Preview

Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention

Advanced search

Fatty liver index as a predictor of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events in Russians: analysis of an epidemiological cohort

https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2025-4589

EDN: YHBWZB

Abstract

Aim. To study the associations of a high fatty liver index (FLI ≥60) with the risk of death and nonfatal cardiovascular events in a Russian epidemiological cohort.

Material and methods. The analysis included data from ESSE-RF2 epidemiological study. FLI was calculated using the Bedogni G et al. equation (2006). A high FLI ≥60 was considered a predictor of liver steatosis. A total of 5381 individuals aged 25-64 years from 4 Russian regions (the Republic of Karelia, Krasnodar Krai, Omsk and Ryazan Oblasts) were included, of which 1672 had FLI ≥60. Fatal endpoints included all-cause (ACD) and cardiovascular death (CVD), while nonfatal endpoints included myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), heart failure progression (hospitalization), and revascularization. The composite endpoint (CE) included cardiovascular death or a non-fatal endpoint. Statistical analysis was performed using the R language and environment (version 4.2). The significance level for all tested hypotheses was p<0,05.

Results. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed that the group of patients with a FLI ≥60 had significantly worse survival outcomes compared to the group with an FLI <30, for both death (ACD, p<0,001 and CVD, p=0,004) and CE (p<0,001). In the Cox regression model adjusted for region (M1), FLI ≥60 was significantly associated with ACD (HR 2,61 [95% CI: 1,55-4,41], p=0,001), CVD (HR 4,28 [1,8-10,15], p=0,001), non-fatal CVA (HR 4,89 [1,86-12,84], p=0,001), and CE (HR 3,8 [2,26-6,38], p=0,001). In the model adjusted for region, sex, and age (M2), the association of a high FLI with CVA (p=0,036) and CE (p=0,004) persisted, while in M3 (M2 + lifestyle factors and lipid metabolism disorders) it was only associated with CE (HR 1,93 [1,06-3,51], p=0,031).

Conclusion. In the group of individuals with a FLI ≥60, survival rates were significantly lower than in the group with a FLI <30 for all studied outcomes (ACD, CVD, and CE). In a univariate Cox regression model adjusted for region, a high FLI was associated with non-fatal CVA, ACD, CVD, and CE. However, in a multivariable model (adjusted for region, age, sex, lifestyle factors, and lipid metabolism disorders), a significant association of FLI ≥60 remained only with CE.

About the Authors

S. E. Evstifeeva
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Petroverigsky per., 10, bld. 3, Moscow, 101990



S. A. Shalnova
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Petroverigsky per., 10, bld. 3, Moscow, 101990



V. A. Kutsenko
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Petroverigsky per., 10, bld. 3, Moscow, 101990



А. V. Kapustina
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Petroverigsky per., 10, bld. 3, Moscow, 101990



G. A. Muromtseva
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Petroverigsky per., 10, bld. 3, Moscow, 101990



Yu. A. Balanova
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Petroverigsky per., 10, bld. 3, Moscow, 101990



A. E. Imaeva
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Petroverigsky per., 10, bld. 3, Moscow, 101990



N. S. Karamnova
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Petroverigsky per., 10, bld. 3, Moscow, 101990



M. B. Kotova
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Petroverigsky per., 10, bld. 3, Moscow, 101990



S. A. Maksimov
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Petroverigsky per., 10, bld. 3, Moscow, 101990



O. A. Litinskaya
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Petroverigsky per., 10, bld. 3, Moscow, 101990



M. S. Pokrovskaya
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Petroverigsky per., 10, bld. 3, Moscow, 101990



E. M. Filichkina
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Petroverigsky per., 10, bld. 3, Moscow, 101990



A. G. Soplenkova
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Petroverigsky per., 10, bld. 3, Moscow, 101990



L. I. Gomanova
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Petroverigsky per., 10, bld. 3, Moscow, 101990



O. B. Shvabskaya
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Petroverigsky per., 10, bld. 3, Moscow, 101990



Yu. Yu. Samokhina
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Petroverigsky per., 10, bld. 3, Moscow, 101990



I. A. Viktorova
Omsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

Lenina str., 12, Omsk, 644099



N. N. Prishchepa
City Polyclinic № 1
Russian Federation

Sverdlova str., 20, Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia, 185035



A. N. Redko
Kuban State Medical University
Russian Federation

Mitrofan Sedin str., 4, Krasnodar, 350063



S. S. Yakushin
Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University
Russian Federation

Vysokovoltnaya str., 9, Ryazan, 390026



O. M. Drapkina
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Petroverigsky per., 10, bld. 3, Moscow, 101990



References

1. Lazebnik LB, Konev YuV. Historical features and semantic diffi culties of using the terms denoting multiplicity of diseases in one patient. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2018;(6):4-9. (In Russ.)

