Assessment of criteria influencing the location of healthcare facilities in small and hard-to-reach areas

Aim. To identify and systematize the criteria influencing the location of healthcare facilities in small and hard-to-reach areas.

Material and methods. Within the study, regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation and methodological guidelines on territorial planning were analyzed. Content analysis and statistical methods were used.

Results. The following criteria for a comprehensive assessment of the location of healthcare facilities should be used: 1. Age structure of the population. 2. Distance to a similar medical organization. 3. Population size within the working radius of the organization. 4. Availability of public roads (criteria and categories of roads). 5. Availability of public transport. 6. Climatic. 7. Availability of medical workers residing in the locality. 8. Availability of mobile medical teams. 9. Dilapidation and breakdown of buildings. Taking into account various criteria affecting the accessibility of primary health care to a patient, it is possible to develop and implement management decisions on the rational placement of healthcare facilities at the regional level with detail for each locality.

Conclusion. The use of criteria in territorial planning for a comprehensive assessment of the location of healthcare facilities makes it possible to take into account regional climatic, geographic, infrastructural, social and other features of the Russian constituent entities. This contributes to the implementation of development targets for primary health care in small and hard-to-reach areas.

1. Brazovskaya NG, Deev IA, Kobyakova OS, et al. Patient-centered approach: analysis of the relationship between patients’ assessment of the effectiveness of medical care and the conditions for its provision. Social aspects of public health [online edition]. 2019;65(5):1. (In Russ.) doi:10.21045/2071-5021-2019-65-5-1.

2. Dianov SV, Kalashnikov KN, Rigin VA. Agent-based modeling of regional healthcare: solving the problem of formalizing the medical activities of residents. Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast. 2022;15(1):55-73. (In Russ.) doi:10.15838/esc.2022.1.79.3.

3. Khalfin RA, Madyanova VV, Stolbov AP, et al. The concept of an orga nizational model of a patient-oriented medical care system in the context of digital transformation of healthcare. Problems of stan dardization in healthcare. 2019;(11-12):50-7. (In Russ.) doi:10.26347/16072502201911-12050-057.

4. Bylina SG. Mortality of the urban and rural population of the Russian Federation by causes of death: comparative analysis. International Research Journal. 2020;(10):92-103. (In Russ.) doi:10.23670/IRJ.2020.100.10.054.

5. Shchur AE, Timonin SA. Center-periphery differences in life expectancy in Russia: regional analysis. Demographic overview. 2020;7(3):108-33. (In Russ.) doi:10.17323/demreview.v7i3.11638.

6. Fomichev IA. The concept and criteria of hard-to-reach and sparsely populated areas. Legal science. 2020;12:57-60. (In Russ.)

7. Prokhorenko NF, Gaponova EA, Petrachkov IV, et al. Ensuring accessibility and quality of primary health care. GORZDRAV: news, opinions, training. Herald of the VSHOUZ. 2019;5(4):20-42. (In Russ.). doi:10.24411/2411-86212019-14002.