Changes in pattern of complications in acute myocardial infarction over a ten-year follow-up: gender specificities
https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2020-2325
Abstract
Aim. To compare changes in pattern of complications in acute myocardial infarction (MI) among Tomsk population at the age of >20 years over a ten-year follow-up period (2008-2017).
Material and methods. The study was carried out on the basis of the World Health Organization Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry. In 2008, 800 MI cases were recorded (62,4% — men; 37,6% — women (p<0,001)). In 2017, acute MI was restarted in 906 patients (58,1% — men; 41,9% — women (p<0,05)). According to age pattern in 2008, there were 62,1% of patients >60 years of age (among men — 49,1%; among women — 83,7% (p<0,0001)), which after 10 years were 74,5 % (p<0,001).
Results. In 2008, a complicated course of MI was observed in 49,9% of patients, in 2017, much more often — in 80,4% of patients (p<0,001). Over the analyzed period, incidence of acute aneurysm, myocardial rupture, and recurrent MI decreased. At the same time, the number of patients with post-MI heart failure (HF) significantly increased. In 2008, there were no significant differences in the incidence of MI complications in men and women. The most common complication in both men and women was arrhythmias and conduction disorders. After 10 years, the statistics remained virtually unchanged, with the exception of pulmonary embolism, which was significantly more common in women. Noteworthy is a significant increase in the number of HF patients (among men and women).
Conclusion. Over a ten-year follow-up period, significant changes in patterns of MI complications in Tomsk were not revealed. It should be noted that MI became more severe and was more often accompanied by complications, the most common of which was HF. This is due to an increase in the age pattern of elderly and senile patients.
About the Authors
S. A. OkruginRussian Federation
Tomsk
A. N. Repin
Russian Federation
Tomsk
References
1. Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J. 2016;37(29):2315-81. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106.
2. Bobrovskaya EE, Burova NN, Kon VE. Predictors of complicated course and poor prognosis in patients with myocardial infarction. Hypertension. 2009;5(15):539-42. (In Russ.) doi:10.18705/1607-419X-2009-15-5-539-542.
3. Markov VA, Ryabov VV, Maksimov IV, et al. Yesterday, today and tomorrow in the diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Siberian Medical Journal 2011;2:8-13. (In Russ.)
4. Provotorov VM, Shevchenko II. Long-term trends and predictors of the course and outcome of acute coronary syndrome. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2012;(5):40-5. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2012-5-40-45.
5. WHO. Major risk factors leading to disability in old age, and measures for its prevention? Regional Office Report. Geneva. 2003. p. 3. (In Russ.)
6. Novikova NA, Gendlin GE, Storozhakov GI. Gender differences in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Heart failure. 2008;3:137- 43. (In Russ.)
7. Gurevich MA, Mravyan SR, Grigorieva NM. Coronary heart disease in women. Difficult Patient. 2006;12:1-13. (In Russ.)
8. Karpov RS, Mordovin VF. Diagnosis and treatment of ischemic disease hearts in women. Tomsk 2002;196 р. (In Russ.)
9. Anderson GD. Sex and racial differences in pharmacological response. Where is the evidence? Pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodinamics. J Womens Health. 2005;14:19- 29. doi:10.1089/jwh.2005.14.19.
10. Betig Z, Mazur NA, Metelitsa VI. Comparative data on myocardial infarction registers in Moscow and Berlin. Epidemiology of cardiovascular diseases. M.: Medicine. 1977;166-93. (In Russ.).
11. The third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2013;2(100): Appendix 1:3-16. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2013-2s1-3-16.
12. Yakovlev VV. Age features of primary and recurrent myocardial infarction in men. Bulletin of the National Medical-Surgical Center. N.I. Pirogov 2010;2(5):90-3. (In Russ.)
13. Garganeeva AA, Okrugin SA, Borel KN, et al. Myocardial infarction at the turn of two centuries: demographic and social trends. Clinical Medicine. 2016;94(6):463-6. (In Russ.) doi:10.18821/0023-2149-2016-94-6-463-467.
Review
For citations:
Okrugin S.A., Repin A.N. Changes in pattern of complications in acute myocardial infarction over a ten-year follow-up: gender specificities. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2020;19(3):2325. https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2020-2325