2. Drapkina OM, Korneeva ON. Continuum of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: from hepatic steatosis to cardiovascular risk. Ra­tio­nal Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2016;12(4):424-9. (In Russ.) doi:10.20996/1819-6446-2016-12-4-424-429.

3. Wu W, Xiang J, Chen X. Association between diabetes mellitus and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among individuals with ultrasound-­defined non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Front Endo­crinol. 2021;12:773342. doi:10.3389/fendo.2021.773342.

4. Mantovani A, Csermely A, Petracca G, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gas­tro­enterol Hepatol. 2021;6(11):903-13. doi:10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00308-3.

5. Athyros VG, Tziomalos K, Katsiki N, et al. Cardiovascular risk across the histological spectrum and the clinical manifestations of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an update. World J Gastro­enterol. 2015;21(22):6820-34. doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i22.6820.

6. Canbay A, Kachru N, Haas JS, et al. Patterns and predictors of mortality and disease progression among patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020; 52(7):1185-94. doi:10.1111/apt.16016.

7. Stepanova M, Rafiq N, Makhlouf H, et al. Predictors of all-cause mortality and liver-­related mortality in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58(10):3017-23. doi:10.1007/s10620-013-2743-5.

8. Drapkina OM, Ivashkin VT. Epidemiologic features of non-alco­holic fatty liver disease in Russia (Results of open multicenter pros­pective observational study DIREG L 01903). Russian Jour­nal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2014;24(4):32-8. (In Russ.)

9. Kotovskaya YuV. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and cardio­vas­cular risks: A review. Consilium Medicum. 2023;25(4):253-8. (In Russ.) Котовская Ю. В. Неалкогольная жировая болезнь печени и сердечно-­сосудистые риски. Consilium Medicum. 2023;25(4):253-8. doi:10.26442/20751753.2023.4.202275.

10. Park J, Kim G, Kim H, et al. The associations between changes in hepatic steatosis and heart failure and mortality: a nationwide cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21:287. doi:10.1186/s12933-022-01725-z.

11. Rowe IA, Parker R. The diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver di­sease should carry important prognostic information. Nat Rev Gast­ro­enterol Hepatol. 2019;16(8):449-50. doi:10.1038/s41575-019-0168-0.

12. Liu Y, Zhong GC, Tan HY, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):11124. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-47687-3.

13. EASL-EASD-EASO. Clinical Practice Guideline for the mana­gement of non-alcoholic liver disease. European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO). J Hepatol. 2016;64:1388-402. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2015.11.004.

14. Kaneva AM, Bojko ER. Fatty liver index (FLI): more than a marker of hepatic steatosis. J Physiol Biochem. 2024;80(1):11-26. doi:10.1007/s13105-023-00991-z.

15. Zhirkov II, Gordienko AV, Pavlovich IM, et al. Noninvasive methods of diagnosis of steatosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2020;177(5):61-6. (In Russ.) doi:10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-177-5-61-66.

16. Ivashkin VT, Drapkina OM, Mayev IV, et al. Prevalence of non-al­co­holic fatty liver disease in out-patients of the Russian Fe­de­ration: DIREG 2 study results. Russian Journal of Gastro­en­te­ro­lo­gy, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2015;6:31-41. (In Russ.)

17. Niu Y, Wang G, Feng X, et al. Significance of fatty liver index to detect prevalent ischemic heart disease: evidence from na­tio­nal health and nutrition examination survey 1999-2016. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1171754. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1171754.

18. Bedogni G, Gastaldelli A, Foschi FG, et al. Fatty liver, car­dio­metabolic disease and mortality. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2020; 31(1):27-31. doi:10.1097/MOL.0000000000000652.

19. Research organizing committee of the ESSE-RF project. Epi­de­miology of cardiovascular diseases in different regions of Russia (ESSE-RF). The rationale for and design of the study. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2013;16(6):25-34. (In Russ.)

20. Bedogni G, Bellentani S, Miglioli L, et al. The Fatty Liver Index: A simple and accurate predictor of hepatic steatosis in the general population. BMC Gastroenterol. 2006;6:33. doi:10.1186/1471-230X-6-33.

