Comparing effectiveness of tissue and plasma plasminogen activator thrombolysis in patients with various severity of acute myocardial infarction
Abstract
Aim. To compare alteplase (AL) and streptokinase (SK) effectiveness in patients with various severity of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Material and methods. In retrospective analysis, 650 AMI patients were divided into three groups. Group I consisted of 183 subjects administered AL, Group II Р 232 individuals receiving SK, and Group III - 235 participants not administered any thrombolytic therapy (TLT). Each group was divided into three subgroups, according to Peel coronary prognostic index (CPI). Subgroup A included patients with Peel CPI of 1-8 points, Subgroup B Р 9-16 points, and subgroup C Р more than 16 points. Clinical outcomes of patients receiving AL, SK, or no TLT, were compared for all subgroups.
Results. In Subgroup C, lethality in AL therapy (28.6%) was significantly lower than in SK therapy (50.0%) or no TLT (45.3%) (p<0.05). In subgroup B, lethality was lower for both AL and SK treatment (2.6% and 2.3%, respectively), comparing to no TLT (10.6%) (p<0.05). In this subgroup, both thrombolytic agents significantly decreased heart failure (HF) incidence. In subgroup A, AL more effectively than SK or no TLT reduced risk of HF, post-AMI angina, not affecting lethality or recurrent MI rates.
Conclusion. AMI patients with low or high risk by Peel CPI should be administered AL. SK could be recommended for intermediate-risk AMI patients.
About the Authors
V. A. ShulmanRussian Federation
S. E. Golovenkin
Russian Federation
V. V. Rodionov
Russian Federation
G. V. Matyushin
Russian Federation
P. A. Shesternya
Russian Federation
References
1. Chesebro JH, Knatterud H, Roberts R, et al. Trombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial, Phase 1. A comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase. Clinical findings through hospital discharge. Circulation 1987; 76: 142-54.
2. The TIMI Research Group. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. N Engl J Med 1985; 312: 932-6.
3. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell’Infarto Miocardico: GISSI-2. Lancet 1990; 336: 65-71.
4. Third International Study of Infarct Survival Collaborative Group (ISIS-3). A randomized comparison of streptokinase versus tissue plasminogen activator versus anistriplase and of aspirin plus heparin aspirin alone among 41.299 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1992; 339: 759-70.
5. The GUSTO investigators. An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 673-82.
6. Van de Werf F, Topol EJ, Lee KL, et al. for the GUSTO Investigator. Variations in patient management for acute myocardial infarction in the United States and other countries. Results from the GUSTO Trial. JAMA 1995; 273,: 1586-91.
7. Peel A, Semple T, Wang J, et al. A coronary prognostic index for grading the severity of infarction. Brit Heart J 1962; 24: 745-60.
8. Ступелис И.Г. Прогнозирование в кардиологии. Вильнюс «Минтис» 1971; 163 с.
9. Алперт Дж., Френсис Г. Лечение инфаркта миокарда. Практическое руководство: Пер. с англ. Москва «Практика» 1994; 255 с.
10. Крыжановский В.А. Диагностика и лечение инфаркта миокарда. Киев «Феникс» 2001; 451 с.
11. Флетчер Р., Флетчер С., Вагнер Э. Клиническая эпидемиология. Основы доказательной медицины. Пер. с англ. Москва «Медиа Сфера» 1998; 352 с.
12. Laupacis A, Sackett DL, Roberts RS. An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 1728-33.
Review
For citations:
Shulman V.A., Golovenkin S.E., Rodionov V.V., Matyushin G.V., Shesternya P.A. Comparing effectiveness of tissue and plasma plasminogen activator thrombolysis in patients with various severity of acute myocardial infarction. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2005;4(6, ч.II):60-64. (In Russ.)