Experience in creating a collection of microbial cultures and biological specimens at the reference center of the A. N. Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2026-4633
EDN: LTGQJN
Abstract
This article examines key aspects of the structural organization and functioning of a biobank, including the main stages of biological sample processing. Particular attention is paid to the implementation of research projects using preserved biological material and microbial strain collections. The article describes collection of microorganism strains and biological material in a cryobank, a division of the reference center for the verification of microbiological research results in coloproctology, established at the A. N. Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology. This article presents the experience of a reference center collaborating with medical facilities in Russian regions within the biological risk monitoring system. A cryobanking system for samples in priority areas of biomedical research is described. The obtained results demonstrate the importance of an integrated approach to biobanking for improving the effectiveness of scientific and clinical developments.
About the Authors
A. R. MelkumyanRussian Federation
Moscow
M. V. Spivak
Russian Federation
Moscow
A. A. Shafikova
Russian Federation
Moscow
S. I. Achkasov
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Ryan MJ, Schloter M, Berg G, et al. Development of microbiome biobanks — challenges and opportunities. Trends Microbiol. 2021; 29(2):89-92. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2021.01.009.
2. Kosobokova EN, Kalinina NA, Baryshnikova MA, et al. Bioresource collections: algorithms for development and functioning; basic and applied significance. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2023;22(11):3654. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2023-3654.
3. Jaroszewska E, Nasiłowska J, Sokolowska B. Microbial Culture Collections and Microbiological Biobanks in the Context of New ISO Standards. Adv Microbiol. 2023;62(1):55-60. doi: 10.2478/am-2023-0005.
4. Onishchenko GG, Kutyrev VV, Osin AV. Collection activities in the sphere of pathogenic microorganisms usage for the provision of biological safety in the Russian Federation. Infekcionnye bolezni: Novosti. Mnenija. Obuchenie. 2016;(1):37-46. (In Russ.)
5. Gracheva IV, Osin AV, Kutyrev VV. Principles of Formation of Collection Funds of Microorganism Strains. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2021;2:16-23. (In Russ.) doi:10.21055/0370-1069-2021-2-16-23.
6. Kinkorova J. Biobanks in the era of personalized medicine: objectives, challenges, and innovation: overview. EPMA J. 2016;7(1):4. doi:10.1186/s13167-016-0053-7.
7. Rush A, Catchpoole DR, Reaiche-Miller G, et al. What do biomedical researchers want from biobanks? Results of an online survey. Biopreserv Biobank. 2022;20(3):271-82. doi:10.1089/bio.2021.0084.
8. Vaught J. Biobanking comes of age: the transition to biospecimen science. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2016;56(1):211-28. doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010715-103246.
9. Lianos GD, Frountzas M, Kyrochristou ID, et al. What Is the Role of the Gut Microbiota in Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Resection? A Scoping Review of Clinical and Experimental Studies. J Clin Med. 2024;13(22):6634. doi:10.3390/jcm13226634.
10. Khan A, Kim S, Hong ST. Gut Microbes Libraries: A Key Resource for Current Gut Microbiome Research. J Bacteriol Virol. 2025; 55(1):1-9. doi:10.4167/jbv.2025.55.1.001.
11. Zika E, Paci D, Braun A, et al. A European survey on biobanks: trends and issues. Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(2):96-103. doi:10.1159/000296278.
12. Qiu Y, Fan D, Wang J, et al. High throughput construction of species characterized bacterial biobank for functional bacteria screening: demonstration with GABA-producing bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2025;16:1545877. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1545877.
13. Mouttham L, Garrison SJ, Archer DL, et al. A biobank's journey: Implementation of a quality management system and accreditation to ISO 20387. Biopreserv Biobank. 2021;19(3):163-70. doi:10.1089/bio.2020.0068.
14. Wittner R, Holub P, Mascia C, et al. Towards a Common Standard for Data and Specimen Provenance in Life Sciences. Learn Health Syst. 2023;18;8(1):e10365. doi:10.1002/lrh2.10365.
15. Clavel T, Faber F, Groussin M, et al. Enabling next-generation anaerobic cultivation through biotechnology to advance functional microbiome research. Nat Biotechnol. 2025;1-11. doi:10.1038/s41587-025-02660-6.
16. Dagher G. Quality matters: International standards for biobanking. Cell Prolif. 2022;55(8):e13282. doi:10.1111/cpr.13282.
17. Lewandowska I, Grzech K, Krzyszton-Russjan J. Importance of Human Faecal Biobanking: From Collection to Storage. Adv Microbiol. 2024;63(4):181-9. doi:10.2478/am-2024-0015.
What is already known about the subject?
- The role of a biobank in medical research center functioning is demonstrated.
- Methods for forming a collection of pathogenic, opportunistic, and probiotic microorganisms are described.
What might this study add?
- The results of creating a collection of microbial cultures isolated from biomaterials obtained from proctological patients with inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, anastomotic leakage, and other gastrointestinal diseases are presented.
Review
For citations:
Melkumyan A.R., Spivak M.V., Shafikova A.A., Achkasov S.I. Experience in creating a collection of microbial cultures and biological specimens at the reference center of the A. N. Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2026;25(1):4633. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2026-4633. EDN: LTGQJN
JATS XML













































