Preview

Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention

Advanced search

Prognostic value of the psychoemotional status in patients with coronary artery disease: focus on platelet hemostatic system

https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2020-2278

Abstract

Aim. To assess the effect of psychological distress on platelet morphology depending on the severity of mixed anxiety-depressive disorder (MADD) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

Material and methods. The study included 112 patients (mean age — 60,9±1,46 years), 84 of whom were diagnosed with CAD, class II-III angina of effort and stage I-III hypertension. The assessment of psychoemotional status and type D personality was carried out using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Type D Scale-14 (DS14), respectively. The detection of platelet phenotype was performed on a high-tech XN-1000 hematology analyzer using flow cytometry.

Results. Participants were divided into two groups: group I (n=40) — patients with MADD; group II (n=44) — patients without anxiety and depression. Assessment of the interconnected effect of MADD and psychological distress on the platelet profile in patients with CAD revealed differences between groups by the platelet morphology. The average platelet count (PLT) in patients of group I was 312,1±17,17x109/L, and in patients with type D personality — 316,7±17,54x109/L, which significantly prevailed the same parameter in comparison group — 220,4±1,48x109/L (p<0,001). The average platelet distribution width (PDW) was significantly higher in group I compared with group II (17,0±0,94 fL vs 13,6±0,76 fL (p<0,05)). The mean platelet volume (MPV) in patients of group I (11,3±0,42) was significantly higher than in the comparison and control groups: 9,7±0,23 and 8,7±0,28 fL, respectively (p<06001). According to logistic regression, the independent predictors of increased platelet aggregation in cardiac patients were depression

Conclusion. Increased functional activity of platelets in patients with CAD and hypertension is due to the effect of MADD associated with type D personality.

About the Authors

F. B. Abdumalikova
Tashkent Medical Academy
Uzbekistan


N. M. Nurillaeva
Tashkent Medical Academy
Uzbekistan


References

1. Oganov RG, Gerasimenko NF, Koltunov IE, et al. The All-Russian education action “Healthy Hearts” is a large-scale prophylaxis project. Preventive Medicine. 2010;3:3-5. (In Russ.)

2. Pogosova NV, Oganov RG, Boytsov SA, et al. Psychosocial factors and life quality in coronary heart disease patients: results of the Russian part of International multicenter study EUROASPIRE IV. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2017; 16(5):20-6. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2017-5-20-26.

3. Nurillaeva NM. Analysis of the prevalence and significance of behavioral risk factors in patients with ischemic heart disease in outpatient conditions. Preventive Medicine. 2011;1:11-5. (In Russ.)

4. Boytsov SA, Pogosova NV, Bubnova MG, et al. Cardiovascular prevention 2017 National guidelines. Russ J Cardiol. 2018;23(6):7-122. (In Russ.) doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2018-6-7-122.

5. ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(17):21-6. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs092.

6. Conden E. Type D Personality. Psychometric Properties of the DS14 and Associations with Ill Health and Coronary Heart Disease in General and Clinical Populations. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. 2014. p. 74. ISBN 978-91-554-9052-2.

7. Sumin AN, Raykh OI, Indukaeva EV, et al. Prevalence of type D personality and its association with cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors according to the ESSE study conducted. Ration Pharmacother Cardiol. 2015; 11 (3):261-6. (In Russ.) doi:10.20996/1819-6446-2015-11-3-261-266.

8. Vinokurov EV, Sobennikov VS.The Relationship of depression to cardiovascular disease. Acta scientifica biomedica. 2017;2(5): 124-8. (In Russ.) Винокуров Е.В., Собенников В.С. Взаимосвязь депрессии и сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний. Acta biomedica scientifica. 2017;2(5):124-8.

9. Molloy GJ, Perkins-Porras L, Strike PS, et al. Type-D Personality and Cortisol in Survivors of Acute Coronary Syndrome. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2008;70(8):863-8. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181842e0c.

10. Williams MS. Platelets and depression in cardiovascular disease: A brief review of the current literature. World J Psychiatry. 2012;2(6):114-23. doi:10.5498/wjp.v2.i6.114.

11. Lim HE, Lee MS, Ko YH, et al. Assessment of the Type D personality construct in the Korean population: A validation study of the Korean DS14. J Korean Med Sci. 2011;26(1):116-23. doi:10.3346/jkms.2011.26.1.116.

12. Philippova OI, Koloskov AV, Stolitsa AA. Testing of platelet function. Transfusion medicine. 2012;13:493-514. (In Russ.)

13. Denollet J, Susanne P, Christiaan V, et al. Predictive value of social inhibition and negative affectivity for cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with coronary artery disease: the type D personality construct. Psychosom Med. 2013;75(9):73-81. doi:10.1097/PSY.0000000000000001.

14. Gehi A, Musselman D, Otte C, et al. Depression and platelet activation in outpatients with stable coronary heart disease: findings from the heart and soul study. Psychiatry Res. 2010;175(3):200-4. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2009.01.010.


Review

For citations:


Abdumalikova F.B., Nurillaeva N.M. Prognostic value of the psychoemotional status in patients with coronary artery disease: focus on platelet hemostatic system. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2020;19(2):2278. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2020-2278

Views: 793


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1728-8800 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0125 (Online)