Preview

Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention

Advanced search

THE RESULTS OF DELAYED ENDOVASCULAR INTERVENTION IN ST ELEVATION ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION DUE TO THROMBOTIC OCCLUSION OF CORONARY ARTERY

https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2017-1-40-45

Abstract

Aim. To study clinical results and safety of delayed vs urgent stenting with application of modern  antithrombotic drugs  in massive coronary thrombosis  in patients  with ST-elevation acute  myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Material and methods. Totally, 28 STEMI patients  included, age  52 (25-77) y.o., of those males 80% (n=23), who, during January 2014 to February 2016, in first 6-12 hours from the onset of the disease, received endovascular  treatment  with purpose  to recover adequate blood flow without urgent  stent  implanting into  infarct-related  artery.  Minimal invasive strategy with the aim to recover antegrade blood flow up to TIMI 2-3 was done for 14 (50%) patients. In all patients, after restoring of the antegrade flow, there was thrombus, visualized in artery lumen, with TIMI thrombus grade score (TTG) ≥3. Another criteria of efficacy was resolving of ST elevation by ≥50%. As antiplatelet support during the intervention all patients  received the combination of IIb/IIIa blockers  (eptifibatide) and 600 mg clopidogrel or 180 mg ticagrelor. Second coronary arteriography (CAG) was done in up to 5 days.

Results. By 4,0±1,0 day, blood flow TIMI 2-3 in infarction-related artery was secure in 100% patients; there was marked decrease of the grade of target   stenosis   in  infarction-related   artery   from  77,8±10,2%   to 50,5±19,5%;  decrease by its length from 21,5±8,5  to 15,5±5,5  mm; increase  of the reference  diameter  of artery from 3,1±0,8 to 3,5±0,75 mm, and thrombosis bride by TTG — from 3,9 to 0,9. By the data from CAG, stenting of the target segment  was done in 8 (29%) patients, and in 3 (10%) stenting done based on the data from intravascular ultrasound. In 17 (61%) patients the infarction-related stenosis was non-significant. In the group of delayed stenting there was no cases  of no/slow-reflow development. At hospital stage  of management, there were no cardiovascular events in the observation group.

Conclusion. In patients  with massive thrombosis  of infarction-related artery  (TTG ≥3) and  restored  antegrade coronary  flow TIMI  2-3,  the delayed stenting is a safe and effective strategy of treatment at hospital stage.

About the Authors

A. V. Azarov
Mytischi City Clinical Hospital; N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation


S. P. Semitko
N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation


М. G. Glezer
I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health
Russian Federation


R. V. Akhramovich
Mytischi City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


A. I. Maloroev
Mytischi City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


I. S. Melnichenko
Mytischi City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


G. Yu. Atarov
Mytischi City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


A. V. Lebedev
Mytischi City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


References

1. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI Focused Update on primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: An Update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. JACC 2016; 67(10): 1235-50.

2. Kelbaek H, Terkelsen CJ, Helqvist, et al. Randomized comparison of distal protection versus conventional treatment in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC 2008; 51: 899-905.

3. Vlaar PJ, Svilaas T, van der Horst IC, et al. Cardiac death and reinfarction after 1 – year in the Trombus Aspiration during Percutaneous coronary intervention in Acute myocardial infarction Study (TAPAS): a 1-year follow-up study. Lancet 2008; 371: 1915-20.

4. Henning K, Engstrom T, Ahtarovski K, et al. Deferred stent implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pilot study. EuroIntervention 2013; 8(10): 1126-33.

5. Vecchio S, Varani E, Chechi T, et al. Coronary thrombus in patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI: Prognostic significance and management. World J Cardiol 2014; 6(6): 381-92.

6. Sianos G, Papafaklis MI, Daemen J, et al. Angiographic stent thrombosis after routine use of drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the importance of thrombus burden. JACC 2007; 50: 573-83.

7. Gibson CM, de Lemos JA, Murphy SA, et al. Combination therapy with abciximab reduces angiographically evident thrombus in acute myocardial infarction: a TIMI 14 substudy. Circulation 2001; 103: 2550-4.

8. Montalescot G, Borentain M, Payot L, et al. Early vs late administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in primary percutaneous coronary intervention of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2004; 292(3): 362-6.

9. Vranckx P, Campo G, Anselmi M, et al. Does the site of bleeding matter? A stratified analysis on location of TIMI-graded bleedings and their impact on 12-month outcome in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. EuroIntervention 2012; 8(1): 71-8.

10. Karrowni W, Vyas A, Giacomino B, et al. Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6(8): 814-23.

11. Joyal D, Bertrand OF, Rinfret S, et al. Meta-analysis of ten trials on the effectiveness of the radial versus the femoral approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2012; 109: 813-8.

12. Baklanov DV, Kaltenbach LA, Marso SP, et al. The prevalence and outcomes of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: analysis from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007 to 2011). JACC 2013; 61: 420-6.

13. Tang L, Zhou SH, Hu XQ, et al. Effect of delayed vs immediate stent implantation in myocardial perfusion and cardiac function in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI with thrombus aspiration. Can J Cardiol. 2011; 27(5): 541-7.

14. Carrick D, Oldroyd KG, McEntegart M, et al. A randomized trial of deferred stenting versus immediate stenting to prevent no or slow-reflow in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (DEFER-STEMI). JACC 2014; 63(20): 2088-98.

15. Freixa X, Belle L, Joseph L, et al. Immediate vs. delayed stenting in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EuroIntervention 2013; 8(10): 1207-16.

16. Kelbæk H, Høfsten DE, Køber L, et al. Deferred versus conventional stent implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (DANAMI 3-DEFER): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 387(10034): 2199-206.

17. Brodie BR, Stuckey TD, Hansen C, et al. Relation between ECG ST-segment resolution myocardial infarction: analysis from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007 to 2011). JACC 2013; 61: 420-6.

18. Jolly SS, Cairns JA, Yusuf S, et al. TOTAL Investigators. Outcomes after thrombus aspiration for ST elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year follow-up of the prospective randomised TOTAL trial. Lancet 2016; 387(10014): 127-35.


Review

For citations:


Azarov A.V., Semitko S.P., Glezer М.G., Akhramovich R.V., Maloroev A.I., Melnichenko I.S., Atarov G.Yu., Lebedev A.V. THE RESULTS OF DELAYED ENDOVASCULAR INTERVENTION IN ST ELEVATION ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION DUE TO THROMBOTIC OCCLUSION OF CORONARY ARTERY. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2017;16(1):40-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2017-1-40-45

Views: 1009


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1728-8800 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0125 (Online)