Preview

Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention

Advanced search

Influence of status of heart rate autonomic control on the course of the post-infarction period and cardiac rehabilitation

https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2019-6-26-32

Abstract

Aim. To study the effect of heart rate variability parameters recorded in the acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) on the prognosis; to study laboratory and functional markers of heart failure. Material and methods. The study included 199 people. The comparison group of 79 healthy volunteers was necessary to determine the normal ranges of heart rate variability. One hundred and twenty patients on the 7th-9th day, the 24th and the 48th week of STEMI underwent a 12-lead Holter monitoring with an assessment of time parameters of heart rate variability. In the same periods, blood tests for brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were performed every 12 weeks. Observations evaluated the distance in the 6-min walk test, as well as the quality of life using the Minnesota and Seattle questionnaires.

Results. Depending on the values of heart rate variability on the 7th-9th day, all patients with STEMI were divided into 2 groups: group “S” — with a sympathetic predominance, group “N” — with balanced neurohumoral effects. We revealed twofold BNP decrease in group “H” patients by 24th week and subsequent visits. In group “S” patients, BNP levels remained high throughout the observation period. The level of hs-CRP returned to normal range by 24th week of observation in all patients. Tolerance to physical activity in group “S” was initially lower than in patients of group “H”, but by the 48th week the walking distance gradually became equal in both groups. The prevalence of ventricular tachycardia and the quality of life between groups did not statistically differ. The risk of recurrent cardiovascular events and deaths in group “S” was significantly higher than that in group “H”. Conclusion. Enhanced sympathetic activity on the 7th-9th day of STEMI was associated with an increased risk of recurrent cardiovascular events, and also adversely affected changes of heart failure laboratory markers — BNP and hs-CRP.

About the Authors

E. V. Dushina
Penza State University
Russian Federation

Penza.



M. V. Lukyanova
Penza State University
Russian Federation

Penza.



Yu. A. Barmenkova
Penza State University
Russian Federation

Penza.



L. S. Tomashevskaya
Penza State University
Russian Federation

Penza.



V. E. Oleinikov
Penza State University
Russian Federation

Penza.



References

1. Arutyunov GP. Cardiac rehabilitation. M.: MEDpressinform, 2013. р. 336. (In Russ.)

2. Wellens HJ, Schwartz PJ, Lindemans FW, et al. Risk stratification for sudden cardiac death: Current status and challenges for the future. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:1642-51. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu176.

3. La Rovere MT, Pinna GD, Maestri R, et al. GISSI-HF Investigators. Autonomic markers and cardiovascular and arrhythmic events in heart failure patients: Still a place in prognostication? Data from the GISSI-HF trial. Eur J Heart Failure. 2012;14:1410-19. doi:10.1093/eurjhf/hfs126.

4. Steinberg JS, Varma N, Cygankiewicz I, et al. 2017 ISHNE-HRS expert consensus statement on ambulatory ECG and external cardiacmonitoring/telemetry. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(7):55-96. doi:10.1111/anec.12447

5. Efremushkin GG, Efremushkina AA, Akimochkina AG. Sinus rhythm variability in patients with myocardial infarction in the process of long-term polyclinic rehabilitation with physical training. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2005;1:20-3. (In Russ.)

6. Bubnova MG, Barbarash OL, Doletsky AA, et al. Acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: aftercare and secondary prevention. National Russian Guidelines. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2015;1:6-52. (In Russ.)

7. Florea VG, Cohn JN. The Autonomic Nervous System and Heart Failure. Circulation Research. 2014; 114: 1815-26. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114

8. Kushakovskij MS, Grishkin YuN. Heart Arrhythmias: A Guide for Physicians, 4th ed., rev. and add. SPb: Foliant, 2014 p. 720. (In Russ.)

9. Belen'kova YuA, Kashtalap W, Karetnikova VN, et al. Inflammation factors affecting the prognosis in patients with myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal intervencionnoj kardioangiologii. 2012;29:51-9. (In Russ.)

10. Makoeva MH, Fedorova MM, Avtandilov AG, et al. Dynamics and prognostic value of the brain natriuretic peptide and C-reactive protein in acute myocardial infarction depending on the treatment tactics. Klinicheskaya laboratornaya diagnostika. 2014;2:23-6. (In Russ.)

11. Wang JJ, Fan Y, Zhu Y, et al. Biomarkers enhance the long-term predictive ability of the KAMIR risk score in Chinese patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Chin Med J (Engl). 2019;132(1):30-41. doi:101097/CM9.0000000000000015

12. Jernberg T, James S, Lindahl B, et al. NT-pro BNP in unstable coronary artery disease-experiences from the FAST, GUSTO IV and FRISC II trials. Eur J Heart Failure. 2004;6(3):319-25.


Review

For citations:


Dushina E.V., Lukyanova M.V., Barmenkova Yu.A., Tomashevskaya L.S., Oleinikov V.E. Influence of status of heart rate autonomic control on the course of the post-infarction period and cardiac rehabilitation. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2019;18(6):26-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2019-6-26-32

Views: 1513


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1728-8800 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0125 (Online)