiveness with clopidogrel metabolism: role of compliance in the assessment of “resistance”. Am Heart J 2009; 158(6): 925-32.

13. Breddin H, Lippold R, Bittner M, et al. Spontaneous platelet aggregation as a predictive risk factor for vascular occlusions in healthy volunteers? Results of the HAPARG Study. Atherosclerosis 1999; 144: 211-9.

14. Lanas A, Garcia-Rodriguez L, Arroyo M. Risk of upper gastointestinal ulcer bleeding associated with selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, traditional non-aspirin non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs, aspirin and combinations. Gut 2006; 55: 1731-8.

15. Hulot J, Bura A, Villard E. Cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of function polymorphism is a major clopidogrel resistence. Blood 2006; 108(11): 2244-7.

16. Kim K, Park P, Hong S, Park J. The effect of CYP2C19 polimorhism on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodinamics of clopidogrel: a possible mechanism of clopidogrel resistance. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2008; 84: 236-42.

17. Angiolillo D, Fernandes-Ortiz A, Bernardo E. Contribution of gene sequence variations of the hepatic cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme to variability in individual responsiveness to clopidogrel. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2006; 26: 1895-900.

18. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20 536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebocontrolled trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 7-22.

19. Brophy J, Babapulle M, Costa V, Rinfret S. A pharmacoepidemiology study of the interaction between atorvastatin and clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J 2006; 152: 263-9.

20. Blagojevic A, Delaney J, Levesque L, et al. Investigation of an interaction between statins and clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention: a cohort study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2009; 18(5): 362-9.

21. Ельчанинов А.П., Чайковский Ю.Н., Саморукова Е.М., Фофанова М.А. Влияние антиагрегантов на параметры гемостаза у пациентов с хронической цереброваскулярной болезнью. Актуал вопр бол серд сосуд 2007; 3: 44-8.

22. Сивков А.С., Пауков С.В., Балугян Р.Ш. и др. Оценка фармакодинамики и клинической эффективности клопидогрела и аторвастатина у больных с острым коронарным синдромом и гиперлипидемией. Кардиоваск тер профил 2009; 8: 76-83.

23. Попонина Т.М., Попонина Ю.С., Капилевич Н.А.. Современные подходы к профилактике тромботических осложнений у больных с острым коронарным синдромом без подъема сегмента ST. Актуал вопр бол серд сосуд 2009; 8(4): 4-9.

24. Сироткина О.В., Богданова Е.В., Боганькова Н.А. и др. Эффективность антиагрегантной терапии клопидогрелом у пациентов, перенесших инфаркт миокарда с подъемом сегмента ST. Кардиоваск тер профил 2009; 8(1): 51-5.

25. Гринштейн Ю.И., Савченко, Е.А. Филоненко И.В. и др. Зилт у пациентов с атеросклерозом коронарных артерий после аортокоронарного шунтирования. Кардиоваск тер профил 2008; 7(6): 43-9.

26. Гринштейн Ю.И., Савченко, Е.А. Филоненко И.В., Савченко А.А. Зилт в сравнении с ацетилсалициловой кислотой у пациентов с атеросклерозом коронарных артерий после аортокоронарного шунтирования. Основные результаты исследования ЗЕВС: эффективность препаратов, механизм резистентности к ацетилсалициловой кислоте, ближайшие и отдаленные клинические результаты. Кардиоваск тер профил 2009; 8: 36-43.