Preview

Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention

Advanced search

THE COMPARISON OF ARRHYTHMOGENICITY OF DIFFERENT SURGICAL APPROACHES TO ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART DISEASE

https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2014-2-40-45

Abstract

Aim. To estimate the prevalence of iatrogenic atrial flutter in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) after two types of surgical operations: radiofrequency pulmonary veins isolation and radiofrequency modified mini Maze procedure; and to compare the results with control group of patients undergone aortic-coronary bypass grafting (CABG).

Material and methods. Totally 95 patients included with CHD and persistent AF. Subjects were randomized into three groups: 1st (n=31) — with simultaneous CABG and radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary veins ostiums; 2nd (n=30) — simultaneous CABG and mini Maze procedure; 3rd control (n=34) — CABG only. For prolonged ECG monitoring the implanted devices Reveal XT were used in 53 subjects.

Results. The patients escaped from left-atrial flutter were 90% in the 1st group. In the 2nd there was 1 case of left-atrial flutter (according to electrophysiological investigation — the leap through the mitral valve line), meaning 96,9% patients free from it. However there was no significant difference between 1st and 2nd groups (p=0,6). In the 3rd group postprocedure flutter developed in one case too, due to the scar on the left atrium wall after mitral valve regurgitation correction; so 97% patients escaped from flutter, but the difference was still not significant (p=0,4).

Conclusion. In patients with CHD and AF it is recommended to perform radiofrequency modified mini Maze procedure combined with CABG due to its lower proarrhythmogenic effect. The rate of iatrogenic flutter is 3,1% after mini Maze and 10% after pulmonary veins ostiums isolation.

About the Authors

A. M. Chernyavsky
Federal State Institution Academician E. N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk State Research Institute Of Circulation Pathology of Russian Ministry of Public Health, Novosibirsk
Russian Federation


Yu. E. Kareva
Federal State Institution Academician E. N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk State Research Institute Of Circulation Pathology of Russian Ministry of Public Health, Novosibirsk
Russian Federation


I. A. Pak
Federal State Institution Academician E. N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk State Research Institute Of Circulation Pathology of Russian Ministry of Public Health, Novosibirsk
Russian Federation


S. S. Rakhmonov
Federal State Institution Academician E. N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk State Research Institute Of Circulation Pathology of Russian Ministry of Public Health, Novosibirsk
Russian Federation


A. B. Romanov
Federal State Institution Academician E. N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk State Research Institute Of Circulation Pathology of Russian Ministry of Public Health, Novosibirsk
Russian Federation


E. A. Pokushalov
Federal State Institution Academician E. N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk State Research Institute Of Circulation Pathology of Russian Ministry of Public Health, Novosibirsk
Russian Federation


References

1. Zheleznev SI, Bogavachev-Prokophiev AV, Nazarov VM, et al. Long-term results of surgical procedures Maze in patients with valve disease and atrial fibrillation. Circulatiion pathology and cardiac surgery 2011; 3: 17–21. Russian (Железнев С. И., Богачев-Прокофьев А.В., Назаров В. М. и др. Отдаленные результаты хирургической процедуры Maze у пациентов с клапанной патологией и фибрилляцией предсердий. Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия 2011; 3: 17–21).

2. Zheleznev SI, Bogavachev-Prokophiev AV, Pivkin AN, et al. Comparative analysis of results of mono-and bipolar radiofrequency ablation in patients with valvular heart disease and atrial fibrillation. Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery 2012; 4: 84–7. Russian (Железнев С. И., Богачев-Прокофьев А.В., Пивкин А. Н. и др. Сравнительный анализ результатов моно- и биполярной радиочастотной аблации у пациентов с клапанными пороками сердца и фибрилляцией предсердий. Кардиология и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия 2012; 4: 84–7).

3. Cherniavsky AM, Pokushalov EA, Pak IA, et al. Results of surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with coronary heart disease. Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2009; 2: 44–9. Russian (Чернявский А. М., Покушалов Е. А., Пак И. А. и др. Результаты хирургического лечения фибрилляции предсердий у больных ишемической болезнью сердца. Грудная и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия 2009; 2: 44–9).

4. Cherniavsky AM, Pokushalov EA, Pak IA, et al. Experience radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with coronary heart disease during CABG surgery. Annals arrhythmology. 2011; 2: 32–7. Russian (Чернявский А.М, Покушалов Е. А., Пак И. А. и др. Опыт радиочастотной аблации фибрилляции предсердий у больных ишемической болезнью сердца во время операции АКШ. Анналы аритмологии 2011; 2: 32–7).

5. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Сonsensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Patient Selection, Procedural Techniques, Patient Management and Follow-up, Definitions, Endpoints, and Research Trial Design. Europace (2012) doi: 10.1093/europace/eus027 First published online: March 1, 2012.

6. Ad N, Cheng D, Martin J, et al. Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery: a Consensus Statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2009. Innovations (Phila) 2010; 5: 74–83.

7. Cui Yong Qiang, Sun Ling Bo, Li Yan, et al. Intraoperative Modified Cox Mini-Maze Procedure for Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85: 1283–9.

8. Chiappini B, Martin-Suarez S, LoForte A, et al. Cox/Maze III operation versus radiofrequency ablation for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation: a comparative study. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 87–92.

9. Gillinov AM, McCarthy PM, Blackstone EH, et al. Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation with bipolar radiofrequency as the primary modality. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129: 1321–8.

10. Golovchiner G, Mazur A, Kogan A, et al. Atrial flutter after surgical radiofrequency ablation of the left atrium for atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 108.

11. Jons C, Jacobson UG, Olsen NT et al. The incidence and prognostic significance of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction and left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a CRISMA substudy. Heart Rhythm 2011; 8: 342–8.

12. Kobza R, Hindricks G, Tanner H, et al. Late recurrent arrhythmias after ablation of atrial fibrillation: incidence, mechanisms, and treatment. Heart Rhythm. 2004;1 (6):676–83.

13. Kondo N, Takahashi K, Minakawa M, et al. Left atrial Maze procedure: A useful addition to other corrective operations. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75: 1490–9.

14. Sie HT, Beukema WP, Elvan A, et al. Long-term results of irrigated radiofrequency modified maze procedure in 200 patients with concomitant cardiac surgery six years experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 512–7.


Review

For citations:


Chernyavsky A.M., Kareva Yu.E., Pak I.A., Rakhmonov S.S., Romanov A.B., Pokushalov E.A. THE COMPARISON OF ARRHYTHMOGENICITY OF DIFFERENT SURGICAL APPROACHES TO ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART DISEASE. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2014;13(2):40-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2014-2-40-45

Views: 577


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1728-8800 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0125 (Online)