PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF INTSTRUMENTAL DIAGNOSTICS IN CHRONIC CORONARY HEART DISEASE. DATA FROM “PROGNOS CHD”
https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2014-4-29-35
Abstract
Aim. To study the role of instrumental findings in the evaluation of long-term outcomes and life for stable coronary heart disease patients (CHD) in the “PROGNOS CHD” registry.
Material and methods. In the frame of registry the retro-, prospective, observational, cohort study is performed, that included all patients inhabitants of Moscow region, consequently admitted to the hospital of SSRCPM from 01.01.2004 to 31.12.2007 planned with the admittance dignosis “CHD”, and for whom the coronary arteriography was done. Totally 641 pt (500 male, 141 female). Mean follow-up period 3,9 years (0,76–6,52). At the end the life status defined for 551 (86%) patient. Into analysis the data from instrumental methods included: ECG, echocardiography (Echo), exercise testing (ET).
Results. The risk for primary endpoint (PEP) was increased by: scar changes in resting ECG — 2,2 times (p=0,0007), tachicardia 2,7 times (p=0,02), rhythm disorders 1,76 times (p=0,04); valve stenoses by Echo — 3 times (p=0,04), ventricle dilation 1,8 times (p=0,02), local contractility defects 1,8 times (p<0,003); ST horizontal depression during ET — 2,2 times (p=0,04, ns by crosstabulation). Risk of PEP decreased by the ET possibility to perform — by 1,6 times (p=0,049), normal EF by 1,5 times (p=0,001). The prevalence of secondary endpoint was increased by: scar changes on ECG — 1,5 times (p=0,01); positive ET — 13,2 times (p=0,01), downsloping ST depression at ET — 2,1 times (p=0,01), low and medium exercise tolerance — 2,8 (p=0,04) and 2,1 times (p=0,04), resp. The worse for PEP were scar changes on ECG, dilation of the heart chambers, disordered local contractility of LV, valve stenoses by Echo, and positively influenced outcomes — normal EF and the fact of ET performing.
Conclusion. High predictive significance of various broad known instrumental methods of diagnostics, like resting ECG, Echo or ET, make possible to use them for risk stratification of cardiovascular complications development in chronic CHD and for defining of indications to invasive diagnostic procedures.About the Authors
S. N. TolpyginaRussian Federation
tel./fax: 8 (906) 793–92–63
S. Yu. Martsevich
Russian Federation
E. A. Gofman
Russian Federation
A. D. Deev
Russian Federation
References
1. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease. The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2013;3 4: 2949–3003 — doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ eht296.
2. Martsevich SYu, Tolpygina SN, Malysheva AM, et al. Role of selected parameters and integral indices of treadmill test in the assessment of complication risk among patients with chronic coronary heart disease. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention 2012; 11 (2): 44–52. Russian (Марцевич С.Ю., Толпыгина С.Н., Малышева А.М. др. Роль отдельных показателей и интегральных показателей и интегральных индексов пробы с дозированной физической нагрузкой на тредмиле в оценке риска осложнений у пациентов с хронической ишемической болезнью сердца. Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика 2012; 11 (2): 44–52).
3. Martsevich SYu, Tolpygina SN, Malysheva AM, et al. Role of selected parameters and integral indices of treadmill test in the assessment of seriousness of coronary arteries stenosis among patients with chronic coronary heart disease. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention 2013; 12 (5): 22–8. Russian (Марцевич С.Ю., Толпыгина С.Н., Малышева А.М. и др. Значение отдельных показателей и интегральных показателей и интегральных индексов пробы с дозированной физической нагрузкой на тредмиле для выявления тяжести стенотического поражения коронарных артерий. Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика 2013; 12 (5): 22–8).
4. Committee of experts of VNOK. Diagnostics and treatment of stable stenocardia. Russian references (the second revision). Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention 2008; 7 (6); Appendix 4: 40. Russian (Комитет экспертов ВНОК. Диагностика и лечение стабильной стенокардии. Российские рекомендации (второй пересмотр). Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика 2008; 7 (6); Приложение 4: 40).
5. Aronov DM, Lupanov VP. Functional assays in a cardiology. Third edition. Moscow. “Medical press inform” 2007; 328 p. Russian (Аронов Д. М., Лупанов В.П. Функциональные пробы в кардиологии. Третье издание. Москва. “МЕДпресс-информ” 2007; 328 с).
6. Teichholz LE, Kreulen T, Herman MV, et al. Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence of absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol 1976; 37 (1): 7–11.
7. Gohlke HK. Identification of high-risk patients with coronary artery disease and good left ventricular function. Pract Cardiol 1988; 14 (1): 99–106.
8. The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 2501–5.
9. Aronov DM, Lupanov VP. Atherosclerosis and coronary disease of heart. M.: Triad-X 2008; 248 p. Russian (Аронов Д.М., Лупанов В.П. Атеросклероз и коронарная болезнь сердца. М.: Триада-X 2008; 248 с).
10. Hammermeister KE, DeRouen TA, Dodge HT. Variables predictive of survival in patients with coronary disease. Selection by univariate and multivariate analyses from the clinical, electrocardiographic, exercise, arteriographic, and quantitative angiographic evaluations. Circulation 1979; 59: 421–30.
11. Diaz A, Bourassa MG, Guertin MC, Tardif JC. Long-term prognostic value of resting heart rate in patients with suspected or proven coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 967–74.
12. Masur NA. Sudden death of patients with coronary heart disease. Moscow 1985 of prod. Medicine. 193 p. Russian (Мазур Н.А. Внезапная смерть больных ишемиче- ской болезнью сердца. Москва 1985 г. изд. Медицина. 193 с).
13. Lupanov VP. Depression of risk of complications and improvement of the quality of life at patients with chronic coronary heart disease. The Reference book of the polyclinic doctor 2009; 6: 15–9. Russian (Лупанов В.П. Снижение риска осложнений и улуч- шение прогноза жизни у больных хронической ишемической болезнью сердца. Справ. поликлин. врача 2009; 6: 15–9).
14. Dalya C, Norrieb J, Murdochc DL, et al. for the TIBET (Total Ischemic Burden European Trial) study group. The value of routine non-invasive tests to predict clinical outcome in stable angina. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 532–40.
15. Massie BM, Carson JJ, McMurray, et al. Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2008; 359 (23): 2456–67.
16. Lupanov VP. Prognostic indexes and predictors of electric instability of a myocardium at an exercise tolerance test at patients with coronary heart disease. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention 2006; 5: 10–2. Russian (Лупанов В.П. Прогностические индексы и предикторы электрической нестабильности миокарда при пробе с физической нагрузкой у больных ишемической болезнью сердца. Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика 2006; 5: 10–2).
Review
For citations:
Tolpygina S.N., Martsevich S.Yu., Gofman E.A., Deev A.D. PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF INTSTRUMENTAL DIAGNOSTICS IN CHRONIC CORONARY HEART DISEASE. DATA FROM “PROGNOS CHD”. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2014;13(4):29-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2014-4-29-35