Preview

Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention

Advanced search

Perindopril metabolic effects and organo-protective action in metabolic syndrome patients

Abstract

Aim. To assess perindopril antihypertensive effects and its influence on metabolic disturbances, myocardial structure, and cerebral perfusion (CP) in patients with mild to moderate arterial hypertension (AH) and metabolic syndrome (MS) (AH + MS).
Material and methods. Thirty patients with mild to moderate AH + MS participated in the study. At baseline and 24 weeks later, 24-hour blood pressure monitoring (BPM), carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, insulin sensitivity, myocardial structure and function, as well as CP parameters were assessed.
Results. Target BP levels were achieved in 70% of the patients receiving perindopril: 9 and 21 patients were administered 4 and 8 mg/d, respectively. Fasting and postprandial glucose levels decreased significantly (both p<0,05). Insulin sensitivity index (Si) increased from 0,5 х 10-4 min-1(mcUml)-1 to 1,3 х 10-4 min-1(mcUml)-1 (р<0,05). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-CH) level increased significantly (p<0,05). Initially reduced CP substantially improved. In all participants, perindopril therapy resulted in regressed left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and improved LV geometry.
Conclusion. Perindopril demonstrates good antihypertensive effect, improved carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, as well as tissue insulin sensitivity, CP, LV structure and function in AH + MS patients.

About the Authors

V. B. Mychka
A.L. Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology, Russian Cardiology Scientific and Clinical Complex, State Federal Agency for Health and Social Development, Moscow
Russian Federation


V. P. Masenko
A.L. Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology, Russian Cardiology Scientific and Clinical Complex, State Federal Agency for Health and Social Development, Moscow
Russian Federation


N. V. Flegontova
A.L. Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology, Russian Cardiology Scientific and Clinical Complex, State Federal Agency for Health and Social Development, Moscow
Russian Federation


D. M. Ataullakhanova
A.L. Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology, Russian Cardiology Scientific and Clinical Complex, State Federal Agency for Health and Social Development, Moscow
Russian Federation


V. B. Sergienko
A.L. Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology, Russian Cardiology Scientific and Clinical Complex, State Federal Agency for Health and Social Development, Moscow
Russian Federation


I. E. Chazova
A.L. Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology, Russian Cardiology Scientific and Clinical Complex, State Federal Agency for Health and Social Development, Moscow
Russian Federation


References

1. Myers MG. A dose- response study of perindopril in hypertension: effect on blood pressure 6 and 24 hours after dosing. Can J Cardiol 1996; 12: 1191-6.

2. Stumpe K, Overlack A. Perindopril therapeutic safety study. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 32E-7.

3. Маколкин В.И., Подзолков В.И., Ренскова Т.В. Оценка влияния периндоприла на величину АД, ремоделирование сосудов и микроциркуляцию при гипертонической болезни. Кардиология 2001; 6: 13-7.

4. Чазова И.Е. Российская многоцентровая программа ПРИЗ – изучение антигипертензивной эффективности и переносимости периндоприла в широкой клинической практике. Cons med 2002; 3(4): 125-9.

5. Papageorgiou A, Karayannis A, Athyros V, et al. A comparatuve study of the efficacy and safety of quinapril and lisinopril in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Drug invest 1994; 7(1): 396-404.

6. Lender D, Arauz4Pacheco C, Breen L, et al. A Double Blind Comparison of the Effect of Amlodipin and Enalapril on Insulin Sensitivity in Hypertensive Patients. Am J Hypertens 1999; 12: 298-303.

7. Богачев Р.С., Базика И.Б., Долгинцева С.А. Влияние эналаприла на состояние миокарда левого желудочка и механизмы атерогенеза у больных артериальной гипертонией. Кардиология 2000; 12: 61-3.

8. Zannad F, Matzinger A, Laeche J. Throug/peak ratios of once daily angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium antagonists. Am J Hypertens 1996; 9: 633-64.

9. Estacio RO, Jeffers BW, Hiatt WR, et al. «The effect of nisoldipine as compared with enalapril on cardiovascular outcomes in patient with non4insulin4dependent diabetes and hypertension». N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 645-52.

10. UK prospective diabetes study group «Efficiacy of atenolol and captopril in reducing risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes». BMG 1998; 317: 713-20.

11. Hansson L, Lindholm LH, Niscahen, et al. Effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition compared with conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity in hypertension: the captopril prevention project. Lancet 1999; 353: 611-6.

12. UK prospective diabetes group «Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS438». BMG 1998; 317: 703-13.

13. Tatti P, Pahor M, Byington RP, et al. Outcome results of the fosinopril versus amlodipine cardiovascular events randomized trial (FACET)in patients with hypertension and NIDDM. Diabetes care 1998; 21: 597-603.


Review

For citations:


Mychka V.B., Masenko V.P., Flegontova N.V., Ataullakhanova D.M., Sergienko V.B., Chazova I.E. Perindopril metabolic effects and organo-protective action in metabolic syndrome patients. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2007;6(2):34-41. (In Russ.)

Views: 1037


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1728-8800 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0125 (Online)