GENDER SPECIFICS OF SUBFRACTIONAL PLASMA LIPOPROTEIDS DISTRIBUTION
https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2016-4-70-74
Abstract
Aim. To find out, whether there is specifics of subfractional distribution of plasma lipoproteides in men and women depending on coronary atherosclerosis.
Material and methods. Totally 310 patients included (203 males, 107 females), underwent coronary arteriography; lesion of artery was assessed with Gensini Score (GS). Subfractional spectrum of plasma lipoproteides was studied via electrophoresis in 3% polyacrylamid gel with Lipoprint system (Quantimetrix Lipoprint System, USA).
Results. In the group without lesion (GS =0) gender differences of lipids, apolipoproteides and glucose utilization parameters were absent. Among coronary atherosclerosis patients (GS >0) males had lower concentrations of low and high density cholesterol (LDL, HDL), as Apo A1 and Apo B. Males with GS =0, as with GS >0 differed from females by lower lipoproteides of intermediate density (LID) — LID B and LID A, and higher part of LDL 2 and small dense particles LDL 3, but mean size of LDL particles was smaller. There were no differences in HDL subfractions distribution among men and women, but in men only if coronary atherosclerosis, there were lower cholesterol concentrations found in all HDL subfractions.
Conclusion. Gender differences are revealed in subfractional spectrum of LID and LDL: in men regardless coronary atherosclerosis with the same and even lower level of LDL cholesterol there was accumulation of more atherogenic small dense LDL particles. Gender differences in the part of HDL subfractions were not found, but in men concentration of cholesterol in each of subfractions, with coronary lesion, was lower than in women.
About the Authors
I. N. OzerovaRussian Federation
V. A. Metelskaya
Russian Federation
N. E. Gavrilova
Russian Federation
References
1. Oganov RG, Maslennikova GYa. Specifics of cardiovascular pathology. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention 2012; 11(4): 101-4. Russian (Оганов Р. Г., Масленникова Г. Я. Гендерные различия кардиоваскулярной патологии. Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика 2012; 11(4): 101-4).
2. Mascarenhas-Melo F, Sereno J, Teixeira-Lemos E, et al. Markers of increased cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal women: focus on oxidized-LDL and HDL subpopulations. Disease Markers 2013; 5(2): 85-96.
3. Cifkova R, Krajcoviechova A. Dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease in women. Curr Cardiol Rep 2015; 17(7): 609-18.
4. Berneis KK, Krauss RM. Metabolic origins and clinical significance of LDL heterogeneity. J Lipid Res 2002 ;43: 1363-79.
5. Koba S, Yokota Y, Hirano T, et al. Small LDL-cholesterol is superior to LDL-cholesterol for determining severe coronary atherosclerosis. J Atheroscler Thromb 2008; 15(5): 250-60.
6. Annema W, von Eckard A. High-density lipoproteins. Multifunctional but vulnerable protections from atherosclerosis. Circ J 2013; 77: 2432-48.
7. Srisawasdi P, Vanavanan S, Rochanawutanon M, et al. Heterogeneous properties of intermediateand low-density lipoprotein subpopulations. Clin Biochem 2013; 46(15): 1509-15.
8. El Khoudary SR, Brooks MM, Thurston RC, et al. Lipoprotein subclasses and endogenous sex hormones in women at midlife. J Lipid Res 2014; 55(7): 1498-504.
9. Vaidya D, Dobs A, Gapstur SM, et al. The association of endogenous sex hormones with lipoprotein subfraction profile in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Metabolism 2008; 57(6): 782-90.
10. Anagnostis P, Stevenson JC, Crook D, et al. Effects of menopause, gender and age on lipids and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol subfractions. Maturitas 2015; 81(1): 62-8.
11. Hoefner DM, Hodel SD, O'Brein JF, et al. Development of a rapid, quantitative method for LDL subfractionation with use of the Quantimetrix Lipoprint LDL System. Clin Chem 2001; 47(2): 266-74.
12. Gavrilova NE, Metelskaya VA, Perova NV, et al. Selection for the quantitative evaluation method of coronary arteries based upon comparative analysis of angiographic scales. Russ J Cardiol 2014; 6(110): 24-9. Russian (Гаврилова Н. Е., Метельская В. А., Перова Н. В. и др. Выбор метода количественной оценки поражения коронарных артерий на основе сравнительного анализа анги-ографических шкал. Российский кардиологический журнал 2014, 6(110): 24-9).
13. Mombelli G, Bosisio R, Calabresi L, et al. Gender-related lipid and/or lipoprotein responses to statins in subjects in primary and secondary prevention. J Clin Lipidol 2015; 9(2): 226-33.
14. Decewicz DJ, Neatrour DM, Burke A, et al. Effects of cardiovascular lifestyle change on lipoprotein subclass profiles defined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Lipids Health Dis 2009; 8: 26-39.
15. Gomaraschi M, Adorni MP, Banach M, et al. Effects of established hypolipidemic drugs on HDL concentration, subclass distribution, and function. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2015; 224: 593-615.
Review
For citations:
Ozerova I.N., Metelskaya V.A., Gavrilova N.E. GENDER SPECIFICS OF SUBFRACTIONAL PLASMA LIPOPROTEIDS DISTRIBUTION. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2016;15(4):70-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2016-4-70-74