IMPLEMENTATION OF EVIDENCE-BASED CLINICAL-AND-MORPHOLOGICAL APPROPRIATE USE CRITERIA FOR CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME IN RUSSIA
https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2014-2-24-28
- Р Р‡.МессенРТвЂВВВВВВВВжер
- РћРТвЂВВВВВВВВнокласснРСвЂВВВВВВВВРєРСвЂВВВВВВВВ
- LiveJournal
- Telegram
- ВКонтакте
- РЎРєРѕРїРСвЂВВВВВВВВровать ссылку
Full Text:
Abstract
Aim. To study possibility of using the evidence-based clinical-andmorphological appropriate use criteria for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) for expert evaluation of high-technology procedures implementation in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in Russia.
Materials and methods. The appropriateness of performed PCI was assessed in patients with ACS, underwent coronary revascularization. The potential need in PCI was determined in ACS patients refused from coronary revascularization. Assessment was performed with the help of ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization Focused Update (ACCF 2012). Data from 65,912 ACS patients, containing in Russian ACS Registry (2010–2011) were examined.
Results. ACCF 2012 criteria allow to assess the clinical appropriateness of PCI in 79.2% of patients underwent coronary revascularization and to determine the potential need in PCI in 80.6% of patients, refrained from coronary revascularization. Among ACS patients underwent PCI (n=9147), intervention was appropriate in 68.9% of cases. Inappropriate PCI was revealed in 4.6% of cases. Among patients refrained from PCI (n=56765), coronary revascularization was potentially appropriate in 57.9% of cases.
Conclusion. ACCF 2012 clinical-and-morphological criteria allow to judge on appropriateness of performed PCI and to evaluate the potential need in PCI among the most part of Russian ACS patients. In present study coronary revascularization was appropriate in the majority of ACS patients. It was shown possible to use the evidence-based clinical-andmorphological criteria for expert evaluation of high-technology procedures implementation in Russian ACS patients.
About the Authors
Yu. V. PopovaRussian Federation
O. M. Posnenkova
Russian Federation
A. R. Kiselev
Russian Federation
V. I. Gridnev
Russian Federation
P. Ya. Dovgalevsky
Russian Federation
References
1. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JACC 2011; 58 (24): e44-122.
2. Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2010; 31 (20): 2501-55.
3. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomized trials. Lancet 2003; 361: 13-20.
4. Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, et al. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization. JACC 2009; 53 (6): 530-53.
5. Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, et al. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/ AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization Focused Update. JACC 2012; 59 (9): 857-81.
6. Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2007; 116: e148-304.
7. Chan PS, Patel MR, Klein LW, et al. Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JAMA 2011; 306 (1): 53-61.
8. Bradley SM, Maynard C, Bryson CL. Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Washington State. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2012; 5 (4): 445-53.
Review
For citations:
Popova Yu.V., Posnenkova O.M., Kiselev A.R., Gridnev V.I., Dovgalevsky P.Ya. IMPLEMENTATION OF EVIDENCE-BASED CLINICAL-AND-MORPHOLOGICAL APPROPRIATE USE CRITERIA FOR CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME IN RUSSIA. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2014;13(2):24-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2014-2-24-28
ISSN 2619-0125 (Online)