Educational priorities and programs for the development of research competencies in science-based medical education

The active development of technology since the middle of the 20th century has changed the requirements for education in view of the demand for knowledge-intensive specialties. The current approach is focused on the intersubjectivity and complexity of problem solving, the project organization of training and the practical orientation of learning courses. The training of specialists capable of solving qualitatively new tasks is possible only in a special environment where personal and professional competencies are formed. The transformation of education in medicine has led to the active integration of research and clinical experience. A significant impetus for the transition to a new level is provided by the development of cognitive competencies, critical thinking, which is closely interrelated with evidence-based medicine. Novel training programs make it possible to receive research, management, entrepreneurial and communication competencies inaddition to classical clinical education. At present, the future belongs to interdisciplinary teams based on developed clusters.

1. Bowen J. A History of Western Education. Volume Three. The Modern West Europe and the New World. 1st ed. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd, 1981:664. ISBN: 9781315016245.

2. Wissema JG. Towards the third-generation university: managing the university in transition. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009:252. ISBN: 9781848442160.

3. Snow ChP. The Two Cultures. London: Cambridge University Press, 1959:198. ISBN: 0521457300.

4. Shchedrovitskiy GP, Rozin VM, Alekseev NG, et al. Pedagogy and logic. Moscow: Kastal, 1993. p. 415. (In Russ.)

5. Altbach PG. Global Perspectives on Higher Education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 2016:332. ISBN: 9781421419268.

6. Zagvozdkin VK. The problem of key competencies in foreign research. Educational Studies (NIU VShE). 2009;4:257-72. (In Russ.)

7. Bahl A. Von Schlussel qualifikationen zu globalen "key competencies": Stationen einer anhaltenden Debatteuber den Stellenwertfach uber greifen der Kompetenz en. In A. Bahl (Hrsg.) Kompetenzen fur die globale Wirtschaft: Begriffe - Erwartungen — Entwicklungsansatze. Bielefeld: W. Bertelsmann Verlag. 2009:19-39. doi:10.25656/01:2540.

8. Schrufer G, Wrenger K, Lindemann I. "Reflectories" for the Promotion of Competences in Education for Sustainable Development Using the Example of Climate Change. Voprosy obrazovaniya. Educational Studies Moscow. 2020;2:152-74. (In Russ.) doi:10.17323/1814-9545-2020-2-152-174.

9. Abrami Ph, Bernard RM, Borokhovski E. Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research. 2015;85,2:275-314. doi:10.3102/0034654314551063.

10. Sel'e G. From dreams to discovery. How to become a scientist. M.: Progress, 1987. p. 368. (In Russ.)

11. Wotson J. DNA. The History of the Genetic Revolution. Moscow: Piter, 2019. p. 512. (In Russ.)

12. Collins R. Analysis of intelligent networks and Russian thought in the European context. Domestic notes. 2002;3(4). (In Russ.)

13. Bateson G. Ecology of the Mind: Selected articles on anthropology, psychiatry and epistemology. Moscow: Smisl, 2000. p. 476. (In Russ.)

14. Kahneman D. Think slowly... decide quickly. Moscow: AST, 2014. p. 653. (In Russ.)

15. Richards JB, Hayes MM, Schwartzstein RM. Teaching Clinical Reasoning and Critical Thinking: From Cognitive Theory to Practical Application. Chest. 2020;158(4):1617-28. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.525.

16. Daniel M, Rencic J, Durning SJ, et al. Clinical Reasoning Assessment Methods: A Scoping Review and Practical Guidance. Acad Med. 2019;94(6):902-12. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002618.

17. Norman GR, Monteiro SD, Sherbino J, et al. The Causes of Errors in Clinical Reasoning: Cognitive Biases, Knowledge Deficits, and Dual Process Thinking. Acad Med. 2017;92(1):23-30. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001421.

18. Borodulin VI, Topoliansky AV. Moscow therapeutic schools (from the 1920s to the 1940s). Therapeutic Archive. 2013;85(8):101-4. (In Russ.)

19. Richards JB, Schwartzstein RM. Promoting Critical Thinking in Your Intensive Care Unit Team. Crit Care Clin. 2022;38(1):113-27. doi:10.1016/j.ccc.2021.08.002.

20. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71-2. doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71.

21. Jenicek M. Towards evidence-based critical thinking medicine? Uses of best evidence in flawless argumentations. Med Sci Monit. 2006;12(8):RA149-A153.

22. Varganova DL, Pavlov ChS, Svistunov AA. Cochrane methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of medicines, a domestic contribution to the work of international Cochrane Cooperation. Sechenov Medical Journal. 2019;10(4):31-7. (In Russ.) doi:10.47093/22187332.2019.4.31-39.