21. Evstifeeva SE, Shalnova SA, Kutsenko VA, et al. Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease among the working-age population: associations with socio-­demographic indicators and behavioral risk factors (ESSE RF-2 data). Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2022;21(9):3356. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2022-3356.

22. Shahbazi F, Doosti-­Irani A, Soltanian A, et al. Global forecasting of chronic kidney disease mortality rates and numbers with the generalized additive model. BMC Nephrol. 2024;25:286. doi:10.1186/s12882-024-03720-w.

23. Chung GE, Jeong SM, Cho EJ, et al. Association of fatty liver in­dex with all-cause and disease-­specific mortality: A nationwide co­hort study. Metabolism. 2022;133:155222. doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2022.155222.

24. Olubamwo OO, Virtanen JK, Pihlajamäki J, et al. Association of fatty liver disease with mortality outcomes in an Eastern Finland male cohort. B.M.J. Open Gastro. 2019;6:e000219. doi:10.1136/ bmjgast-2018-000219.

25. Hoo ZX, Candlish J, Teare D. What is an ROC curve? Emerg Med J. 2017;34:357-9. doi:10.1136/emermed-2017-206735.

26. Park PG, Pyo JY, Ahn SS, et al. Fatty Liver Index Independently Predicts All-­Cause Mortality in Patients With Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-­Associated Vasculitis but No Substantial Liver Disease. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:848121. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.848121.

27. Lazo M, Hernaez R, Bonekamp S, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and mortality among US adults: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2011;343:d6891. doi:10.1136/bmj.d6891.

28. Unalp-­Arida A, Ruhl CE. Liver fat scores predict liver disease mortality in the United States population. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;48(9):1003-16. doi:10.1111/apt.14967.

29. Zhang R, Ren S, Mi H, et al. Fatty liver index as an independent predictor of all-cause and disease-­specific mortality. Eur J Gas­troenterol Hepatol. 2024;36(12):1453-63. doi:10.1097/MEG.0000000000002865.

30. Нwang YC, Ahn HY, Park SW, et al. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Associates With Increased Overall Mortality and Death From Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, and Liver Disease in Women but Not Men. Clin Gastroenter Hepatol. 2018;16(7):1131-37.e5. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2017.11.026.

31. Alexander M, Loomis AK, van der Lei J, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of incident acute myocardial infarction and stroke: findings from matched cohort study of 18 million European adults. BMJ. 2019;367:l5367. doi:10.1136/bmj.l5367.


What is already known about the subject?

  • Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a mul­tidisciplinary problem and, according to studies, is associated with cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and high non-liver-­related mortality. Although some authors have shown associations of liver steatosis with car­dio­vascular disease and an increased mortality risk, the study results are contradictory.

What might this study add?

  • For the first time, using a prospective design and mul­tivariate analysis, the associations of a high fatty liver index (FLI ≥60) with the risk of death and non-fatal cardiovascular events were studied in a representative epidemiological sample of the Rus­sian population aged 25-64 years.
  • Cohort survival was shown to be inversely pro­por­tional to FLI level. After accounting for key risk factors (region, age, sex, lifestyle, and dysli­pi­demia), a high FLI was an independent predictor of the composite endpoint (fatal and nonfatal car­dio­vascular events) but was not independently asso­ciated with all-cause or cardiovascular mortality.
  • The results suggest that the FLI can be con­si­de­red a practical tool for risk stratification of car­dio­vascular events in working-age individuals, which is important for improving approaches to primary prevention.
  • The findings indicate the need for longer-term fol­low-up of younger cohorts to determine the long-term contribution of hepatic steatosis to mortality.

Review

For citations:


Evstifeeva S.E., Shalnova S.A., Kutsenko V.A., Kapustina А.V., Muromtseva G.A., Balanova Yu.A., Imaeva A.E., Karamnova N.S., Kotova M.B., Maksimov S.A., Litinskaya O.A., Pokrovskaya M.S., Filichkina E.M., Soplenkova A.G., Gomanova L.I., Shvabskaya O.B., Samokhina Yu.Yu., Viktorova I.A., Prishchepa N.N., Redko A.N., Yakushin S.S., Drapkina O.M. Fatty liver index as a predictor of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events in Russians: analysis of an epidemiological cohort. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2025;24(12):4589. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2025-4589. EDN: YHBWZB

Views: 625

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1728-8800 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0125 (Online)