Hypertensive patients in hospital practice: comparative characteristics of patients with and without 24-hour blood pressure monitoring data
https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2024-4012
EDN: UIPZMF
Abstract
Aim. To study the features of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) in patients with hypertension (HTN) and comorbid pathologies within the hospital registry of a multidisciplinary medical center.
Material and methods. The study was carried out within the GARANT hospital registry. This registry included 5781 patients. The HTN in the electronic patient record was revealed in 4725 (81,7%) patients (age 65,5±11,3 years, men 51,7%). Of these, ABPM was performed in 16,8% of patients (HTN+ABPM), 83,2% were in the comparison group (HTN without ABPM). The characteristics of patients in these groups were compared and ABPM feasibility was assessed.
Results. In the HTN+ABPM group compared with the HTN without ABPM group, the mean age of patients was 63,9±13,9 vs 65,8±10,7 (p<0,01), women — 59,1 vs 46,1% (p<0,01), the mean number of cardiovascular diseases — 2,15±1,16 vs 2,68±1,16 (p<0,01), the mean number of non-cardiac diseases — 2,92±1,35 vs 2, 61±1,37 (p<0,01), office systolic and diastolic BP — 146,7±22,1/83,9±11,6 vs 136,9±19,7/79,2±10,4 mm Hg (p<0,01), respectively. The predominant blood pressure phenotype in the HTN+ABPM group is white coat hypertension (including during treatment) (49,2%). According to linear regression, the white coat effect is significantly positively associated with age, female sex, and negatively associated with prior myocardial infarction.
Conclusion. The GARANT registry results revealed that in-hospital ABPM was more often performed on younger people, mainly women, with less severe cardiovascular multimorbidity. These patients were characterized by a higher level of office BP upon admission to hospital and a higher prevalence of HTN as the only cardiovascular disease. Carrying out ABPM in patients included in the registry seems justified.
About the Authors
T. S. IlyinaRussian Federation
Moscow
V. M. Gorbunov
Russian Federation
Moscow
M. M. Lukyanov
Russian Federation
Moscow
Ya. N. Koshelyaevskaya
Russian Federation
Moscow
O. M. Drapkina
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Mancia G, Kreutz R, Brunström M, et al. 2023 ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension: Endorsed by the International Society of Hypertension (ISH) and the European Renal Association (ERA) [published correction appears in J Hypertens. 2024;42(1):194]. J Hypertens. 2023;41(12):1874-2071. doi:10.1097/HJH.0000000000003480.
2. Stergiou GS, Palatini P, Parati G, et al. 2021 European Society of Hypertension practice guidelines for office and out-of-office blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens. 2021;39(7):1293-302. doi:10.1097/HJH.0000000000002843.
3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2006). Chronic diseases and associated risk factors in Australia. 2006:3-5. Canberra: AIHW. ISBN: 978 1 74024 619 4.
4. Fotherby MD, Critchley D, Potter JF. Effect of hospitalization on conventional and 24-hour blood pressure. Age Ageing. 1995; 24(1):25-9. doi:10.1093/ageing/24.1.25.
5. Pikilidou MI, Tsirou E, Stergiou GS, et al. Effect of hospitalization on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure of hypertensive patients. Hypertens Res. 2010;33(10):995-9. doi:10.1038/hr.2010.127.
6. Conen D, Martina B, Perruchoud AP, et al. High prevalence of newly detected hypertension in hospitalized patients: the value of inhospital 24-h blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens. 2006;24(2):301-6. doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000200510.95076.2d.
7. Vanhaecke J, Van Cleemput J, Droogné W, et al. Out-patient versus in-hospital ambulatory 24-h blood pressure monitoring in heart transplant recipients. J Hum Hypertens. 1999;13(3):199-202. doi:10.1038/sj.jhh.1000782.
8. Cappelleri C, Janoschka A, Berli R, et al. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in very elderly patients: Comparison of in-hospital versus home follow-up results. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(34):e7692. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000007692.
9. Del Giorno R, Balestra L, Heiniger PS, Gabutti L. Blood pressure variability with different measurement methods: Reliability and predictors. A proof of concept cross sectional study in elderly hypertensive hospitalized patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(28):e16347. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000016347.
10. Loukianov MM, Boytsov SA, Yakushin SS, et al. Concomitant cardiovascular diseases and antihypertensive treatment in out-patient practice (by the RECVASA Registry data). Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2016;12(1):4-15. (In Russ.) doi:10.20996/1819-6446-2016-12-1-4-15.
11. Hernández-del Rey R, Martin-Baranera M, Sobrino J, et al. Reproducibility of the circadian blood pressure pattern in 24-h versus 48-h recordings: the Spanish Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Registry. J Hypertens. 2007;25(12):2406-12. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282effed1.
12. Popugaev AI, Rybakov DA, Banshchikov GT, et al. Arterial hypertension registry in Vologda Region. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2007;6(2):23-7. (In Russ.)
13. Golikov AP, Lukjanov MM, Polumiskov VYu, et al. Hypertensive crises in patients with essential arterial hypertension and coronary heart disease: new perspectives in treatment and prevention. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2005; 4(3, ч.I):10-6. (In Russ.) EDN: ISVWJL
14. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2013;34(28):2159-219. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht151.
15. Parati G, Stergiou G, O'Brien E, et al. European Society of Hypertension practice guidelines for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens. 2014;32(7):1359-66. doi:10.1097/HJH.0000000000000221.
16. Gorbunov VM, Smirnova MI. Нow to diagnose masked arterial hypertension? Nizhny Novgorod: DECOM, 2012:14-31. (In Russ.) ISBN: 978-5-89533-258-0.
17. O'Brien E, Parati G, Stergiou G, et al. European Society of Hypertension position paper on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring [published correction appears in J Hypertens. 2013 Dec;31(12):2467]. J Hypertens. 2013;31(9):1731-68. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e328363e964.
18. Gorostidi M, Banegas JR, de la Sierra A, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in daily clinical practice — the Spanish ABPM Registry experience. Eur J Clin Invest. 2016;46(1):92-8. doi:10.1111/eci.12565.
Supplementary files
What is already known about the subject?
- The creation of a medical registry makes it possible to evaluate in hospital practice the main characteristics of patients, the structure of cardiovascular and concomitant non-cardiac pathology, as well as the results of paraclinical investigations.
What might this study add?
- The features of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in patients with hypertension and comorbidities were studied within the hospital registry of a multidisciplinary medical center.
- The results of ABPM and the distribution of blood pressure phenotypes in clinical practice were analyzed.
- The rationale of in-hospital ABPM in a multidisciplinary medical center was assessed.
Review
For citations:
Ilyina T.S., Gorbunov V.M., Lukyanov M.M., Koshelyaevskaya Ya.N., Drapkina O.M. Hypertensive patients in hospital practice: comparative characteristics of patients with and without 24-hour blood pressure monitoring data. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2024;23(7):4012. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2024-4012. EDN: UIPZMF